e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-28275
PFSWEB, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
75-2837058
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
500 North Central Expressway, Plano, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
75074
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
972-881-2900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer
and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of
June 30, 2009 (based on the closing price as reported by the National Association of Securities
Dealers Automated Quotation System) was $13,102,106.
At March 31, 2010, there were 9,954,957 shares of the registrants Common Stock issued, $.001
par value.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III of this Annual Report, to the extent not set forth
herein, is incorporated herein by reference from the registrants definitive proxy statement
relating to the annual meeting of shareholders, which definitive proxy statement shall be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to
which this Annual Report relates.
INDEX
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to PFSweb, the Company, we, us and our
refer to PFSweb, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its
subsidiaries.
PART I
General
PFSweb is an international business process outsourcing provider of end-to-end eCommerce
solutions. PFSweb provides these solutions to major brand name companies seeking to optimize their
supply chain and to enhance their traditional and online business channels and initiatives.
Through our eCOST.com® business unit, we are also a leading multi-category online discount retailer
of new, close-out and recertified brand-name merchandise. We derive our revenues from three
business segments: 1) eCommerce and business process outsourcing, 2) master distribution and 3)
online discount retailing.
First, in our eCommerce and business process outsourcing business segment operated by our
Priority Fulfillment Services subsidiaries (PFS), we derive our revenues from a broad range of
services as we process individual business transactions on our clients behalf. These business
transactions may include the answering of a phone call or an e-mail, the design and hosting of a
client web-site, supporting an email marketing campaign, the deployment of an eCommerce technology
platform, the receipt and storage of a clients inventory, the kitting and assembly of products to
meet a clients specifications, the shipping of products to our clients customer base, the
management of a complex set of electronic data transactions designed to keep our clients suppliers
and customers accounting records in balance, and/or the processing of a returned package. In the
eCommerce and business process outsourcing segment, we do not own the inventory or the resulting
accounts receivable, but provide management services for these client-owned assets.
In our second business segment operated by our Supplies Distributors subsidiaries we act as a
master distributor of product for InfoPrint Solutions Company (IPS), a joint venture company
owned by Ricoh and International Business Machines (IBM), and certain other clients. In this
capacity, we purchase and resell for our own account, IPS and other manufacturers inventory.
Accordingly, in this business segment, we recognize product revenue and own the accounts receivable
and inventory.
Our third business segment is eCOST.com® (eCOST), an online discount retailer of new,
close-out and recertified brand-name merchandise. This web-commerce product revenue model is
focused on the sale of products to a broad range of consumer and business customers. We currently
offer approximately 300,000 products in several primary merchandise categories, including
computers, networking, electronics and entertainment, TVs, monitors and projectors, cameras and
camcorders, memory and storage, For the Home and sports and leisure.
We are headquartered in Plano, Texas where our executive and administrative offices and our
primary technology operations and hosting facilities are located. We have an office in El Segundo,
California, which consists of sales, marketing and purchasing operations for our online discount
retailer segment. We operate state-of-the-art call centers from our U.S. facilities located in
Plano, Texas, and Memphis, Tennessee, and from our international facilities located in Toronto,
Canada, Liege, Belgium and Manila, Philippines. We lease or manage warehouse facilities of
approximately 1.8 million square feet, many containing highly automated and state of the art
material handling and communications equipment, in Memphis, Tennessee, Southaven, Mississippi,
Grapevine, Texas, Toronto, Canada and Liege, Belgium, allowing us to provide global distribution
solutions.
ECOMMERCE AND BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING SEGMENT
PFS is a global provider of end-to-end eCommerce and business process outsourcing solutions.
Marketed as PFSwebs End2End eCommerce® platform, PFS services breadth includes
offerings such as eCommerce technology and integration services, interactive marketing services,
global logistics and order fulfillment, freight and transportation management, real-time order
management, kitting and assembly, customer care, facility operations and management, turn-key
web-commerce infrastructure, payment processing and financial services. Collectively, we define our
offering as End-to-End eCommerce and Business Process Outsourcing because we extend our clients
infrastructure and technology capabilities, addressing an entire business transaction cycle from
demand generation to product delivery. Our solutions support both business-to-business (B2B) and
business-to-consumer (B2C) sales channels.
1
PFS serves as the brand behind the brand for companies seeking to increase efficiencies,
enter new markets or launch optimized sales channels. As an eCommerce and business process
outsourcer, we offer scalable and cost-effective solutions for manufacturers, distributors, online
retailers and direct marketing organizations across a wide range of industry segments. We provide
our clients with seamless and transparent solutions to support their business strategies, allowing
them to focus on their core competencies. Leveraging PFS technology, expertise and proven
methodologies, we enable client organizations to develop and deploy new products and implement new
business strategies or address new distribution channels rapidly and efficiently through our
optimized solutions. Our clients engage us both as a consulting partner to assist them in the
design of a business solution as well as a virtual and physical infrastructure partner providing
the mission critical operations required to build and manage their business solution. Together, we
not only help our clients define new ways of doing business, but also provide them the technology,
physical infrastructure and professional resources necessary to quickly implement this business
model. We allow our clients to quickly and dramatically change how they go-to-market.
Each client has a unique business model and unique strategic objectives that often requires
highly customized solutions. PFS supports clients in a wide array of industries including fashion
apparel and accessories, consumer goods, luxury goods, fragrance and beauty products, technology
products, aviation, toys/education, collectibles, food and beverage and home furnishings. These
clients turn to PFS for help in addressing a variety of business issues that include eCommerce,
customer satisfaction and retention, time-definite logistics, vendor managed inventory and
integration, supply chain compression, cost model realignments, transportation management and
international expansion, among others. We also act as a constructive agent of change, providing
clients the ability to alter their current distribution model, establish direct relationships with
end-customers, and reduce the overall time and costs associated with existing distribution channel
strategies. Our clients are seeking solutions that will provide them with dynamic supply chain and
multi-channel marketing efficiencies, while ultimately delivering a world-class customer service
experience.
Our technology and business infrastructure offering is flexible, reliable and fully scalable.
This flexibility allows us to design custom, variable cost solutions to fit the business
requirements of our clients strategies.
Our capabilities are expansive. To offer the most necessary and resourceful solutions to our
clients, we are continually developing capabilities to meet the pressing business issues in the
marketplace. Our business objective is to focus on Leading the Evolution of
OutsourcingTM. As our tagline suggests, we will continue to evolve our service offering
to meet the needs of the marketplace and the demands of unique client requirements. We are most
successful when we provide a new capability to enable a client to pursue a new initiative and we
are then able to leverage that revolutionary development across other client or prospect solutions,
as it becomes best practice in the marketplace. Our team of experts design and build diverse
solutions for online retailers, technology and consumer goods manufacturers, aviation brands as
well as other major brand name clients around a flexible core of technology and physical
infrastructure that includes:
|
|
|
Technology collaboration provided by our suite of technology services that enable
buyers and suppliers to fully automate their business transactions within their supply
chain. We support industry standard collaboration techniques and protocols including XML
real-time application interfaces, secured text file exchanges and traditional electronic
data interchange (EDI); |
|
|
|
|
eCommerce technology solutions with managed hosting and Internet application
development services, including web site design, creation, integration and ongoing
maintenance, support and enhancement of web sites; |
|
|
|
|
Interactive Marketing Services with professionals and technologies that can be
integrated into a total solution to support user experience design, customer acquisition,
analytics, customer retention and revenue generation objectives; |
|
|
|
|
Order management, including order processing from any source of entry, back order
processing and future order processing, tracking and tracing, credit management, electronic
payment processing, calculation and collection of sales tax and VAT, comprehensive freight
calculation and email notification, all with multiple currency and language options;
|
2
|
|
|
Customer Relationship Management (CRM), including interactive voice response (IVR)
technology and web-enabled customer contact services through call centers
utilizing voice, e-mail, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) and internet chat
communications that are fully integrated with real-time systems and historical data
archives to provide complete customer lifecycle management; |
|
|
|
|
International fulfillment and distribution services, including warehouse management,
inventory management, vendor managed inventory, inventory postponement, product
warehousing, order picking and packing, freight and transportation management and reverse
logistics; |
|
|
|
|
Facility Operations and Management (FOM) that includes process reengineering, facility
design and engineering and employee administration; |
|
|
|
|
Kitting and assembly services, including light assembly, procurement services, supplier
relationship management, specialized kitting, and supplier consigned inventory hub in our
distribution facilities or co-located in other facilities; |
|
|
|
|
Product management and inspection services, including management of coupon programs,
de-kitting and salvage operations and inspection, testing and repackaging services; |
|
|
|
|
Information management, including real-time data interfaces, data exchange services and
data mining; |
|
|
|
|
Financial services, including secure online credit card processing related services,
fraud protection, invoicing, credit management and collection, and working capital
solutions; and |
|
|
|
|
Professional consulting services, including a consultative team of experts that
customize solutions to each client and continuously seek out ways to increase efficiencies
and produce benefits for the client. |
Industry Overview
Business activities in the public and private sectors continue to operate in an environment of
rapid technological advancement, increasing competition and continuous pressure to improve
operating and supply chain efficiency while decreasing costs. We currently see the following trends
within the industry:
|
|
|
Manufacturers strive to restructure their supply chains to maximize efficiency and
reduce costs in both B2B and B2C markets and to create a variable-cost supply chain able to
support the multiple, unique needs of each of their initiatives, including traditional and
electronic commerce. |
|
|
|
|
Companies in a variety of industries seek outsourcing as a method to address one or
more business functions that are not within their core business competencies, to reduce
operating costs or to improve the speed or cost of implementation. |
Supply Chain Management Trend
As companies maintain focus on improving their businesses and balance sheet financial ratios,
significant efforts and investments continue to be made identifying ways to maximize supply chain
efficiency and extend supply chain processes. Working capital financing, vendor managed inventory,
supply chain visibility software solutions, distribution channel skipping, direct to consumer
e-commerce sales initiatives, and complex upstream supply chain collaborative technology are
products that manufacturers seek to help them achieve greater supply chain efficiency.
A key business challenge facing many manufacturers and retailers as they evaluate their supply
chain efficiency is in determining how the trend toward increased direct-to-customer business
activity will impact their traditional B2B and B2C commerce business models. Order management and
small package fulfillment and distribution capabilities are becoming increasingly important
processes as this trend evolves. We believe manufacturers will look to outsource their non-core
competency functions to support this modified business model. We believe that companies will
continue to strategically plan for the impact that eCommerce and other new technology advancements
will have on their traditional commerce business models and their existing technology and
infrastructure capabilities.
3
Manufacturers, as buyers of materials, are also imposing new business practices and policies
on their supplier partners to shift the normal supply chain costs and risks associated with
inventory ownership away from their own balance sheets. Through techniques like Vendor Managed
Inventory or Consigned Inventory Programs (CIP), manufacturers are asking their suppliers, as a
part of the supplier selection process, to provide capabilities where the manufacturer need not
own, or even possess, inventory prior to the exact moment that unit of inventory is required as a
raw material component or for shipping to a customer. To be successful for all parties, business
models such as these often require a sophisticated collection of technological capabilities that
allow for complete integration and collaboration of the information technology environments of both
the buyer and supplier. For example, for an inventory unit to arrive at the precise required moment
in the manufacturing facility, it is necessary for the Manufacturing Resource Planning systems of
the manufacturer to integrate with the CRM systems of the supplier. When hundreds of supplier
partners are involved, this process can become quite complex and technologically challenging.
Buyers and suppliers are seeking solutions that utilize XML based protocols and traditional EDI
standards to ensure an open systems platform that promote easier technology integration in these
collaborative solutions.
Outsourcing Trend
In response to growing competitive pressures and technological innovations, we believe many
companies, both large and small, are focusing their critical resources on the core competencies of
their business and utilizing eCommerce and business process outsourcing to accelerate their
business plans in a cost-effective manner and perform non-core business functions. Outsourcing can
provide many key benefits, including the ability to:
|
|
|
Enter new business markets or geographic areas rapidly; |
|
|
|
|
Increase flexibility to meet changing business conditions and demand for products and
services; |
|
|
|
|
Enhance customer satisfaction and gain competitive advantage; |
|
|
|
|
Reduce capital and personnel investments and convert fixed investments to variable
costs; |
|
|
|
|
Improve operating performance and efficiency; and |
|
|
|
|
Capitalize on skills, expertise and technology infrastructure that would otherwise be
unavailable or expensive given the scale of the business. |
Typically, many outsourcing service providers are focused on a single function, such as
information technology, call center management, credit card processing, warehousing or package
delivery. This focus creates several challenges for companies looking to outsource more than one of
these functions, including the need to manage multiple outsourcing service providers, to share
information with service providers and to integrate that information into their internal systems.
Additionally, the delivery of these multiple services must be transparent to the customer and
enable the client to maintain brand recognition and customer loyalty. Furthermore, traditional
commerce outsourcers are frequently providers of domestic-only services versus international
solutions. As a result, companies requiring global solutions must establish additional
relationships with other outsourcing parties.
Another vital point for major brand name companies seeking to outsource is the protection of
their brand. When looking for an outsourcing partner to provide infrastructure solutions, brand
name companies must find a company that can ensure the same quality performance and superior
experience that their customers expect from their brands. Working with an outsourcing partner
requires finding a partner that can maintain the consistency of their brand image, which is one of
the most valuable intangible assets that recognized brand name companies possess.
The PFS Solution
PFS serves as the brand behind the brand for companies seeking high performance sales
channels.
Our value proposition is to become a seamless, well integrated extension of our clients
enterprises by delivering superior solutions that drive optimal customer experiences. On behalf of
the brands we serve, we wish to increase and enhance sales and market growth, bolster customer
satisfaction and customer retention, and drive costs out of the business through operations and
technology related efficiencies. We act as both a virtual and a physical infrastructure for our
clients businesses, embracing their brand values and strategic objectives. By utilizing our
services, our clients are able to:
4
Quickly Capitalize on Market Opportunities. Our solutions empower clients to rapidly
implement their supply chain and eCommerce strategies and to take advantage of opportunities
without lengthy integration and implementation efforts. We have readily available advanced
technology and physical infrastructure that is flexible in its design, which facilitates quick
integration and implementation. The PFS solution is designed to allow our clients to deliver
consistent quality service as transaction volumes grow and also to handle daily and seasonal peak
periods. Through our international locations, our clients can sell their products throughout the
world.
Improve the Customer Experience. We enable our clients to provide their customers with a
high-touch, positive buying experience thereby maintaining and promoting brand loyalty. Through our
use of advanced technology, we can respond directly to customer inquiries by e-mail, voice or data
communication and assist them with online ordering and product information. We believe we offer our clients a
world-class level of service, including 24-hour, seven-days-a-week, Web-enabled customer care
service centers, detailed CRM reporting and exceptional order accuracy. We have significant
experience in the development of eCommerce storefronts that allows us to recommend features and
functions that are easily navigated and understood by our clients customers. Our technology
platform is designed to ensure high levels of reliability and fast response times for our clients
customers. Because of our technology, our clients benefit from being able to offer
the latest in customer communication and response conveniences to their customers.
Minimize Investment and Improve Operating Efficiencies. One of the most significant benefits
that outsourcing can provide is the ability to transform fixed costs into variable costs. By
eliminating the need to invest in a fixed capital infrastructure, our clients costs typically
become directly correlated with volume increases or declines. Further, as volume increases drive
the demand for greater infrastructure or capacity, we are able to quickly deploy additional
resources. We provide services to multiple clients, which enables us to offer our clients economies
of scale, and resulting cost efficiency, that they may not have been able to obtain on their own.
Additionally, because of the large number of daily transactions we process, we have been able to
justify investments in levels of automation, security surveillance, quality control processes and
transportation carrier interfaces that are typically outside the scale of investment that our
clients might be able to cost justify on their own. These additional capabilities can provide our
clients the benefits of enhanced operating performance and efficiency, reduced inventory shrinkage,
and expanded customer service options.
Access a Sophisticated Technology Infrastructure. We provide our clients with ready access to
a sophisticated technology infrastructure that is designed to interface seamlessly with their
systems. We provide our clients with vital product and customer information that can be immediately
available to them on their own systems or through web based graphic user interfaces for use in data
mining, analyzing sales and marketing trends, monitoring inventory levels and performing other
management functions.
PFS Services
We offer a comprehensive and integrated set of business infrastructure solutions that are
tailored to our clients specific needs and enable them to quickly and efficiently implement their
supply chain strategies.
Technology Collaboration. We have created the Entente Suite(SM), which illustrates the level
of electronic cooperation that is possible when we construct solutions with our clients using this
technology service offering. This set of technology services encompasses a wide range of business
functions from order processing and inventory reporting to total e-commerce design and
implementation. The Entente Suite(SM) comprises five key services EntenteWeb®, EntenteDirect®,
EntenteMessage®, EntenteReport® and EntentePartnerConnect.
End-to-End eCommerce. We have integrated our services for contact center
management, warehousing, logistics and fulfillment with Demandware eCommerce, a leading on-demand
eCommerce platform, to provide a single, flexible solution spanning the eCommerce
storefront, delivery of goods and ongoing customer care. Designed specifically for B2C brands,
this offering redefines end-to-end eCommerce by enabling retailers and branded consumer goods
manufacturers with the ability to employ a total outsourcing solution customized to their
particular eCommerce strategy, without the loss of site or brand control associated with earlier
end-to-end outsourcing solutions.
5
GlobalMerchant Commerceware® B2B Managed Hosting and Internet Application Development. Our
GlobalMerchant Commerceware® service provides a complete e-commerce website solution for our B2B
clients. We engage collaboratively with our clients to design, build, host, and manage fully
branded, fully customized and fully integrated e-commerce web applications for B2B channels. We
offer a broad range of hosting and support plans that can be tailored to fit the needs of each
client. Utilizing IBMs eServer xSeries servers, Microsofts.NET Technologies and our proprietary
GlobalMerchant Commerceware platform, we maintain a robust hosting environment for our hosted
client B2B web sites.
Order Management. Our order management solutions provide clients with interfaces that allow
for real-time information retrieval, including information on inventory, sales orders, shipments,
delivery, purchase orders, warehouse receipts, customer history, accounts receivable and credit
lines. These solutions are seamlessly integrated with our web-enabled customer contact centers,
allowing for the processing of orders through shopping cart, phone, fax, mail, email, web chat, and
other order receipt methods. As the information backbone for our total supply chain solution, order
management services can be used on a stand-alone basis or in conjunction with our other business
infrastructure offerings, including customer contact, financial or distribution services. In
addition, for the B2B market, our technology platform provides a variety of order receipt methods
that facilitate commerce within various stages of the supply chain. Our systems provide the ability
for both our clients and their customers to track the status of orders at any time. Our services
are transparent to our clients customers and are seamlessly integrated with our clients internal
systems platforms and web sites. By synchronizing these activities, we can capture and provide
critical customer information, including:
|
|
|
Statistical measurements critical to creating a quality customer experience, containing
real-time order status, order exceptions, back order tracking, allocation of product based
on timing of online purchase and business rules, the ratio of customer inquiries to
purchases, average order sizes and order response time; |
|
|
|
|
B2B supply chain management information critical to evaluating inventory positioning,
for the purpose of reducing inventory turns, and assessing product flow through and
end-consumer demand; |
|
|
|
|
Reverse logistics information including customer response and reason for the return or
rotation of product and desired customer action; |
|
|
|
|
Detailed marketing information about what was sold and to whom it was sold, by location
and preference; and |
|
|
|
|
Web traffic reporting showing the number of visits (hits) received, areas visited,
and products and information requested. |
Customer Relationship Management. We offer a completely customized CRM solution for clients.
Our CRM solution encompasses a full-scale customer contact management service offering, as well as
a fully integrated customer analysis program. All customer contacts are captured and customer
purchases are documented. Full-scale reporting on all customer transactions is available for
evaluation purposes. Through each of our customer touch-points, information can be analyzed and
processed for current or future use in business evaluation, product effectiveness and positioning,
and supply chain planning.
An important feature of evolving commerce is the ability for the customer to speak with a live
customer service representative. Our experience has been that a majority of consumers tell us they
visited the web location for information, but not all of those consumers chose to place their order
online. Our customer care services utilize features that integrate voice, e-mail, standard mail,
data and Internet chat communications to respond to and handle customer inquiries. Our customer
care representatives answer various questions, acting as virtual representatives of our clients
organization, regarding order status, shipping, billing, returns and product information and
availability as well as a variety of other questions. For certain clients, we handle Level I and
Level II technical support. Level I technical support involves assisting clients customers with
basic technical issues, i.e. computer application issues. Level II support may involve a more
in-depth question and answer session with the customer. Our web-enabled customer care technology
identifies each customer contact automatically and routes it to the available customer care
representative who is individually trained in the clients business and products.
6
Our web-enabled customer care centers are designed so that our customer care representatives
can handle several different clients and products in a shared environment, thereby creating economy
of scale benefits for our clients as well as highly customized dedicated support models that
provide the ultimate customer experience and brand reinforcement. Our advanced technology also
enables our representatives to up-sell, cross-sell and inform customers of other products and sales
opportunities. The web-enabled customer care center is fully integrated into the data management
and order processing system, allowing full visibility into customer history and customer trends.
Through this fully integrated system, we are able to provide a complete CRM solution.
With the need for efficiency and cost optimization for many of our clients, we have integrated
IVR as another option for customer contacts. IVR creates an electronic workforce with virtual
agents that can assist customers with vital information at any time of the day or night. IVR allows
for our clients customers to deal interactively with our system to handle basic customer
inquiries, such as account balance, order status, shipment status, catalog requests, product and
price inquiries, and routine order entry for established customers. The inclusion of IVR in our
service offering allows us to offer a cost effective way to handle high volume, low complexity
calls.
International Fulfillment and Distribution Services. An integral part of our solution is the
warehousing and distribution of inventory either owned by our clients or owned by us. We currently
have approximately 1.8 million square feet of leased or managed warehouse space domestically and
internationally to store and process our and our clients inventory. We receive client inventory in
our distribution centers, verify shipment accuracy, unpack and audit packages (a process that
includes spot-checking a small percentage of the clients inventory to validate piece counts and
check for damages that may have occurred during shipping, loading and unloading). Upon request, we
inspect for other damages or defects, which may include checking fabric, stitching and zippers for
soft goods, or testing power-up capabilities for electronic items as well as product
specifications. We generally stock for sale within one business day of unloading. On behalf of our
clients, we pick, pack and ship their customer orders and can provide customized packaging,
capabilities of high volume shrink packaging, inserts and promotional literature for distribution
with customer orders. For many clients, we provide gift-wrapping services including customized
gift-wrapping paper, ribbon, gift-box and gift-messaging.
Our distribution facilities contain computerized sortation equipment, highly mobile
pick-to-light carts, powered material handling equipment, scanning and bar-coding systems and
automated conveyors and in-line scales. Our distribution complexes include several advanced
technology enhancements, such as radio frequency technology in product receiving processing to
ensure accuracy, as well as an automated package routing and a pick-to-light paperless order
fulfillment system. Our advanced distribution systems provide us with the capability to warehouse
an extensive number of stock keeping units (SKUs) for our clients, ranging from large high-end
laser printers to small cosmetic compacts. Our facilities are flexibly configured to process B2B
and single pick B2C orders from the same central location.
In addition to our advanced distribution systems, our pick-to-light carts, stationary
pick-to-light areas and conveyor system controls provide real time productivity reporting, thereby
providing our management team with the tools to implement productivity standards. This combination
of computer-controlled equipment provides the seamless integration of our pick-to-light systems and
mass sortation capabilities. This unique combination of technologies ensures high order accuracy
for each and every customer order.
Our primary B2B facility is in Southaven, Mississippi, containing almost 400,000 square feet
of space. The Southaven facility has clear height added cubic space utilization, state-of-the-art
lighting that increases the quality and volume of light while reducing energy costs, and certain
long-term tax incentives offered by the State of Mississippi. Southaven maintains the same
proximity to all modes of transportation compared with our Memphis facilities.
During 2009, we warehoused, managed and fulfilled more than $2.0 billion in merchandise and
transactions. Much of this does not represent our revenue, but rather the revenue of our clients
for whom we provided eCommerce and business process outsourcing solutions. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Based upon our clients needs, we are able to take advantage of a variety of shipping and
delivery options, which range from next day service to zone skipping to optimize transportation
costs. Our facilities and systems are
7
equipped with multi-carrier functionality, allowing us to integrate with all leading package
carriers and provide a comprehensive freight and transportation management offering. In addition,
an increasingly important function that we provide for our clients is reverse logistics management.
We offer a wide array of product return services, including issuing return authorizations, receipt
of product, crediting customer accounts, and disposition of returned product.
Our domestic clients enjoy the benefits of having their inventory assets secured by trained
law enforcement professionals from our security headquarters in Memphis, Tennessee and Southaven,
Mississippi. Continual validation ensures that we employ the latest in security processes and
procedures to further enhance our surveillance and detection capabilities. Our security program
continues to gain trust and confidence from our clients as we protect their products and assets.
Facility Operations and Management. Our FOM service offering includes distribution facility
design and optimization, business process reengineering and ongoing staffing and management. Along
with our operations in Mississippi and Tennessee, we also manage an aircraft parts distribution
center in Grapevine, TX on behalf of one of our clients. Our expertise in supply chain management,
logistics and customer-centric fulfillment operations extends through our management of
client-owned facilities, resulting in cost reductions, process improvements and technology-driven
efficiencies.
Kitting and Assembly Services. Our expanded kitting and assembly services enable our clients
to reduce the time and costs associated with managing multiple suppliers, warehousing hubs, and
light manufacturing partners. As a single source provider, we provide clients with the advantage of
convenience, accountability and speed. Our comprehensive kitting and assembly services provide a
quality one-stop resource for any international channel. Our kitting and assembly services include
light assembly, specialized kitting and supplier-consigned inventory hub either in our distribution
facilities or co-located elsewhere. We also offer customized light manufacturing and Supplier
Relationship Management.
We will work with clients to re-sequence certain supply chain activities to aid in an
inventory postponement strategy. We can provide kitting and assembly services and build-to-stock
thousands of units daily to stock in a Just-in-Time (JIT) environment. This service, for example,
can entail the procurement of packaging materials including retail boxes, foam inserts and
anti-static bags. These raw material components would be shipped to us from domestic or overseas
manufacturers, and we will build the finished SKUs to stock for the client. Also included is the
custom configuration of high-end printers and servers. This strategy allows manufacturers to make
a smaller investment in base unit inventory while meeting changing customer demand for highly
customizable product.
Combining our assembly services with our supplier-owned inventory hub services allows our
clients to reduce cycle times, to compress their supply chains and to consolidate their operations
and supplier management functions. We have supplier inventory management, assembly and fulfillment
services all in one place, providing greater flexibility in product line utilization, as well as
rapid response to change orders or packaging development. Our standard capabilities include:
build-to-order, build-to-stock, expedited orders, passive and active electrostatic discharge
(ESD) controls, product labeling, serial number generation, marking and/or capture, lot number
generation, asset tagging, bill of materials (BOM) or computer automated design (CAD)
engineering change processing, SKU-level pricing and billing, manufacturing and metrics reporting,
first article approval processes, and comprehensive quality controls.
Our kitting and assembly services also include procurement. We work directly with client
suppliers to make JIT inventory orders for each component in client packages, thereby ensuring we
receive the appropriate inventory quantities at just the right time and we then turn them around
JIT to customers.
Kitting and inventory hub services enable clients to collapse supply chains into the minimal
steps necessary to prepare product for distribution to any channel, including wholesale, mass
merchant retail, or direct to consumer. Clients no longer have to employ multiple providers or
require suppliers to consign multiple inventory caches for each channel. We offer our clients the
opportunity to consolidate operations from a channel standpoint, as well as from a geographic
perspective. Our integrated, global information systems and international locations support client
business needs worldwide.
8
Product Management and Inspection Services. We also operate a coupon management system and
product management program. Coupons are managed and activated by a unique serial number thus
significantly reducing fraudulent activity. Our capabilities also extend into salvage operations,
allowing our clients to reclaim valuable raw materials and components from discontinued or obsolete
inventory.
We operate a test and repair center where we visually inspect items for cosmetic defects.
These items are put through rigorous testing that includes: functionality, durability, accessory
inspection and packaging. Items that pass the testing are repackaged and resold with a noted
exception of open-box merchandise. Items that fail the inspection are disassembled and working
spare parts are saved for future use in repairs.
Information Management. We have the ability to communicate with and transfer information to
and from our clients through a wide variety of technology services, including real-time web service
enabled data interfaces, file transfer methods and electronic data interchange. Our systems are
designed to capture, store and electronically forward to our clients critical information regarding
customer inquiries and orders, product shipments, inventory status (for example, levels of
inventory on hand, on backorder, on purchase order and inventory due dates to our warehouse),
product returns and other information. Our systems are capable of providing our clients with
customer inventory and order information for use in analyzing sales and marketing trends and
introducing new products. We also offer customized reports and data analyses based upon specific
client needs to assist them in their budgeting and business decision process.
Financial Services. Our financial services are divided into two major areas: 1) billing,
credit, collection and cash application services for B2B clients and 2) fraud review, chargeback
management and processing and settlement credit card services for B2C clients.
We offer secure credit and collections services for both B2B and B2C businesses.
Specifically, for B2C clients, we offer secure credit card processing related services for orders
made via a client web site or through our customer contact center. We offer manual credit card
order review as an additional level of fraud protection. We also calculate sales taxes, goods and
services taxes or value added taxes, if applicable, for numerous taxing authorities and on a
variety of products. Using third-party leading-edge fraud protection services and risk management
systems, we can offer high levels of security and reduce the level of risk for client transactions.
For B2B clients, we offer full-service accounts receivable management and collection
capabilities, including the ability to generate customized computer-generated invoices in our
clients names. We assist clients in reducing accounts receivable and days sales outstanding, while
minimizing costs associated with maintaining an in-house collections staff. We offer electronic
credit services in the format of EDI and XML communications direct from our clients to their
vendors, suppliers and retailers.
Professional Consulting Services. As part of the tailored solution for our clients, we offer
a full team of experts specifically designated to focus on our clients businesses. Team members
play a consultative role, providing constructive evaluation, analysis and recommendations for the
clients business. This team creates customized solutions and devises plans that will increase
efficiencies and produce benefits for the client when implemented.
Comprised of industry experts from top-tier consulting firms and industry market leaders, our
team of professional consultants provides client service focus and eCommerce, customer care,
logistics and distribution expertise. They have built solutions for Fortune 1000 and Global 2000
market leaders in a wide range of industries, including multi-channel retailers, apparel,
technology, telecommunications, cosmetics, aviation, housewares, high-value collectibles, sporting
goods, pharmaceuticals and several more. Focusing on the evolving infrastructure needs of major
corporations and their business initiatives, our team has a solid track record providing consulting
services in the areas of interactive marketing eCommerce, supply chain management, distribution and
fulfillment, technology interfacing, logistics and customer support.
Technology Collaboration. Our suite of technology services designed to integrate our
technology platform with our clients and their business partners encompasses a wide range of
business functions from order processing and inventory reporting to rich content management
9
EntentePartnerConnect is a data repository and retrieval service for providing our clients
with access to comprehensive product and service information across a wide variety of product and
service categories. This information is aggregated from multiple sources including PFS business
partners such as Etilize that specialize in creating product content in certain categories. We
also rely on other relationships and public-domain information sources to supply raw data for this
service. Access to this information is provided through technology interfaces and web sites
created using PFSwebs End2End eCommerce® platform. We also provide the
EntentePartnerConnect service to our wholly-owned subsidiary eCOST via the eCOST.com® web site
enabling the effective merchandising of the wide-range of products offered on eCOST.com®. The
information available from EntentePartnerConnect for additional product categories offers eCOST
the opportunity to increase revenues through an expanded product offering and potential future
product category expansion.
Our collaboration technologies operate in an open systems environment and feature the use of
industry-standard XML and SOA web services, enabling customized e-commerce solutions with minimal
changes to a clients systems or our Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. The result is a
faster implementation process. We also support information exchange methods such as FTP, EDI, MQ
Series, ALE, HTTP, and HTTPS.
Clients and Marketing
Our target clients include online retailers as well as leading technology and consumer goods
brands looking to quickly and efficiently implement or enhance business initiatives, adapt their
go-to-market strategies, or introduce new products or programs, without the burden of modifying or
expanding their technology, customer care, supply chain and logistics infrastructure. Our solutions
are applicable to a multitude of industries and company types and we have provided solutions for
such companies as:
IBM (printer supplies in several geographic areas), Xerox (printers and printer supplies),
Roots Canada LTD. (apparel), Hewlett-Packard (printers and computer networking equipment), Hawker
Beechcraft Corp. (FOM and time-definite logistics supporting parts distribution), Riverbed
Technologies (technology products) and LEGO Brand
Retail (toys) amongst many others.
We target potential clients through an extensive integrated marketing program that is
comprised of a variety of direct marketing techniques, email marketing initiatives, trade event
participation, search engine marketing, public relations and a sophisticated outbound tele-sales
lead generation model. We have also developed an intricate messaging matrix that defines our
various eCommerce and business process outsourcing solutions and products, the vehicles we utilize
to deliver marketing communication on these solutions/products and the target audience segments
that display a demand for these solutions/products. This messaging matrix allows us to deploy
highly targeted solution messages to selected key vertical industry segments where we feel that we
are able to provide significant service differentiation and value. We also pursue strategic
marketing alliances with consulting firms, software manufacturers and other logistics providers to
increase market awareness and generate referrals and customer leads.
Because of the highly complex nature of the solutions we provide, our clients demand
significant competence and experience from a variety of different business disciplines during the
sales cycle. As such, we utilize a selected member of our senior executive team to lead the design
and proposal development of each potential new client we choose to pursue. The senior executive is
supported by a select group of highly experienced individuals from our professional services group
with specific industry knowledge or experience to the solutions development process. We employ a
team of highly trained implementation managers whose responsibilities include the oversight and
supervision of client projects and maintaining high levels of client satisfaction during the
transition process between the various stages of the sales cycle and steady state operations.
Competition
We face competition from many different sources depending upon the type and range of services
requested by a potential client. Many other companies offer one or more of the same services we
provide on an individual basis. Our competitors include vertical outsourcers, which are companies
that offer a single function solution, such as call centers, public warehouses or credit card
processors. We occasionally compete with transportation logistics providers, known in the industry
as 3PLs and 4PLs (third or fourth party logistics providers), who offer product
10
management functions as an ancillary service to their primary transportation services. We also
compete against other eCommerce and business process outsourcing providers, who perform various
services similar to our solution offerings.
In many instances, we compete with the in-house operations of our potential clients
themselves. Occasionally, the operations departments of potential clients believe they can perform
the same services we do, at similar quality levels and costs, while others are reluctant to
outsource business functions that involve direct customer contact. We cannot be certain we will be
able to compete successfully against these or other competitors in the future.
Although many of our competitors offer one or more of our services, we believe our primary
competitive advantage is our ability to offer a wide array of customized services that cover a
broad spectrum of eCommerce and business processes, including web-site design and hosting, kitting
and assembly, order processing and shipment, credit card payment processing and customer service,
thereby eliminating any need for our clients to coordinate these services from many different
providers. We believe we can differentiate ourselves by offering our clients a very broad range of
eCommerce and business process services that address, in many cases, the entire value chain, from
demand to delivery.
We also compete on the basis of many other important additional factors, including:
|
|
|
operating performance and reliability; |
|
|
|
|
ease of implementation and integration; |
|
|
|
|
experience of the people required to successfully and efficiently design and implement
solutions; |
|
|
|
|
experience operating similar solutions dynamically; |
|
|
|
|
leading edge technology capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
global reach; and |
|
|
|
|
price. |
We believe we can compete favorably with respect to many of these factors. However, the market
for our services is competitive and continually evolving, and we may not be able to compete
successfully against current and future competitors.
MASTER DISTRIBUTOR SEGMENT
Our Supplies Distributors subsidiaries act as a master distributor of product for IPS and
certain other clients. In this capacity, we purchase from IPS or other manufacturers and resell to
their channel partners and end users.
Through Supplies Distributors, we can create and implement client inventory solutions, which
may enable manufacturers to remove inventory and receivables from their balance sheets through the
use of third party financing. We have years of experience in dealing with the issues related to
inventory ownership, secure inventory management, replenishment and product distribution. We can
offer prospective clients a management solution for the entire customer relationship, including
ownership of inventory and receivables. Through CIP, we utilize technology resources to time the
replenishment purchase of inventory with the simultaneous sale of product to the end user. All
interfaces are done electronically and almost all processes regarding the financial transactions
are automated, creating significant supply chain advantages.
We are experienced in the complex legal, accounting and governmental control issues that can
be hurdles in the successful implementation of working capital financing programs. Our knowledge
and experience help clients achieve supply chain benefits while reducing inventory-carrying costs.
Substantial benefits and improvement to a companys balance sheet can be achieved through these
working capital solutions.
While
we generally recognize product revenue as a result of our inventory ownership through these
relationships, operationally this segment is virtually the same as our eCommerce and Business
Process Outsourcing Segment. See the preceding discussion for an overview of that segment.
11
ONLINE DISCOUNT RETAILER SEGMENT
Through eCOST.com®, we operate a leading multi-category online discount retailer of high
quality new, close-out and recertified brand-name merchandise. We currently offer approximately
300,000 products in several primary merchandise categories, including computers, networking,
electronics and entertainment, TVs, monitors and projectors, cameras and camcorders, memory and
storage, For the Home and sports and leisure. Additionally, we offer several other categories of
products and services to consumer and small business customers through what we believe is a unique
and convenient buying experience, offering multiple shopping formats: every day low price and our
proprietary Bargain Countdown®, Outrageous Offer, Secret Sale and Make an Offer. This combination
of shopping formats helps attract value-conscious customers to our eCOST.com website who are
looking for high quality products at low prices. Additionally, we offer a fee-based membership
program to develop customer loyalty by providing subscribers exclusive access to preferential
offers and free freight offers. We also provide rapid response customer service utilizing a
strategically located distribution center and third-party fulfillment providers, as well as
customer support from online and on-call sales representatives. We offer suppliers an efficient
sales channel for merchandise in all stages of the product life cycle. We carry products from
leading manufacturers such as Sony, JVC, Canon, Hewlett-Packard, Denon, Cuisinart, Sennheiser, Garmin,
Panasonic, Toshiba and Microsoft and have access to a broad and deep selection of merchandise,
including new and deeply discounted close-out and recertified brand-name merchandise.
Our Strengths
We have developed a differentiated business model, which provides our customers and vendors
with numerous benefits. We provide consumers and businesses with quick and convenient access to
high quality, new, close-out and recertified brand-name merchandise at discount prices similar to a
traditional discount retailer without the stocking limitations and store location constraints. We
believe we are unlike many online retailers because we market multiple merchandise categories and
product types, serve both small businesses and consumers and offer multiple ways to purchase
products: every day low price and our proprietary Bargain Countdown®, Outrageous Offer, Secret Sale
and Make an Offer.
We offer the following key benefits to customers shopping on our website:
|
|
|
Broad and deep product selection. We sell high quality
products across a broad selection of merchandise
categories. Most of the products offered on our website
are from well-known, brand-name manufacturers. We
currently offer approximately 300,000 different products
in several categories. Our product offerings are updated
continually to reflect new product trends, keeping our
merchandise selection relevant for our customers so they
continue to visit our website. |
|
|
|
|
Compelling price-to-value proposition. As part of our
strategy to appeal to the high frequency value-oriented
shopper, we offer low prices on new products and deeper
discounts on our assortment of close-out and recertified
merchandise. We employ aggressive promotional strategies
to provide incentives for our customers to purchase
merchandise on our website and build customer loyalty. We
also offer a fee-based membership program to reward
customer loyalty by providing exclusive access to
preferential offers and free freight to members.
. |
|
|
|
|
Multiple shopping formats on our website. We appeal to a
broad customer base by offering multiple shopping formats
designed to attract frequent visits to our website: every
day low price and our proprietary Bargain Countdown®,
Outrageous Offer, Secret Sale and Make an Offer. For the
shopper who wants new and recently released products from
leading manufacturers, we offer discounted merchandise in
an everyday low price format. For the bargain shopper
interested in close-out and recertified merchandise, we
market products using our Bargain Countdown® format, which
features time- and quantity-limited offers of selected
merchandise that are more deeply discounted. Multiple
times weekly we create a frenzied shopping environment by
offering very limited quantity offers at significantly
discounted prices through our Outrageous Offer and Secret
Sale shopping formats. These formats are primarily
targeted to attract new customers to eCOST.com. For final
unit sales of an item we also offer a Make an Offer
shopping format where consumers can offer a price of their
choosing and we subsequently decide to accept or decline
the offer. |
12
|
|
|
Rapid response order fulfillment. We ship a majority of
customer orders from inventory at our distribution
facility located in Memphis, Tennessee. We
also utilize virtual warehouse technology to access
merchandise that is not in stock at our distribution
facility. |
|
|
|
|
Responsive customer service and positive shopping
experience. We believe our customer service differentiates
the buying experience for our customers. Our experienced
team of inbound sales representatives and customer service
representatives assist our consumer customers by telephone
and e-mail. We also have relationship managers who are
assigned to many of our small business customers to
service their needs and increase future sales
opportunities. Our website contains helpful features such
as in-depth product information, inventory levels and
order status. In addition, we continually monitor website
traffic and order activity and periodically update our
website to enhance the shopping experience for our
customers. |
|
|
|
|
Appealing features for small business customers. We offer
our small business customers dedicated relationship
managers to provide personalized service to their unique
business needs. |
We provide manufacturers and other vendors with a convenient channel to sell both large and
small quantities of new, close-out and recertified inventory. We offer manufacturers and vendors
the following key benefits:
|
|
|
Single point of distribution. Manufacturers and other
vendors often use separate channels to sell new,
recertified and close-out products because most retailers
offer products in only one stage of the product life
cycle. Through our multiple shopping formats, we offer
manufacturers and other vendors the flexibility to use
eCOST.com to sell products in a brand sensitive manner in
any stage of the product life cycle. |
|
|
|
|
Efficient distribution and sales channel. Our centralized
distribution capability reduces vendor costs in shipping
product to us. Our ability to rapidly sell inventory is a
benefit to those vendors that offer us protection against
price erosion. Our centralized product management and
feedback to vendors on product sell-through and inventory
position allow vendors to efficiently monitor product
movement and placement, eliminating the need for frequent
visits by vendor representatives to physical retail
locations. |
|
|
|
|
Customized manufacturer stores. With our in-house design
and merchandising team, we provide manufacturers the
opportunity to showcase their full assortment of products
and accessories by establishing virtual stores on our
website that are specific to individual manufacturers. We
believe this allows manufacturers to maximize sales and
branding of their products. We promote these manufacturer
stores to our customer base through our integrated
marketing strategy, including targeted e-mails
highlighting a specific manufacturer and its products and
directing customers to that manufacturer store on our
website. |
|
|
|
|
Speed to market for newly released products. We respond
rapidly to new product releases from manufacturers through
our ability to quickly post and market new products on our
website and satisfy immediate customer demand through our
rapid response order fulfillment capabilities. |
Our Customers
We focus on consumers and business customers who often display similar consumer buying
characteristics. We believe our consumer customers are savvy, online shoppers, who are brand and
price conscious, and interested in new technology. Our business customers include small and medium
sized businesses that we believe are currently underserved by other multi-category online
retailers. While our business customer relationship managers focus on sales to small and medium
sized businesses who are seeking to purchase products for use in their business, they also service
certain resellers of technology products. We offer these small and medium sized business customers
superior and personalized customer service and new and current, close-out and recertified
merchandise at competitive prices.
13
Our Website
Our website is comprehensive, easy to use and provides an exciting shopping experience that
encourages customer loyalty and repeat visits. We strive to add hundreds of new products to our
online product mix weekly. Our website features high-quality product images, detailed product
information and manufacturer specifications, as well as highlights of best-selling products and
suggested accessories. We continually incorporate new technologies to improve the ease of use of
our website.
Currently, the products available on the everyday low price portion of our website are
organized into several primary product categories: computers, networking, electronics and
entertainment, TVs, monitors and projectors, cameras and camcorders, memory and storage, For the
Home and sports and leisure. We also offer the same products, if they meet certain criteria, on
the proprietary Bargain Countdown® section of our website where we feature more than 100 limited
time and limited quantity product deals across our broad merchandise categories. In addition to
being able to use keyword searches to locate specific products on our website, customers can browse
or search the products available on the everyday low price portion of our website by navigating the
subcategories contained in our primary product categories and our featured manufacturer product
showcases. Products that fall within more than one subcategory on our website are often posted on
more than one web page, which we believe increases the visibility of the products and assists the
customer in finding desired merchandise.
Everyday low price. Our multi-category merchandise assortment is available in an everyday low
price retail format. Products are organized by subcategory under each major category tab. Each
major category includes informative and shopper-friendly showcases organized by manufacturer, new
technology, best sellers, seasonal gift guides, and new products. This shopping format features
discounted new products and recently released products from leading manufacturers.
Bargain Countdown®. Our proprietary Bargain Countdown® shopping format offers more than 100
close-out, recertified and highly allocated deal products in limited quantities for a limited
time. The Bargain Countdown® feature is designed as a purchasing marketplace for consumers that
creates purchase urgency by uniquely indicating the quantity of items remaining for a current offer
and the time remaining to purchase the product. Based on the popularity of an offer, an animated
graphic icon will appear to alert the customer of the items current sales velocity. After the
offer has expired, the product is removed from Bargain Countdown® and may no longer be available at
the previously deeply discounted price. Our Bargain Countdown® shopping format encourages repeat
visits to our website due to the rapidly changing mix of merchandise deals, the animated graphics,
the unique collection of close-out deals and the search for bargains. We also have theme-based
Bargain Countdown® tabs throughout the year, including Holiday Countdown, Watches and Jewelry
Countdown, and Game of the Year Countdown. Our Clearance Countdown tab is primarily used to
liquidate overstocked and excess inventory across all product categories. Our Bargain Countdown
Platinum Club® format is a version of Bargain Countdown® and offers exclusive pricing on select
merchandise to our fee-based members.
Other key features of our website include: advanced search, online order status retrieval,
online payment, shipping alternatives, online registration for promotions and catalogs and online
extended service agreement recommendations.
As a commitment to our small and medium sized business customers, we offer them access to our
business customer relationship management team, credit terms of up to net 30-days for qualified
customers, software licensing, computer system configurations and extended payment term
alternatives.
Our Merchandise
We strive to offer our customers an expansive selection of varied types of merchandise and
currently offer approximately 300,000 products in several primary merchandise categories. While our
product offerings change on a regular basis due to product availability and customer demand, we
continually offer a wide variety of merchandise.
Computers and Networking. Our computers and networking product categories contains several
subcategories including systems, software and networking equipment. In these subcategories
customers can find products such as desktop, notebook and handheld computers; servers; personal
digital assistants; various hardware, including CD and
14
DVD drives and burners, flat screen monitors, color laser printers, scanners; and business,
education and entertainment software.
Electronics and Entertainment. Our electronics and entertainment product category contains
subcategories for DVD movies and gaming, audio systems, video systems and accessories. Within these
subcategories, customers can find products such as DVD players; DVD movies and gaming; personal
audio systems; speakers; digital video recorders that pause, rewind and replay live television;
digital music players and a variety of accessories such as cables, remote controls and headphones.
TVs, Monitors and Projectors. Our TVs, monitors and projectors product category contains
subcategories for monitors, projectors and accessories.
Cameras and Camcorders. Our cameras and camcorders product category contains products
including digital still cameras; video cameras and camcorders in MiniDV format; drawing tablets for
digital photo editing; digital photo and image editing software and photo printers.
Memory and Storage. Our memory and storage product category contains products including media
formats such as Blu Ray, CD and DVD R/W as well as flash and system memory.
For the Home. Our For the Home product category offers customers the ability to shop in
subcategories dedicated to home and housewares, personal care, home improvement, outdoor,
automotive and apparel including watches and sunglasses. Within this portion of our website
consumers can find products such as traditional household appliances including blenders, toasters
and vacuum cleaners, professional quality cookware and gourmet kitchen appliances such as coffee
grinders.
Sports and Leisure. Our sports and leisure product category offers products that range from
various sports accessories for baseball, football and numerous other activities to toys, musical
instruments and wedding accessories.
We continually evaluate expanding into additional categories to attract new customers and
offer a broader variety of merchandise to our existing customers. We also plan to increase our
depth in our current categories by adding new subcategories, brands and products and continuing to
develop and increase the number of affiliate categories.
Sales and Marketing
We currently focus our advertising efforts on efficient and effective marketing campaigns
aimed at acquiring new customers, encouraging repeat purchases and establishing the eCOST.com
brand. Our online prospecting activities may include cost-per-click arrangements that include
displaying our products within various price comparison sites and search engines such as Shopzilla,
Microsoft Live Search Cashback and Google, strategic online banner advertising, affinity e-mail
programs and participation in various online affiliate marketing programs. From time to time we
test other prospecting vehicles including radio and magazine advertising. We send our current
customers targeted e-mails focused on new product and category launches, special promotions, and
product-related add-on and accessory offers, as well as cooperative manufacturer branding
campaigns.
Vendors
We purchase products for resale both directly from manufacturers and indirectly through
distributors and other sources, all of whom we consider our vendors. We provide vendors with a
convenient channel to sell both large and small quantities of new, closeout and recertified
inventory. We offer significant advantages for vendors, including a single point of distribution,
efficient channel relationships, customized manufacturer stores and speedy release of their newest
merchandise. Our vendors provide us with brand name new and current products, close-out models and
manufacturer recertified products. We also have arrangements with third-party providers through
which we receive commissions for products in certain categories, such as cellular phones and
service, as well as other marketing and promotional services generated through our eCOST.com
website.
15
We
offer products on our website from numerous third-party vendors. In general, we
agree to offer products on our website and the manufacturers agree to provide us with information
about their products and honor our customer service policies. We have established direct vendor
relationships with many key suppliers and intend to continue to seek direct relationships with
vendors and suppliers.
Competition
The market for our products is intensely competitive, rapidly evolving and has relatively low
barriers to entry. New competitors can launch new websites at relatively low cost. We believe that
competition in our market is based predominantly on:
|
|
|
price; |
|
|
|
|
product selection, quality and availability; |
|
|
|
|
shopping convenience; |
|
|
|
|
customer service; and |
|
|
|
|
brand recognition. |
We currently or potentially compete with a variety of companies that can be divided into
several broad categories:
|
|
|
other multi-category online retailers and liquidation e-tailers; |
|
|
|
|
online discount retailers of computer and consumer electronics merchandise such as Buy.com, NewEgg
and TigerDirect; |
|
|
|
|
consumer electronics and office supply superstores such as Best Buy, Office Depot, OfficeMax and
Staples; and |
|
|
|
|
manufacturers such as Apple, Dell, Gateway, Hewlett-Packard and IBM, who sell directly to customers. |
Our largest manufacturers have sold, and continue to intensify their efforts to sell, their
products directly to consumers. To the extent additional manufacturers adopt this selling format or
this trend becomes more prevalent, it could adversely affect our sales growth and profitability.
Intellectual Property
We have five trademarks and/or service marks that we consider to be material to the successful
operation of our business: eCOST®, eCOST.com®, eCOST.com Your Online Discount Superstore!®, Bargain
Countdown® and Bargain Countdown Platinum Club®. We currently use these marks in connection with
telephone, mail order, catalog, and online retail services, as well as with various business
services. We have registrations in the United States for eCOST® and eCOST.com® for telephone, mail
order, catalog, and online retail order services, and a registration for Bargain Countdown® for
online retail order services. We also have a registration in the United States for Bargain
Countdown Platinum Club® for business services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others
by means of a customer loyalty program featuring information, incentives, discounts and rewards. We
have registrations in Canada and in the United Kingdom for eCOST®, eCOST.com® , Bargain Countdown®
and eCOST.com Your Online Discount Superstore!® . We own an additional registration in Canada for
Bargain Countdown Platinum Club® .
We have received a patent from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for our proprietary
Bargain Countdown® technology, although we cannot provide any assurance that effective patent and
trademark protection will be available in all instances, including in other countries in which our
products and services may be available.
ALL BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Technology
We maintain advanced management information systems and have automated key business functions
using online, real-time or batch systems. These systems enable us to provide information concerning
sales, inventory status, customer payments and other operations that are essential for us and our
clients to efficiently manage
16
electronic commerce and supply chain business programs. Our systems are designed to scale
rapidly to handle the transaction processing demands of our clients and our growth.
We employ technology from a select group of vendors. For example, we deploy IBM e-servers and
network printers in appropriate models to run web site functions as well as order management and
distribution functions. We utilize Avaya Communication for telephone switch and call center
management functions and to interact with customers via voice, e-mail or chat. Avaya Communication
technology also allows us to share web pages between customers and our service representatives. We
have the ability to transmit and receive voice, data and video simultaneously on a single network
connection to a customer to more effectively serve that customer for our client. Clients interest
in using this technology stems from its ability to allow shoppers to consult with known experts in
a way that the customer chooses prior to purchasing. Our sophisticated computer-telephony
integration has been accomplished by combining systems software from IBM and Avaya Communication
together with our own application development. We use AT&T for our private enterprise network and
long distance carrier. We use Oracles J.D. Edwards as the software provider for the primary ERP
applications that we use in our operational areas and financial areas. We use Dematic/Rapistan
Materials Handling Automation for our automated order selection, automated conveyor and
pick-to-light (inventory retrieval) systems, and Symbol Technologies/Telxon for our warehouse
radio frequency applications. Our Warehouse Management System (WMS) and Distribution Requirements
Planning (DRP) system have been developed in-house to meet the varied unique requirements of our
vertical markets. Both the WMS and DRP are tightly integrated to both the North American and
European deployments of our J.D. Edwards system.
Many internal infrastructures are not sufficient to support the explosive growth in
e-business, e-marketplaces, supply chain compression, distribution channel realignment and the
corresponding demand for real-time information necessary for strategic decision-making and product
fulfillment. To address this need, we have created PFSwebs End2End eCommerce® platform
to enable companies with little or no e-commerce infrastructure to speed their time to market and
minimize resource investment and risk, and allows all companies involved to improve the efficiency
of their supply chain.
Using the various components of our collaboration technology suite, we can assist our clients
in easily integrating their web sites or ERP systems to our systems for real-time web service
enabled transaction processing without regard for their hardware platform or operating system. This
high-level of systems integration allows our clients to automatically process orders, customer data
and other e-commerce information. We also can track information sent to us by the client as it
moves through our systems in the same manner a carrier would track a package throughout the
delivery process. Our systems enable us to track, at a detailed level, information received,
transmission timing, any errors or special processing required and information sent back to the
client.
We provide technology interfaces to our back-office applications including our customized J.D.
Edwards order management and fulfillment application. We utilize Gentran Integration Suite (GIS)
as our technology platform for Enterprise Application Integration with our clients and clients
trading partners. With GIS, we have greatly increased our ability to quickly design and deploy
customized B2B and B2C e-commerce solutions for our clients by utilizing a robust business process
modeling tool and a highly scalable operating infrastructure. This platform facilitates the
efficient and secure exchange of electronic business transactions/documents in a wide variety of
formats (i.e. XML, X.12 EDI, delimited text, IDOCS) and communication protocols (i.e. FTP/SFTP,
AS2/HTTP/HTTPS, AS1 SMTP, MQ Series and SOA Web Services).
We have invested in advanced telecommunications, computer telephony, electronic mail and
messaging, automated fax technology, IVR technology, barcode scanning, wireless technology, fiber
optic network communications and automated inventory management systems. We have also developed and
utilize telecommunications technology that provides for automatic customer call recognition and
customer profile recall for inbound customer service representatives.
The primary responsibility of our systems development team of IT professionals is directed at
implementing custom solutions for new clients and maintaining existing client relationships. Our
development team can also produce proprietary systems infrastructure to expand our capabilities in
circumstances where we cannot purchase standard solutions from commercial providers. We also
utilize temporary and/or contract resources when needed for additional capacity.
17
Our information technology operations and infrastructure are built on the premise of
reliability and scalability. We maintain diesel generators and un-interruptible power supply
equipment to provide constant availability to computer rooms, call centers and warehouses. Multiple
Internet service providers and redundant web servers provide for a high degree of availability to
web sites that interface with our systems. Capacity planning and upgrading is performed regularly
to allow for quick implementation of new clients and avoid time-consuming infrastructure upgrades
that could slow growth rates. In the event of a disastrous situation, we also have a Disaster
Recovery Plan that provides geographically separated and comparably equipped data centers that are
able to recover stored data in a reasonable and effective manner.
Strategy
We continue to maintain our simple but effective strategy statement to drive our actions, QGP.
This acronym stands for Quality, Growth and Profit. We believe that if we can achieve outstanding
performance on these three basic elements, they will provide for a stable foundation for our
future. As the evolution of our business model continues, we will remain focused on these three
fundamentals:
Quality: To exceed our clients service level requirements and enhance the value of their
brand while providing their customers a positive, memorable and efficient experience.
Growth: To increase our revenue and gross profit from its current levels. To aggressively
market simplified product messages to drive new clients and revenue and profit growth. To become a
larger company and create career and additional employment opportunities. Embrace strategic
partnering to accentuate strengths and minimize weaknesses.
Profit: To generate positive cash flow and continue to strive for consistent profitable
results. To increase the value of our company for all of its stakeholders while rewarding our team
members with challenging, fun and memorable life experiences.
The successful balance of the execution of these fundamental strategies is targeted to result
in the formation of a solid strategic and financial foundation and provide us a sustainable and
profitable business model for the future.
See Risk Factors for a complete discussion of risk factors related to our ability to achieve
our objectives and fulfill our business strategies.
Employees
As
of December 31, 2009, we had approximately 1,000 employees, of
which approximately 800 were
located in the United States. We have never suffered an interruption of business as a result of a
labor dispute. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. In the U.S., Canada and
Philippines, we are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements and while our European
subsidiaries are not a party to a collective-bargaining agreement, they are required to comply with
certain rules mentioned in collective bargaining agreements agreed upon by representatives of their
industry (logistics) and unions.
Our success in recruiting, hiring and training large numbers of skilled employees and
obtaining large numbers of hourly employees during peak periods for distribution and call center
operations is critical to our ability to provide high quality distribution and support services.
Call center representatives and distribution personnel receive feedback on their performance on a
regular basis and, as appropriate, are recognized for superior performance or given additional
training. Generally, our clients provide specific product training for our customer service
representatives and, in certain instances, on-site client personnel to provide specific technical
support. To maintain good employee relations and to minimize employee turnover, we strive to offer
competitive pay, hire primarily full-time employees who are eligible to receive a full range of
employee benefits, and provide employees with clear, visible career paths.
18
Internet Access to Reports
We maintain an Internet
website, www.pfsweb.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K (and amendments, if any, to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are
made available, free of charge, through the investor relations section of this website as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material, or furnish it to the Securities
and Exchange Commission. We also maintain an Internet website for our online discount retailer,
www.ecost.com. The information on these websites is not incorporated in this report.
Government Regulation
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign consumer protection laws, including laws
protecting the privacy of our customers personally identifiable information and other non-public
information and regulations prohibiting unfair and deceptive trade practices. Furthermore, the
growth and demand for online commerce has and may continue to result in more stringent consumer
protection laws that impose additional compliance burdens and greater penalties on online
companies. Moreover, there is a trend toward regulations requiring companies to provide consumers
with greater information regarding, and greater control over, how their personal data is used, and
requiring notification where unauthorized access to such data occurs. For example, many states
currently require us to notify each of our customers who are affected by any data security breach
in which an unauthorized person, such as a computer hacker, obtains such customers name and one or
more of the customers social security number, drivers license number, credit or debit card number
or other similar personal information. In addition, several jurisdictions, including foreign
countries, have adopted privacy-related laws that restrict or prohibit unsolicited email
promotions, commonly known as spam, and that impose significant monetary and other penalties for
violations. One such law, the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, became effective in the United States on
January 1, 2004 and imposes complex, burdensome and often ambiguous requirements in connection with
our sending commercial email to our customers and potential customers. Moreover, in an effort to
comply with these laws, Internet service providers may increasingly block legitimate marketing
emails. These consumer protection laws may become more stringent in the future and could result in
substantial compliance costs and could interfere with the conduct of our business.
We collect sales or other similar taxes for shipments of goods in certain states. One or more
local, state or foreign jurisdictions may seek to impose sales tax collection obligations on us and
other out-of-state companies that engage in online commerce. If sales tax obligations are
successfully imposed upon us by a state or other jurisdiction, we could be exposed to substantial
tax liabilities for past sales and fines and penalties for failure to collect sales taxes and we
could suffer decreased sales in that state or jurisdiction as the effective cost of purchasing
goods from us increases for those residing in that state or jurisdiction. In addition, new
legislation or regulation, the application of laws and regulations from jurisdictions whose laws do
not currently apply to our business or the application of existing laws and regulations to the
Internet and commercial online services could result in significant additional taxes or regulatory
restrictions on our business. These taxes could have an adverse effect on our cash flows and
results of operations. Furthermore, there is a possibility that we may be subject to significant
fines or other payments for any past failures to comply with these requirements.
Our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected by any or
all of the following factors, in which event the trading price of our common stock could decline,
and you could lose part or all of your investment.
Risks Related to All Our Business Segments
Our business and future growth depend on our continued access to bank and commercial financing. An
uncertain or recessed economy may negatively impact our business, results of operations, financial
condition or liquidity.
During the past two years, the credit markets and the financial services industry have been
experiencing a period of unprecedented turmoil and upheaval characterized by the bankruptcy,
failure, collapse or sale of various financial
19
institutions and an unprecedented level of intervention from the United States and foreign
governments. An uncertain or recessed economy could also adversely impact our customers operations
or ability to maintain liquidity, which may negatively impact our business and results of
operations.
Our business and future growth currently depend on our ability to access bank and commercial
lines of credit. We currently depend on an aggregate of approximately $111 million in line of
credit facilities provided by various banks and commercial lenders. These lines of credit currently
mature in at various dates through May 2011 and are secured by substantially all our assets. Our
ability to renew our line of credit facilities depends upon various factors, including the
availability of bank loans and commercial credit in general, as well as our financial condition and
prospects. Therefore, we cannot guarantee that these credit facilities will continue to be
available beyond their current maturities on reasonable terms or at all. Our inability to renew or
replace our credit facilities or find alternative financing would materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition, operating results and cash flow.
Our clients and customers may be unable to pay us for our products and services
Our clients and customers include some companies that may from time to time encounter
financial difficulties, especially in light of the current economic environment and the turmoil in
the credit markets. If a clients or customers financial difficulties become severe, they may be
unwilling or unable to pay our invoices in the ordinary course of business, which could adversely
affect collections of both our accounts receivable and unbilled services. The bankruptcy of a
client or customer with a substantial account receivable could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if a client or customer declares
bankruptcy after paying us certain invoices, a court may determine that we are not properly
entitled to that payment and may require repayment of some or all of the amount we received, which
could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We anticipate incurring significant expenses in the foreseeable future, which may reduce our
ability to achieve or maintain profitability.
To reach our business growth objectives, we may increase our operating and marketing expenses,
as well as capital expenditures. To offset these expenses, we will need to generate additional
profitable business. If our revenue grows slower than either we anticipate or our clients
projections indicate, or if our operating and marketing expenses exceed our expectations, we may
not generate sufficient revenue to be profitable or be able to sustain or increase profitability on
a quarterly or an annual basis in the future. Additionally, if our revenue grows slower than either
we anticipate or our clients projections indicate, we may incur unnecessary or redundant costs and
our operating results could be adversely affected.
Changes to financial accounting standards may affect our reported results of operations.
We prepare our financial statements to conform to United States generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP. GAAP is subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board,
the SEC and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting policies. A change
in those policies can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our
reporting of transactions that were completed before a change is announced. Accounting rules
affecting many aspects of our business, including rules relating to accounting for revenue
recognition, arrangements involving multiple deliverables, and
operating leases, have recently been revised or are
currently under review. Changes to those rules or current interpretation of those rules may have a
material adverse effect on our reported financial results or on the way we conduct our business.
We operate with significant levels of indebtedness and are required to comply with certain
financial and non-financial covenants; we are required to maintain a minimum level of subordinated
loans to our subsidiary Supplies Distributors; and we have guaranteed certain indebtedness and
obligations of our subsidiaries Supplies Distributors and eCOST.
As of December 31, 2009, our total credit facilities outstanding, including debt, capital
lease obligations and our vendor accounts payable related to financing of IPS product inventory,
was approximately $54.2 million. Certain of the credit facilities have maturity dates in calendar
year 2011, but are classified as current liabilities in our
20
consolidated financial statements. We cannot provide assurance that our credit facilities will
be renewed by the lending parties. Additionally, these credit facilities include both financial and
non-financial covenants, many of which also include cross default provisions applicable to other
agreements. These covenants also restrict our ability to transfer funds among our various
subsidiaries, which may adversely affect the ability of our subsidiaries to operate their
businesses or comply with their respective loan covenants. We cannot provide assurance that we will
be able to maintain compliance with these covenants. Any non-renewal or any default under any of
our credit facilities would have a material adverse impact upon our business and financial
condition. In addition we have provided $5.0 million of subordinated indebtedness to Supplies
Distributors as of December 31, 2009. The maximum level of this subordinated indebtedness to
Supplies Distributors that may be provided without approval from our lenders is $5.5 million. The
restrictions on increasing this amount without lender approval may limit our ability to comply with
certain loan covenants or further grow and develop Supplies Distributors business. We have
guaranteed most of the indebtedness of Supplies Distributors. Furthermore, we are obligated to
repay any over-advance made to Supplies Distributors by its lenders to the extent Supplies
Distributors is unable to do so. We have also guaranteed eCOSTs $7.5 million credit line, as well
as certain of its vendor trade payables. We currently expect that it may be necessary to provide
additional guarantees of certain eCOST vendor trade payables in the future.
We are dependent on our key personnel, and we need to hire and retain skilled personnel to sustain
our business.
Our performance is highly dependent on the continued services of our executive officers and
other key personnel, the loss of any of whom could materially adversely affect our business. In
addition, we need to attract and retain other highly-skilled, technical and managerial personnel
for whom there is intense competition. We cannot assure you we will be able to attract and retain
the personnel necessary for the continuing growth of our business. Our inability to attract and
retain qualified technical and managerial personnel could materially adversely affect our ability
to maintain and grow our business significantly.
We are subject to risks associated with our international operations.
We currently operate
a distribution center in Liege, Belgium with approximately 150,000
square feet and a distribution center in Toronto, Canada with
approximately 23,000 square feet, both of which currently have excess capacity.
We also operate a facility in the Philippines with approximately
7,000 square feet to provide call center and
customer service functions, technical support, product management and sales activities. We cannot
assure you that we will be successful in expanding in these or any additional international
markets. In addition to the uncertainty regarding our ability to generate revenue from foreign
operations and expand our international presence, there are risks inherent in doing business
internationally, including:
|
|
|
changing regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
legal uncertainty regarding foreign laws, tariffs and other trade barriers; |
|
|
|
|
political instability; |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences; |
|
|
|
|
foreign currency fluctuations; and |
|
|
|
|
cultural differences. |
Any one or more of these factors could materially adversely affect our business in a number of
ways, such as increased costs, operational difficulties and reductions in revenue.
We are uncertain about our need for and the availability of additional funds.
Our future capital needs are difficult to predict. We may require additional capital to take
advantage of unanticipated opportunities, including strategic alliances and acquisitions and to
fund capital expenditures, or to respond to changing business conditions and unanticipated
competitive pressures. We may also require additional funds to finance operating losses. Should
these circumstances arise, our existing cash balance and credit facilities may be insufficient and
we may need to raise additional funds either by borrowing money or issuing additional equity. We
cannot assure you that such resources will be adequate or available for all of our future financing
needs. Our inability to finance our growth, either internally or externally, may limit our growth
potential and our ability to execute our business strategy. If we are successful in completing an
additional equity financing, this could result in further dilution to our shareholders or reduce the market value of our common stock.
21
We may engage in future strategic alliances or acquisitions that could dilute our existing
shareholders, cause us to incur significant expenses or harm our business.
We may review strategic alliance or acquisition opportunities that would complement our
current business or enhance our technological capabilities. Integrating any newly acquired
businesses, technologies or services may be expensive and time-consuming. To finance any
acquisitions, it may be necessary for us to raise additional funds through borrowing money or
completing public or private financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are
favorable to us and, in the case of equity financings, may result in dilution to our shareholders.
We may not be able to operate any acquired businesses profitably or otherwise implement our growth
strategy successfully. If we are unable to integrate any newly acquired entities or technologies
effectively, our operating results could suffer. Future acquisitions could also result in
incremental expenses and the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, any of which could harm
our operating results.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately
report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, current and potential shareholders
could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which could harm our business, and the trading
price of our common stock.
As of December 31, 2009 and based on the current requirements, and our public float, we were
not required to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to obtain a
report by our independent auditors opining on the effectiveness of our internal controls over
financial reporting. We will be subject to this independent auditor requirement for the year ending
December 31, 2010. If we fail to correct any issues in the design or operating effectiveness of
internal controls over financial reporting or fail to prevent fraud, current and potential
shareholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which could harm our business and
the trading price of our common stock.
Delivery of our and our clients products could be delayed or disrupted by factors beyond our
control, and we could lose customers and clients as a result.
We rely upon third party carriers for timely delivery of our and our clients product
shipments. As a result, we are subject to carrier disruptions and increased costs due to factors
that are beyond our control, including employee strikes, inclement weather and increased fuel
costs. Any failure to deliver products to our and our clients customers in a timely and accurate
manner may damage our reputation and brand and could cause us to lose customers and clients. We
cannot be sure that our relationships with third party carriers will continue on terms favorable to
us, if at all. If our relationship with any of these third party carriers is terminated or impaired
or if any of these third parties is unable to deliver products, we would be required to use
alternative carriers for the shipment of our and our clients products to customers. We may be
unable to engage alternative carriers on a timely basis or on favorable terms, if at all. Potential
adverse consequences include:
|
|
|
reduced visibility of order status and package tracking; |
|
|
|
|
delays in order processing and product delivery; |
|
|
|
|
increased cost of delivery, resulting in reduced margins; and |
|
|
|
|
reduced shipment quality, which may result in damaged products and customer
dissatisfaction. |
Our profitability could be adversely affected if the operation of our distribution or call center
facilities were interrupted or shut down as the result of a natural disaster.
We operate a majority of our distribution facilities in or around the Memphis, Tennessee area
and our call center operations are centered in Plano, Texas. Any natural disaster or other serious
disruption to these facilities due to fire, tornado, flood or any other cause would substantially
disrupt our operations and would impair our ability to adequately service our customers. In
addition, we could incur significantly higher costs during the time it takes for us to reopen or
replace any one or more of these facilities, which may or may not be reimbursed by insurance. As a
result, disruption at one or more of these facilities could adversely affect our profitability.
22
We may be a party to litigation involving our e-commerce intellectual property rights. If
third parties claim we are infringing their intellectual property rights, we could incur
significant litigation costs, be required to pay damages, or change our business or incur licensing
expenses.
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patent
and other intellectual property rights. We may be a party to intellectual property litigation in
the future to protect our trade secrets or know-how. United States patent applications are
confidential until a patent is issued and most technologies are developed in secret. Accordingly,
we are not, and cannot be, aware of all patents or other intellectual property rights of which our
services may pose a risk of infringement. Others asserting rights against us could force us to
defend ourselves or our customers against alleged infringement of intellectual property rights. We
could incur substantial costs to prosecute or defend any such litigation.
Third parties have asserted, and may in the future assert, that our business or the
technologies we use infringe on their intellectual property rights. As a result, we may be subject
to intellectual property legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We cannot
predict whether third parties will assert claims of infringement in the future or whether any
future claims will prevent us from offering popular products or services. If we are found to
infringe, we may be required to pay monetary damages, which could include treble damages and
attorneys fees for any infringement that is found to be willful, and either be enjoined or
required to pay ongoing royalties with respect to any technologies found to infringe. Further, as a
result of infringement claims either against us or against those who license technology to us, we
may be required, or deem it advisable, to develop non-infringing technology, which could be costly
and time consuming, or enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing
agreements, if required, may be unavailable on terms that are acceptable, or at all. If a third
party successfully asserts an infringement claim against us and we are enjoined or required to pay
monetary damages or royalties or we are unable to develop suitable non-infringing alternatives or
license the infringed or similar technology on reasonable terms on a timely basis, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be materially harmed.
A breach of our e-commerce security measures could reduce demand for its services. Credit card
fraud and other fraud could adversely affect our business.
A requirement of the continued growth of e-commerce is the secure transmission of confidential
information over public networks. A party who is able to circumvent our security measures could
misappropriate proprietary information or interrupt our operations. Any compromise or elimination
of our security could reduce demand for our services.
We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against
security breaches or to address any problem they may cause. Because our activities involve the
storage and transmission of proprietary information, such as credit card numbers, security breaches
could damage our reputation, cause us to lose clients, impact our ability to attract new clients
and we could be exposed to litigation and possible liability. Our security measures may not prevent
security breaches, and failure to prevent security breaches may disrupt our operations. In certain
circumstances, we do not carry insurance against the risk of credit card fraud and other fraud, so
the failure to adequately control fraudulent transactions on either our behalf or our clients
behalf could increase our expenses.
We may be liable for misappropriation of our customers and our clients customers personal
information.
Data security laws are becoming more stringent in the United States and abroad. Third parties
are engaging in increased cyber attacks against companies doing business on the Internet and
individuals are increasingly subjected to identity and credit card theft on the Internet. If third
parties or unauthorized employees are able to penetrate our network security or otherwise
misappropriate our or our clients customers personal information or credit card information, or
if we give third parties or our employees improper access to customers personal information or
credit card information, we could be subject to liability. This liability could include claims for
unauthorized purchases with credit card information, impersonation or other similar fraud claims.
This liability could also include claims for other misuses of personal information, including
unauthorized marketing purposes. Liability for misappropriation of this information could decrease
our profitability. In such circumstances, we also could be liable for failing to provide timely
notice of a data security breach affecting certain types of personal information. In addition, the
Federal Trade Commission and state agencies have brought numerous enforcement actions against
23
Internet companies for alleged deficiencies in those companies privacy and data security
practices, and they may continue to bring such actions. We could incur additional expenses if new
regulations regarding the collection, use or storage of personal information are introduced or if
government agencies investigate our privacy or security practices.
We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide the
security and authentication necessary to effect secure transmission of sensitive customer
information such as customer credit card numbers. Advances in computer capabilities, new
discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments may result in a compromise
or breach of the algorithms that we use to protect customer transaction data. If any such
compromise of security were to occur, it could subject us to liability, damage our reputation and
diminish the value of our brand-name. A party who is able to circumvent the security measures could
misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in operations. We may be required to
expend significant capital and other resources to protect against such security breaches or to
alleviate problems caused by such breaches. Our security measures are designed to prevent security
breaches, but our failure to prevent such security breaches could subject us to liability, damage
our reputation and diminish the value of our brand-name.
We also may provide non-secured channels for customers to communicate. Despite the increased
security risks, customers may use such channels to send personal information and other sensitive
data. In addition, phishing incidents are on the rise. Phishing involves an online companys
customers being tricked into providing their credit card numbers or account information to someone
pretending to be the online companys representative. Such incidents have recently given rise to
litigation against online companies for failing to take sufficient steps to police against such
activities by third parties, and may discourage customers from using online services.
We are subject to a dispute with a municipal authority, which, if not resolved in our favor, may
materially adversely affect our results of operations.
We receive municipal tax abatements in certain locations. During 2004 we received notice from
a municipal authority that we did not satisfy certain criteria necessary to maintain the
abatements. In December 2006 we received notice that the municipal authority planned to make an
adjustment to our tax abatement. We have disputed the adjustment, but if
the dispute is not resolved favorably, additional taxes of approximately $1.7 million could be
assessed against us.
Risks Related to Our PFS and Supplies Distributors Operating Segments
Our service fee revenue and gross margin is dependent upon our clients business and transaction
volumes and our costs; many of our client service agreements are terminable by the client at will;
we may incur financial penalties if we fail to meet contractual service levels under certain client
service agreements.
Our service fee revenue is primarily transaction based and fluctuates with the volume of
transactions or level of sales of the products by our clients for whom we provide transaction
management services. If we are unable to retain existing clients or attract new clients or if we
dedicate significant resources to clients whose business does not generate sufficient revenue or
whose products do not generate substantial customer sales, our business may be materially adversely
affected. Moreover, our ability to estimate service fee revenue for future periods is substantially
dependent upon our clients and our own projections, the accuracy of which has been, and will
continue to be, unpredictable. Therefore, our planning for client activity and targeted goals for
service fee revenue and gross margin may be materially adversely affected by incomplete, delayed or
inaccurate projections. In addition, many of our service agreements with our clients are terminable
by the client at will. Therefore, we cannot assure you that any of our clients will continue to use
our services for any period of time. The loss of a significant amount of service fee revenue due to
client terminations could have a material adverse effect on our ability to cover our costs and thus
on our profitability. Certain of our client service agreements contain minimum service level
requirements and impose financial penalties if we fail to meet such requirements. The imposition of
a substantial amount of such penalties could have a material adverse effect on our business and
operations.
24
Our business is subject to the risk of customer and supplier concentration.
For the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, a U.S. government agency, a technology company,
and a consumer products company represented approximately 7%, 15% and 10%, respectively, and
approximately 37%, 10% and 6%, respectively, of our total service fee revenue, excluding
pass-through revenue. Our activity under our contract with the U.S. government agency concluded in
the second quarter of 2009. PFS currently operates three distinct
geographical contract arrangements with the technology company, which
are aggregated in the service fee revenue percentages above. During 2010, the technology company
notified PFS that it is not renewing two of its three contracts with
PFS expiring during 2010. The non-renewal of these contracts has had, and may continue to have, a
material adverse effect upon our business.
A substantial portion of our Supplies Distributors product revenue is generated by sales of
product purchased under master distributor agreements with InfoPrint Solutions Company (IPS).
These agreements are terminable at will and no assurance can be given that IPS will continue the
master distributor agreements with Supplies Distributors. Supplies Distributors does not have its
own sales force and relies upon IPSs sales force and product demand generation activities for its
sale of IPS product. Discontinuance of such activities would have a material adverse effect on
Supplies Distributors business and our overall financial condition.
Sales by Supplies Distributors to two customers accounted for approximately 30% of Supplies
Distributors total product revenue for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (16% and
15% of our consolidated net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively).
The loss of any one or more of such customers, or non-payment of any material amount by these or
any other customer, would have a material adverse effect upon Supplies Distributors business.
Our operating results are materially impacted by our client mix and the seasonality of their
business.
Our business is materially impacted by our client mix and the seasonality of their business.
Based upon our current client mix and their current projected business volumes, we anticipate our
service fee revenue business activity will be at its lowest in the first quarter of our fiscal year
and that our master distributor product revenue business activity will be at its highest in the
fourth quarter of our fiscal year. We are unable to predict how the seasonality of future clients
business may affect our quarterly revenue and whether the seasonality may change due to
modifications to a clients business. As such, we believe that results of operations for a
quarterly period may not be indicative of the results for any other quarter or for the full year.
Our systems may not accommodate significant growth in our number of clients.
Our success depends on our ability to handle a large number of transactions for many different
clients in various product categories. We expect that the volume of transactions will increase
significantly as we expand our operations. If this occurs, additional stress will be placed upon
the network hardware and software that manages our operations. We cannot assure you of our ability
to efficiently manage a large number of transactions. If we are not able to maintain an appropriate
level of operating performance, we may develop a negative reputation, and impair existing and
prospective client relationships and our business would be materially adversely affected.
We may not be able to recover all or a portion of our start-up costs associated with one or more of
our clients.
We generally incur start-up costs in connection with the planning and implementation of
business process solutions for our clients. Although we generally attempt to recover these costs
from the client in the early stages of the client relationship, or upon contract termination if the
client terminates without cause prior to full amortization of these costs, there is a risk that the
client contract may not fully cover the start-up costs. To the extent start-up costs exceed the
start-up fees received, certain excess costs will be expensed as incurred. Additionally, in
connection with new client contracts we generally incur capital expenditures associated with assets
whose primary use is related to the client solution. There is a risk that the contract may end
before expected and we may not recover the full amount of our capital costs.
25
Our revenue and margins may be materially impacted by client transaction volumes that differ from
client projections and business assumptions.
Our pricing for client transaction services, such as call center and fulfillment, is often
based upon volume projections and business assumptions provided by the client and our anticipated
costs to perform such work. In the event the actual level of activity or cost is substantially
different from the projections or assumptions, we may have insufficient or excess staffing,
incremental costs or other assets dedicated for such client that may negatively impact our margins
and business relationship with such client. In the event we are unable to meet the service levels
expected by the client, our relationship with the client will suffer and may result in financial
penalties and/or the termination of the client contract.
We face competition from many sources that could adversely affect our business.
Many companies offer, on an individual basis, one or more of the same services we do, and we
face competition from many different sources depending upon the type and range of services
requested by a potential client. Our competitors include vertical outsourcers, which are companies
that offer a single function, such as call centers, public warehouses or credit card processors. We
compete against transportation logistics providers who offer product management functions as an
ancillary service to their primary transportation services. We also compete against other business
process outsourcing providers, who perform many similar services as us. Many of these companies
have greater capabilities than we do for the single or multiple functions they provide. In many
instances, our competition is the in-house operations of its potential clients themselves. The
in-house operations of potential clients often believe that they can perform the same services we
do, while others are reluctant to outsource business functions that involve direct customer
contact. We cannot be certain that we will be able to compete successfully against these or other
competitors in the future.
Our sales and implementation cycles are highly variable and our ability to finalize pending
contracts may cause our operating results to vary widely.
The sales cycle for our services is variable, typically ranging between several months to up
to a year or longer from initial contact with the potential client to the signing of a contract.
Occasionally the sales cycle requires substantially more time. Delays in signing and executing
client contracts may affect our revenue and cause our operating results to vary widely. A potential
clients decision to purchase our services is discretionary, involves a significant commitment of
the clients resources and is influenced by intense internal and external pricing and operating
comparisons. To successfully sell our services, we generally must educate our potential clients
regarding the use and benefit of our services, which can require significant time and resources.
Consequently, the period between initial contact and the purchase of our services is often long and
subject to delays associated with the lengthy approval and competitive evaluation processes that
typically accompany significant operational decisions. Additionally, the time required to finalize
pending contracts and to implement our systems and integrate a new client can range from several
weeks to many months. Delays in signing and integrating new clients may affect our revenue and
cause our operating results to vary widely.
Our business could be adversely affected by a systems or equipment failure, whether that of us or
our clients.
Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our distribution facilities, customer
service centers, computer and telecommunications equipment and software systems against damage and
failures. Damage or failures could result from fire, power loss, equipment malfunctions, system
failures, natural disasters and other causes. If our business is interrupted either from accidents
or the intentional acts of others, our business could be materially adversely affected. In
addition, in the event of widespread damage or failures at our facilities, our short-term disaster
recovery and contingency plans and insurance coverage may not be sufficient.
Our clients businesses may also be harmed from any system or equipment failures we
experience. In that event, our relationship with these clients may be adversely affected, we may
lose these clients, our ability to attract new clients may be adversely affected and we could be
exposed to liability.
Interruptions could also result from the intentional acts of others, like hackers. If our
systems are penetrated by computer hackers, or if computer viruses infect our systems, our
computers could fail or proprietary information could be misappropriated.
26
If our clients suffer similar interruptions in their operations, for any of the reasons
discussed above or for others, our business could also be adversely affected. Many of our clients
computer systems interface with our systems. If our clients suffer interruptions in their systems,
the link to our systems could be severed and sales of the clients products could be slowed or
stopped.
Risks Related to the Business Process Outsourcing Industry
If the trend toward outsourcing does not continue, our business could be adversely affected.
Our business could be materially adversely affected if the trend toward outsourcing declines
or reverses, or if corporations bring previously outsourced functions back in-house. Particularly
during general economic downturns, businesses may bring in-house previously outsourced functions to
avoid or delay layoffs.
Our market is subject to rapid technological change and to compete we must continually enhance our
systems to comply with evolving standards.
To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the responsiveness,
functionality and features of our services and the underlying network infrastructure. If we are
unable to adapt to changing market conditions, client requirements or emerging industry standards,
our business could be adversely affected. The internet and e-commerce environments are
characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user requirements and preferences, frequent
new product and service introductions embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry
standards and practices that could render our technology and systems obsolete. Our success will
depend, in part, on our ability to both internally develop and license leading technologies to
enhance our existing services and develop new services. We must continue to address the
increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our clients and respond to technological advances
and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis. The development
of proprietary technology involves significant technical and business risks. We may fail to develop
new technologies effectively or to adapt our proprietary technology and systems to client
requirements or emerging industry standards.
Risks Related to eCOST, our Online Discount Retailer Segment
We may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability.
We have incurred continuing operating losses and may not be able to achieve or maintain
profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our ability to achieve or maintain profitability
depends on a number of factors, including our ability to:
|
|
|
increase sales; |
|
|
|
|
maintain and expand vendor relationships; |
|
|
|
|
obtain additional and increase existing trade credit with key suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
generate sufficient gross profit; and |
|
|
|
|
control costs and generate the expected synergies applicable to the merger. |
We may need additional financing and may not be able to obtain additional financing on favorable
terms or at all, which could increase our costs and limit our ability to grow.
We may need to obtain additional financing and there can be no assurance that we will be able
to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our failure to obtain
additional financing or our inability to obtain financing on acceptable terms will materially
adversely affect our ability to achieve profitability and grow our business.
Our operating results are difficult to predict.
Our operating results have fluctuated in the past and are likely to vary significantly in the
future based upon a number of factors, many of which we cannot control. We operate in a highly
dynamic industry and future results
27
could be subject to significant fluctuations. Revenue and expenses in future periods may be
greater or less than revenue and expenses in the immediately preceding period or in the comparable
period of the prior year. Therefore, period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not
necessarily a good indication of our future performance. Some of the factors that could cause our
operating results to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
price competition that results in lower sales volumes, lower profit margins, or net
losses; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to prevent credit card fraud and reduce chargeback activity; |
|
|
|
|
the amount, timing and impact of advertising and marketing costs; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully implement new technologies or software systems; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain sufficient financing; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the number of visitors to our website or our inability to convert those
visitors into customers; |
|
|
|
|
technical difficulties, including system or Internet failures; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the demand for our products or overstocking or under-stocking of
products; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in revenues and shipping costs, particularly during the holiday season; |
|
|
|
|
economic conditions generally or economic conditions specific to the Internet, online
commerce, the retail industry or the mail order industry; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of products that we sell; and |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in levels of inventory theft, damage or obsolescence. |
The failure to improve our financial and operating performance may result in a failure to comply
with our financial covenants.
In the event we are unable to increase our revenue and/or gross profit from our present levels
and do not achieve a sufficient level of operating efficiencies, we may fail to comply with one or
more of the financial covenants required under our working capital line of credit. In such event,
absent a waiver, the working capital lender would be entitled to accelerate all amounts outstanding
thereunder and exercise all other rights and remedies, including sale of collateral and payment
under the parent guaranty.
If we fail to accurately predict our inventory risk, our margins may decline as a result of
write-downs of our inventory due to lower prices obtained for older or obsolete products.
Some of the products we sell on our website are characterized by rapid technological change,
obsolescence and price erosion (for example, computer hardware, software and consumer electronics),
and because we may sometimes stock large quantities of particular types of inventory, inventory
reserves may be required or may subsequently prove insufficient, and additional inventory
write-downs may be required.
Increased product returns or a failure to accurately predict product returns could decrease our
revenues and impact profitability.
We make allowances for product returns based on historical return rates. We are responsible
for returns of certain products ordered through our website from our distribution center as well as
products that are shipped to our customers directly from our vendors. If our actual product returns
significantly exceed our allowances for returns, especially as we expand into new product
categories, our revenues and profitability could decrease. In addition, because our allowances are
based on historical return rates, the introduction of new merchandise categories, new products,
changes in our product mix, or other factors may cause actual returns to exceed return allowances,
perhaps significantly. Any policies intended to reduce the number of product returns may result in
customer dissatisfaction, increased credit card chargeback activity and fewer repeat customers.
Our ability to offer a broad selection of products at competitive prices is dependent on our
ability to maintain existing and build new relationships with manufacturers and vendors. We do not
have long-term agreements with our manufacturers or vendors and some of our manufacturers and
vendors compete directly with us.
We purchase products for resale both directly from manufacturers and indirectly through
distributors and other sources, all of whom we consider our vendors. We do not have any long-term
agreements with any of these vendors. Any agreements with vendors governing our purchase of
products are generally terminable by either party upon 30 days notice or less. In general, we
agree to offer products on our website and the vendors agree to provide us with
28
information about their products and honor our customer service policies. If we do not
maintain relationships with vendors on acceptable terms, including favorable product pricing and
vendor consideration, we may not be able to offer a broad selection of products or continue to
offer products at competitive prices, and customers may choose not to shop at our website. In
addition, some vendors may decide not to offer particular products for sale on the Internet, and
others may avoid offering their new products to retailers like us who offer a mix of close-out and
recertified products in addition to new products. From time to time, vendors may terminate our
right to sell some or all of our products, change the applicable terms and conditions of sale or
reduce or discontinue the incentives or vendor consideration that they offer. Any such termination
or the implementation of such changes could have a negative impact on our operating results.
Additionally, some products are subject to manufacturer or distributor allocation, which limits the
number of units of those products that are available to us and other resellers.
Our business is subject to the risk of supplier concentration.
Our business is dependent on sales of Hewlett Packard (HP) and HP-related products, which
represented approximately 44% of eCOSTs net revenues (11% of our consolidated revenues) in 2009
and 43% of eCOSTs net revenues (9% of our consolidated revenues) in 2008. If our ability to
purchase direct from HP is terminated or restricted, or if the demand for HP and HP-related
products declines, our business could be materially adversely affected.
We are dependent on the success of our advertising and marketing efforts, which are costly and may
not achieve desired results, and on our ability to attract customers on cost-effective terms.
Our revenues depend on our ability to advertise and market our products effectively. Increases
in the costs of advertising and marketing, including costs of online advertising, paper and postage
costs, costs and fees of third-party service providers and the costs of complying with applicable
regulations, may limit our ability to advertise and market our business without impacting our
profitability. If our advertising and marketing efforts prove ineffective or do not produce a
sufficient level of sales to cover their costs, or if we decrease our advertising or marketing
activities due to increased costs, restrictions enacted by regulatory agencies or for any other
reason, our revenues and profit margins may decrease. Our success depends on our ability to attract
customers on cost-effective terms. We have relationships with online services, search engines,
shopping engines, directories and other websites and e-commerce businesses through which we provide
advertising banners and other links that direct customers to our website. We expect to rely on
these relationships as significant sources of traffic to our website and to generate new customers.
If we are unable to develop or maintain these relationships on acceptable terms, our ability to
attract new customers on a cost-effective basis could be harmed. In addition, certain of our
existing online marketing agreements require us to pay fixed placement fees or fees for directing
visits to our eCOST website, neither of which may convert into sales.
Because we experience seasonal fluctuations in our revenues, our quarterly results may fluctuate.
Our business is moderately seasonal, reflecting the general pattern of peak sales for the
retail industry during the holiday shopping season. Typically, a larger portion of our revenues
occur during the first and fourth fiscal quarters. We believe that our historical revenue growth
makes it difficult to predict the effect of seasonality on our future revenues and results of
operations. In anticipation of increased sales activity during the first and fourth quarters, we
incur additional expenses, including higher inventory and staffing costs. If sales for the first
and fourth quarters do not meet anticipated levels, then increased expenses may not be offset which
could decrease our profitability. If we were to experience lower than expected sales during our
first or fourth quarters, for any reason, it would decrease our profitability.
Our business may be harmed by fraudulent activities on our website.
We have received in the past, and anticipate that we will receive in the future,
communications from customers due to purported fraudulent activities on our eCOST website. Negative
publicity generated as a result of fraudulent conduct by third parties could damage our reputation
and diminish the value of our brand name. Fraudulent activities on our eCOST website could also
subject us to losses. We expect to continue to receive requests from customers for reimbursement
due to purportedly fraudulent activities or threats of legal action if no reimbursement is made.
29
If we do not successfully expand our eCOST website and processing systems to accommodate higher
levels of traffic and changing customer demands, we could lose customers and our revenues could
decline.
To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features
of our website. If we fail to upgrade our website in a timely manner to accommodate higher volumes
of traffic, our website performance could suffer and we may lose customers. The Internet and the
e-commerce industry are subject to rapid technological change. If competitors introduce new
features and website enhancements embodying new technologies, or if new industry standards and
practices emerge, our existing eCOST website and systems may become obsolete or unattractive.
Developing our eCOST website and other systems entails significant technical and business risks. We
may face material delays in introducing new services, products and enhancements. If this happens,
customers may forgo the use of our eCOST website and use those of our competitors. We may use new
technologies ineffectively, or we may fail to adapt our website, transaction processing systems and
computer network to meet customer requirements or emerging industry standards.
If we fail to successfully expand our merchandise categories and product offerings in a
cost-effective and timely manner, our reputation and the value of our new and existing brands could
be harmed, customer demand for our products could decline and our profit margins could decrease.
Historically, we have generated the substantial majority of our revenues from the sale of
computer hardware, software and accessories and consumer electronics products. In recent years, we
have added several new product categories, including For the Home and sports and leisure. While
our merchandising platform has been incorporated into and tested in the online computer and
consumer electronics retail markets, we cannot predict with certainty whether it can be
successfully applied to other product categories. In addition, expansion of our business strategy
into new product categories may require us to incur significant marketing expenses, develop
relationships with new vendors and comply with new regulations. We may lack the necessary expertise
in a new product category to realize the expected benefits of that new category. These requirements
could strain managerial, financial and operational resources. Additional challenges that may affect
our ability to expand into new product categories include our ability to:
|
|
|
establish or increase awareness of new brands and product categories; |
|
|
|
|
acquire, attract and retain customers at a reasonable cost; |
|
|
|
|
achieve and maintain a critical mass of customers and orders across all product
categories; |
|
|
|
|
attract a sufficient number of new customers to whom new product categories are
targeted; |
|
|
|
|
successfully market new product offerings to existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
maintain or improve gross margins and fulfillment costs; |
|
|
|
|
attract and retain vendors to provide an expanded line of products to customers on
terms that are acceptable; and |
|
|
|
|
manage inventory in new product categories. |
We cannot be certain we will be able to successfully address any or all of these challenges in
a manner that will enable us to expand our business into new product categories in a cost-effective
or timely manner. If our new categories of products or services are not received favorably, or if
our suppliers fail to meet our customers expectations, our results of operations would suffer and
our reputation and the value of the applicable new brand and other brands could be damaged. The
lack of market acceptance of our new product categories or inability to generate satisfactory
revenues from any expanded product categories to offset our cost could harm our business.
Credit card fraud could materially adversely affect our business.
We do not currently carry insurance against the risk of credit card fraud, so the failure to
adequately control fraudulent credit card transactions could reduce our revenues and gross margin.
We may suffer losses as a result of orders placed with fraudulent credit card data even though the
associated financial institution approved payment of the orders. Under current credit card
practices, we may be liable for fraudulent credit card transactions because we did not obtain a
cardholders signature. If we are unable to detect or control credit card fraud, or if credit card
companies require more burdensome terms, refuse to accept credit card charges or assess financial
penalties, our business could be materially adversely affected.
30
If we are unable to provide satisfactory customer service, we could lose customers.
Our ability to provide satisfactory levels of customer service depends, to a large degree, on
the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our customer service operations. Any material
disruption or slowdown in our order processing systems resulting from labor disputes, telephone or
Internet failures, power or service outages, natural disasters or other events could make it
difficult or impossible to provide adequate customer service and support. If we are unable to
continually provide adequate staffing and training for our customer service operations, our
reputation could be seriously harmed and we could lose customers. Because our success depends in
large part on keeping our customers satisfied, any failure to provide high levels of customer
service would likely impair our reputation and decrease our revenues.
We may not be able to compete successfully against existing or future competitors.
The market for online sales of the products we offer is intensely competitive and rapidly
evolving. We principally compete with a variety of online retailers, specialty retailers and other
businesses that offer products similar to or the same as our products. Increased competition is
likely to result in price reductions, reduced revenue and gross margins and loss of market share.
We expect competition to intensify in the future because current and new competitors can enter the
market with little difficulty and can launch new websites at a relatively low cost. In addition,
some of our product vendors have sold, and continue to intensify their efforts to sell, their
products directly to customers. We currently or potentially compete with a variety of businesses,
including:
|
|
|
other multi-category online retailers and liquidation e-tailers; |
|
|
|
|
online discount retailers of computer and consumer electronics merchandise such as
Buy.com, NewEgg and TigerDirect; |
|
|
|
|
consumer electronics and office supply superstores such as Best Buy, Office Depot,
OfficeMax and Staples; and |
|
|
|
|
manufacturers such as Apple, Dell, Gateway, Hewlett-Packard and IBM, that sell directly
to customers. |
Many of the current and potential competitors described above have longer operating histories,
larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and
other resources than we do. In addition, online retailers may be acquired by, receive investments
from or enter into other commercial relationships with larger, well-established and well-financed
companies. Some of our competitors may be able to secure products from manufacturers or vendors on
more favorable terms, devote greater resources to marketing and promotional campaigns, adopt more
aggressive pricing or inventory availability policies and devote substantially more resources to
website and systems development than we are able to.
If the protection of our trademarks and proprietary rights is inadequate, our eCOST brand and
reputation could be impaired and we could lose customers.
We have five trademarks and/or service marks that we consider to be material to the successful
operation of our business: eCOST ® , eCOST.com ® , eCOST.com Your Online Discount Superstore! ® , Bargain
Countdown ® and Bargain Countdown Platinum Club ® . We currently use these marks in connection with
telephone, mail order, catalog and online retail services. We rely on trademark and copyright law,
trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, suppliers
and others to protect our proprietary rights. Our competitors or others could adopt trademarks
and/or service marks similar to our marks, or try to prevent us from using our marks, and/or
contest our registrations in and to our marks thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity
and possibly leading to customer confusion. Any claim by another party against us for customer
confusion caused by use of our trademarks and/or service marks, or our failure to obtain
registrations for our marks, could negatively affect our competitive position and could cause us to
lose customers.
Although we have received a patent from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for our
proprietary Bargain Countdown ® technology, we cannot provide any assurance that effective patent
and trademark protection will be available in all instances, including in other countries in which
our products and services may be available.
31
Effective trademark, service mark, patent, domain name, copyright and trade secret protection
may not be available in every country in which we will sell our products and offer our services. In
addition, the relationship between regulations governing domain names and laws protecting
trademarks, service marks and similar proprietary rights is unclear. Therefore, we may be unable to
prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe upon or otherwise
decrease the value of our trademarks and/or service marks and other proprietary rights. If we are
unable to protect or preserve the value of our trademarks, service marks, domain names, copyrights,
trade secrets or other proprietary rights for any reason, our competitive position could be
negatively affected and we could lose customers.
We may be subject to product liability claims that could be costly and time consuming.
We sell products manufactured and distributed by third parties, some of which may be defective
or may not comply with applicable laws or regulations, such as laws or regulations requiring
warning labels. If any product that we sell were to cause physical injury or damage to property or
otherwise not comply with applicable laws or regulations, we may be subject to claims being
asserted against us as the retailer of the product. Our insurance coverage may not be available or
adequate to cover every claim that could be asserted. If a successful claim were brought against us
in excess of its insurance coverage, it could expose us to significant liability. Even unsuccessful
claims could result in the expenditure of funds and management time and could decrease
profitability.
eCOST may be subject to future impairment charges related to eCOSTs intangible assets.
The valuation of intangible assets related to eCOST is dependent upon, among other things, the
estimated value of eCOSTs projected cash flows for its business. In the event eCOST is unable to
meet such projections, or such estimated values are otherwise less than the carrying value of such
intangibles, we may be required under current accounting rules to record an impairment charge in
connection with the write-down of such intangibles.
Risks Related to Our eCOST Online Retailer Operating Segments Industry
Additional sales and use taxes could be imposed on past or future sales of our products or other
products sold on our eCOST website, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
In accordance with current industry practice and our interpretation of applicable law, we
collect and remit sales taxes only with respect to physical shipments of goods into states where we
have a physical presence. If any state or other jurisdiction successfully challenges this practice
and imposes sales taxes on orders on which we do not collect and remit sales taxes, we could be
exposed to substantial tax liabilities for past sales and could suffer decreased sales in that
state or jurisdiction in the future. In addition, a number of states, as well as the U.S. Congress,
have been considering various legislative initiatives that could result in the imposition of
additional sales and use taxes on Internet sales. If any of these initiatives are enacted, we could
be required to collect sales taxes in states where we do not have a physical presence. Future
changes in the operation of our business also could result in the imposition of additional sales
tax obligations. The imposition of additional sales and use taxes on past or future sales could
adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
Existing or future government regulation could expose us to liabilities and costly changes in our
business operations, and could reduce customer demand for our products.
We are subject to general business regulations and laws, as well as regulations and laws
specifically governing the Internet and e-commerce. Such existing and future laws and regulations
may impede the growth of the Internet or other online services. These regulations and laws may
cover taxation, user privacy, marketing and promotional practices, database protection, pricing,
content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts, email and other communications, consumer
protection, product safety, the provision of online payment services, intellectual property rights,
unauthorized access (including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act), and the characteristics and
quality of products and services. It is unclear how existing laws governing issues such as property
ownership, sales and other taxes, libel, trespass, data mining and collection, and personal privacy
apply to the Internet and e-commerce. Unfavorable resolution of these issues may expose us to
liabilities and costly changes in our business operations, and could reduce customer demand. The
growth and demand for online commerce has and may continue to result in more stringent consumer
protection laws that impose additional compliance burdens on online
32
companies. For example, the laws of many states require notice to customers if certain
personal information about them is obtained by an unauthorized person, such as a computer hacker.
These consumer protection laws could result in substantial compliance costs and could decrease
profitability.
Risks Related to Our Stock
The market price of our common stock may be volatile. You may not be able to sell your shares at or
above the price at which you purchased such shares.
The trading price of our common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to
quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in operating results, announcements of material adverse events,
general conditions in our industry or the public marketplace and other events or factors. In
addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price and trading volume volatility in recent
years. This volatility has had a substantial effect on the market prices of securities of many
technology related companies for reasons frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the
specific companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock. In addition, if our operating results differ from our announced guidance or the
expectations of equity research analysts or investors, the price of our common stock could decrease
significantly.
Our stock price could decline if a significant number of shares become available for sale.
As of December 31, 2009, we have an aggregate of 1.8 million stock options outstanding to
employees, directors and others with a weighted average exercise price of $4.75 per share. The
shares of common stock that may be issued upon exercise of these options may be resold into the
public market. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the public market as a result of the
exercise of these options, or the perception that future sales of these shares could occur, could
reduce the market price of our common stock and make it more difficult to sell equity securities in
the future.
Our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, our shareholder rights plan and Delaware law make it
difficult for a third party to acquire us, despite the possible benefit to our shareholders.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, our shareholder rights plan and
Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so would
be beneficial to our shareholders. For example, our certificate of incorporation provides for a
classified board of directors, meaning that only approximately one-third of our directors may be
subject to re-election at each annual shareholder meeting. Our certificate of incorporation also
permits our Board of Directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock, which may have
rights and preferences superior to those of the common stock. The ability to issue preferred stock
could have the effect of delaying or preventing a third party from acquiring us. We have also
adopted a shareholder rights plan. These provisions could discourage takeover attempts and could
materially adversely affect the price of our stock. In addition, because we are incorporated in
Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
which may prohibit large shareholders from consummating a merger with, or acquisition of us. These
provisions may prevent a merger or acquisition that would be attractive to shareholders and could
limit the price that investors would be willing to pay in the future for our common stock.
There are limitations on the liabilities of our directors and executive officers.
Pursuant to our bylaws and under Delaware law, our directors are not liable to us or our
shareholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, except for liability for breach of
a directors duty of loyalty, acts or omissions by a director not in good faith or which involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction in which a director has
derived an improper personal benefit.
33
Item 2. Properties
Our general corporate headquarters and the corporate headquarters of our PFS service fee and
Supplies Distributors businesses are located in Plano, Texas, a Dallas suburb. Our eCOST corporate
headquarters is located in El Segundo, California.
In the U.S., we operate two distribution facilities in Memphis, Tennessee, with aggregate
space of approximately 600,000 square feet. We also operate approximately 825,000
square feet of distribution facilities in Southaven, Mississippi. Both of these complexes are
located approximately five miles from the Memphis International Airport. We also manage a
distribution facility in Grapevine, Texas with
approximately 200,000 square feet.
We
operate a distribution center in Liege, Belgium with approximately
150,000 square feet, which contains
advanced distribution systems and equipment. We operate a distribution center in
Toronto, Canada with approximately 23,000 square feet. We also
operate a facility in the Philippines with approximately 7,000 square feet
to provide call
center and customer service functions. We operate customer service centers in our facilities in
Tennessee, Texas, Belgium and the Philippines. Our call center technology permits the automatic
routing of calls to available customer service representatives in several of our call centers.
Except for the Grapevine, Texas facility, which we manage on our clients behalf, all of our
facilities are leased and the material lease agreements contain one or more renewal options.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are not party to any legal proceedings other than routine claims and lawsuits arising in
the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe such claims and lawsuits, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business.
Item 4. Reserved
34
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed and currently trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol
PFSW. The following table sets forth for the period indicated the high and low sale price for
the common stock as reported by NASDAQ:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
6.02 |
|
|
$ |
3.62 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
5.56 |
|
|
$ |
3.50 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
4.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
As of March 3, 2010, there were approximately 5,400 shareholders of which approximately 107
were record holders of the common stock.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate the
payment of cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We are also restricted
from paying dividends under our debt agreements, without the prior approval of our lenders. We
currently intend to retain all earnings to finance the further development of our business. The
payment of any future cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will
depend upon, among other things, future earnings, operations, capital requirements, the general
financial condition of the Company and general business conditions and the approval of our lenders.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
None
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We believe the following discussion and analysis provides information that is relevant to an
assessment and understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This Managements Discussion and
Analysis will help you understand:
|
|
|
The impact of forward looking statements; |
|
|
|
|
Our financial structure, including our historical financial presentation; |
|
|
|
|
Our results of operations for the last three years; |
|
|
|
|
Our relationship with our subsidiaries Supplies Distributors and eCOST; |
|
|
|
|
Our liquidity and capital resources; |
|
|
|
|
The impact of seasonality, inflation and recently issued accounting standards
on our financial statements; and |
|
|
|
|
Our critical accounting policies and estimates. |
Forward-Looking Information
We have made forward-looking statements in this Report on Form 10-K. These statements are
subject to risks and uncertainties, and there can be no guarantee that these statements will prove
to be correct. Forward-looking
35
statements include assumptions as to how we may perform in the future. When we use words like
seek, strive, believe, expect, anticipate, predict, potential, continue, will,
may, could, intend, plan, target and estimate or similar expressions, we are making
forward-looking statements. You should understand that the following important factors, in addition
to the Risk Factors set forth above or elsewhere in this Report on Form 10-K, could cause our
results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. These factors
include:
|
|
|
our ability to retain and expand relationships with existing clients and attract and
implement new clients; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on the fees generated by the transaction volume or product sales of our
clients; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on our clients projections or transaction volume or product sales; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence upon our agreements with International Business Machines Corporation
(IBM) and InfoPrint Solutions Company (IPS), a joint venture company owned by Ricoh and
IBM; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence upon our agreements with our major clients; |
|
|
|
|
our client mix, their business volumes and the seasonality of their business; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to finalize pending contracts; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of strategic alliances and acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
trends in e-commerce, outsourcing, government regulation both foreign and domestic and
the market for our services; |
|
|
|
|
whether we can continue and manage growth; |
|
|
|
|
increased competition; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate more revenue and achieve sustainable profitability; |
|
|
|
|
effects of changes in profit margins; |
|
|
|
|
the customer and supplier concentration of our business; |
|
|
|
|
the reliance on third-party subcontracted services; |
|
|
|
|
the unknown effects of possible system failures and rapid changes in technology; |
|
|
|
|
foreign currency risks and other risks of operating in foreign countries; |
|
|
|
|
potential litigation; |
|
|
|
|
our dependency on key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of new accounting standards, and changes in existing accounting rules or the
interpretations of those rules; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to raise additional capital or obtain additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to borrow under current financing
arrangements and maintain compliance with debt covenants; |
|
|
|
|
relationship with and our guarantees of certain of the liabilities and indebtedness of
our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
taxation on the sale of our products; |
|
|
|
|
eCOSTs ability to maintain existing and build new relationships with manufacturers and
vendors and the success of its advertising and marketing efforts; |
|
|
|
|
eCOSTs ability to increase its sales revenue and sales margin and improve operating
efficiencies; and |
|
|
|
|
eCOSTs ability to generate projected cash flows sufficient to cover the values of its
intangible assets. |
We have based these statements on our current expectations about future events. Although we
believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee these expectations will actually be achieved. In addition, some forward-looking
statements are based upon assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate.
Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expected or forecasted in
such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking
statement for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the
future. There may be additional risks we do not currently view as material or that are not
presently known. In evaluating these statements, you should consider various factors, including the
risks set forth in the section entitled Risk Factors.
Overview
We are an international business process outsourcing provider of end-to-end eCommerce
solutions. We provide these solutions to major brand name companies seeking to optimize their
supply chain and to enhance their traditional and online business channels and initiatives. Through
our eCOST.com® business unit, we are also a leading multi-category online discount retailer of new,
close-out and recertified brand-name merchandise. We
36
derive our revenues from three business segments: 1) eCommerce and business process
outsourcing, 2) master distribution and 3) online discount retailing.
First, in our eCommerce and business process outsourcing business segment, we derive our
revenues from a broad range of services, including professional consulting, technology
collaboration, order management, managed web hosting and web development, the deployment of an
eCommerce technology platform, customer relationship management, financial services including
billing and collection services and working capital solutions, kitting and assembly services,
information management and international fulfillment and distribution services. We offer our
services as an integrated solution, which enables our clients to outsource their complete
infrastructure needs to a single source and to focus on their core competencies. Our distribution
services are conducted at warehouses we lease or manage and include real-time inventory management
and customized picking, packing and shipping of our clients customer orders. We currently provide
infrastructure and distribution solutions to clients that operate in a range of vertical markets,
including technology manufacturing, computer products, cosmetics, fragile goods, contemporary home
furnishings, apparel, aviation, telecommunications and consumer electronics, among others.
In this eCommerce and business process outsourcing segment, we do not own the underlying
inventory or the resulting accounts receivable, but provide management services for these
client-owned assets. We typically charge our service fee revenue on a cost-plus basis, a percent
of shipped revenue basis or a per-transaction basis, such as a per-minute basis for web-enabled
customer contact center services and a per-item basis for fulfillment services. Additional fees are
billed for other services. We price our services based on a variety of factors, including the depth
and complexity of the services provided, the amount of capital expenditures or systems
customization required, the length of contract and other factors.
Many of our service fee contracts involve third-party vendors who provide additional services
such as package delivery. The costs we are charged by these third-party vendors for these services
are often passed on to our clients. Our billings for reimbursements of these costs and other
out-of-pocket expenses include travel, shipping and handling costs and telecommunication charges
and are included in pass-through revenue.
Our second business segment is a product revenue model. In this segment, we are a master
distributor of product for IPS and certain other clients. In this capacity, we purchase, and thus
own, inventory and recognize the corresponding product revenue. As a result, upon the sale of
inventory, we own the accounts receivable. Freight costs billed to customers are reflected as
components of product revenue. This business segment requires significant working capital
requirements, for which we have senior credit facilities to provide for approximately $91 million
of available financing.
Our third business segment is a web-commerce product revenue model focused on the sale of
products to a broad range of consumer and business customers. In this segment we operate as a
multi-category online discount retailer of new, close-out and recertified brand-name merchandise.
Our product line currently offers approximately 300,000 products in several primary merchandise
categories, primarily including computers, networking, electronics and entertainment, TVs,
monitors and projectors, cameras and camcorders, memory and storage, For the Home and sports and
leisure.
Growth is a key element to achieving our future goals, including achieving and maintaining
sustainable profitability. Growth in our eCommerce and business process outsourcing segment is
driven by two main elements: new client relationships and organic growth from existing clients. We
focus our sales efforts on larger contracts with brand-name companies within two primary target
markets, online brands and retailers and technology manufacturers, which, by nature, require a
longer duration to close but also have the potential to be higher quality and longer duration
engagements.
Growth within our product revenue business is primarily driven by our ability to attract new
master distributor arrangements with IPS or other manufacturers and the sales and marketing efforts
of the manufacturers and third party sales partners.
Growth within our web-commerce product revenue model is primarily driven by eCOSTs ability to
increase sales by generating organic growth, new customers and expanding its product line.
37
We continue to monitor and control our costs to focus on profitability. While we are targeting
our new service fee contracts to yield increased gross profit, we also expect to incur incremental
investments to implement new contracts, investments in infrastructure and sales and marketing to
support our targeted growth and increased public company professional fees.
Our expenses comprise primarily four categories: 1) cost of product revenue, 2) cost of
service fee revenue, 3) cost of pass-through revenue and 4) operating expenses.
Cost
of product revenue consists of the purchase price of product sold and freight costs,
which are reduced by certain reimbursable expenses. These reimbursable expenses include
pass-through customer marketing programs, direct costs incurred in passing on any price decreases
offered by vendors to cover price protection and certain special bids, the cost of products
provided to replace defective product returned by customers and certain other expenses as defined
under the master distributor agreements. Vendor marketing programs, such as co-op advertising,
also reduce cost of product revenue.
Cost of service fee revenue consists primarily of compensation and related expenses for our
web-enabled customer contact center services, international fulfillment and distribution services
and professional consulting services, and other fixed and variable expenses directly related to
providing services under the terms of fee based contracts, including certain occupancy and
information technology costs and depreciation and amortization expenses.
Cost of pass-through revenue the related reimbursable costs for pass-through expenditures
are reflected as cost of pass-through revenue.
Operating expenses consist primarily of selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses such as compensation and related expenses for sales and marketing staff, advertising,
online marketing and catalog production, distribution costs (excluding freight) applicable to the
Supplies Distributors and eCOST businesses, executive, management and administrative personnel and
other overhead costs, including certain occupancy and information technology costs and depreciation
and amortization expenses.
Monitoring and controlling our available cash balances continues to be a primary focus. Our
cash and liquidity positions are important components of our financing of both current operations
and our targeted growth. In recent years we have added to our available cash and liquidity
positions through various transactions, including working capital financing agreements for our
primary operating subsidiaries and through sales of our common stock through private placement
transactions.
38
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
The following table discloses certain financial information for the periods presented,
expressed in terms of dollars, dollar change, percentage change and as a percentage of total
revenue (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue, net |
|
$ |
267.6 |
|
|
$ |
330.5 |
|
|
$ |
(62.9 |
) |
|
|
(19.0 |
)% |
|
|
75.9 |
% |
|
|
73.2 |
% |
Service fee revenue |
|
|
58.6 |
|
|
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
|
|
(31.3 |
)% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
Pass-through revenue |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
)% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
352.5 |
|
|
|
451.8 |
|
|
|
(99.3 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
)% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
245.2 |
|
|
|
305.1 |
|
|
|
(59.9 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
)% |
|
|
91.7 |
%(1) |
|
|
92.3 |
% |
Cost of service fee revenue |
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
(27.8 |
)% |
|
|
71.5 |
%(2) |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
Pass-through cost of revenue |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(26.8 |
)% |
|
|
100.0 |
%(3) |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
313.4 |
|
|
|
399.0 |
|
|
|
(85.6 |
) |
|
|
(21.4 |
)% |
|
|
88.9 |
% |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue gross profit |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
)% |
|
|
8.3 |
%(1) |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
Service fee gross profit |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(38.9 |
)% |
|
|
28.5 |
%(2) |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
Pass-through gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
(26.0 |
)% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
(4) |
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
|
|
(36.3 |
)% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
(77.1 |
)% |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
)% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
(71.4 |
)% |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(59.1 |
)% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(15.7 |
) |
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
|
(70.8 |
)% |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the percent of Product revenue, net. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the percent of Service fee revenue. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the percent of Pass-through revenue. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes a $16.3 million charge for goodwill and intangible asset impairment. |
Product Revenue, net. eCOST product revenue was $84.6 million in 2009, a 15.3% decrease
as compared to $99.8 million in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to an overall
decline in sales in both its business to business (B2B) channel and business to consumer (B2C)
channel during the 2009 period primarily resulting from the impact of the global economic
environment.
Supplies Distributors product revenue of $183.0 million decreased $47.7 million, or 20.7% in
2009 as compared to the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to decreased sales volume
resulting from the impact of overall global economic pressures, inventory rationalization by
customers, reduced IBM and IPS printer installations in certain categories as well as the negative
impact of foreign exchange rates compared to the same period in the prior year.
We currently expect our total 2010 annual product revenue to remain relatively stable or
increase moderately from 2009 levels as global economic conditions improve.
39
Service Fee Revenue. The decrease in service fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009
was primarily due to the non-renewal of a certain U.S. government agency client relationship, which
ended in early 2009, partially offset by increased service fees generated from the impact of new
service contract relationships. The change in service fee revenue, excluding pass-through revenue,
is shown below ($ millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
85.4 |
|
New service contract relationships, including certain
incremental projects under new contracts |
|
|
8.3 |
|
Change in existing client service fees |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
Terminated clients not included in 2009 revenue |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
58.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
The $28.0 million reduction of service fee revenue that resulted from the non-renewal of the
U.S. government agency client is included in the change in existing client service fees line item
above as there was activity with this client in each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The service fee revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009
includes approximately $8 million of revenue with clients that terminated during 2009, including the U.S. government agency contract. However,
based on historical activity and current projection of existing clients, including new clients
signed in 2008 and 2009, net of the impact from the non-renewal of certain clients, we currently
anticipate that 2010 service fee revenue will increase from 2009 service fee revenue levels.
Cost of Product Revenue. The gross margin for eCOST was $8.2 million or 9.7% of product
revenue in 2009 and $8.8 million or 8.8% of product revenue during 2008. Gross margin for eCOST
increased from the prior year primarily due to the customer mix, which included a larger percentage
of sales to the higher margin business-to-consumer channel compared to the same period last year.
We are targeting an increasing percentage of eCOST revenues to be generated from the
business-to-consumer channel, yet we continue to strive to improve our product sales and gross
margin in our business-to-business channel.
Supplies Distributors cost of product revenue decreased by $45.2 million, or 21.1%, to $168.9
million in 2009, primarily as a result of decreased product sales. The resulting gross profit
margin was $14.1 million or 7.7% of product revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $16.6
million or 7.2% of product revenue for 2008. The gross profit margin for 2009 and 2008 include
certain incremental inventory cost adjustments. The 2009 margin percentage reflects an increase
due to incremental gross margin earned on product sales resulting from certain product price
increases, which is partially offset by the impact from a customer bankruptcy during the first
quarter of 2009.
Cost of Service Fee Revenue. Gross profit as a percentage of service fees declined to 28.5%
in 2009 from 32.1% in 2008. The 2008 margins include the benefit of a full year of higher margin
incremental project work associated with the U.S. government contract relationship that was not
renewed and was completed in the second quarter of 2009.
We target to earn an overall gross profit of 25-30% on existing and new service fee contracts,
but we have and may continue to accept lower gross margin percentages on certain contracts
depending on contract scope and other factors.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses decreased by $24.0 million compared to 2008.
Operating expenses were $42.1 million, or 11.9% of total net revenues in the 2009 period and $66.1
million, or 14.6% of total net revenues in the prior year. Operating expenses in 2008 include a
goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge of $16.3 million resulting from our annual analysis
required under accounting standards. Excluding the impact of the $16.3 million impairment charge
for goodwill and intangible assets, operating expenses were 11.0% of total net revenues in the 2008
period. The remaining increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues is due to the
reduction in total net revenues, which decreased at a higher rate than the reduction in operating
expenses. During 2009, we implemented certain cost reductions, primarily personnel related
adjustments, as a result of the lower service fee revenue and product revenue.
40
Income Taxes. We recorded a tax provision associated primarily with state income taxes and our
subsidiary Supplies Distributors Canadian and European operations. During 2009, we recognized a
tax benefit relating to our adoption of a new transfer pricing policy between certain international
subsidiaries. This policy adoption resulted from the completion of a transfer pricing study and
its approval by appropriate tax regulators. A valuation allowance has been provided for the
majority of our net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, which are
primarily related to our net operating loss carryforwards and certain foreign deferred tax assets.
We expect that we will continue to record an income tax provision associated with state income
taxes and Supplies Distributors Canadian and European results of operations.
Supplies Distributors and its Subsidiaries
Supplies Distributors and its subsidiaries act as master distributors of various IPS and other
products and, pursuant to a transaction management services agreement between us and Supplies
Distributors, we provide transaction management and fulfillment services to Supplies Distributors
and its subsidiaries. In addition to our equity investment in Supplies Distributors, we have also
provided Supplies Distributors with a subordinated loan that, as of December 31, 2009, had an
outstanding balance of $5.0 million.
Supplies Distributors has paid us dividends of $2.1 million and $3.0 million in 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Supplies Distributors has received lender approval to pay dividends of approximately
$3.0 million in 2010, and to reduce its subordinated debt to us by $0.8 million, but pursuant to
the terms of its amended credit agreements, is restricted from paying further cash dividends
without the prior approval of its lenders. In addition, no distribution may be made if, after
giving effect thereto, Supplies Distributors or its subsidiaries be in noncompliance with its
financial covenants under its current facilities.
eCOST and its Subsidiaries
eCOST is a multi-category online discount retailer of new, close-out and recertified
brand-name merchandise, selling products primarily to customers in the United States. As of
December 31, 2009, we have advanced $15.8 million to eCOST to support its operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities was $8.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2009 and primarily resulted from a decrease in inventories of $8.8 million, a decrease in accounts
receivable of $5.0 million and cash income before working capital changes of $3.8 million partially
offset by a decrease in accounts payable, deferred revenue, accrued expenses and other liabilities
of $9.5 million. These changes primarily resulted from decreased working capital requirements in
our Supplies Distributors segment related to decreased product revenues compared to 2008.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $9.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2008 and primarily resulted from cash income before working capital changes of $9.1 million, an
increase in accounts payable, deferred revenue, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $5.3
million, a decrease in accounts receivable of $3.0 million and a decrease in restricted cash of
$0.3 million, partially offset by an increase in prepaid expenses, other receivables and other
assets of $5.0 million and an increase in inventories of $3.2 million.
Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 totaled
$4.4 million and $5.6 million, respectively, primarily resulting from capital expenditures.
Capital expenditures have historically consisted primarily of additions to upgrade our
management information systems and general expansion of our facilities, both domestic and foreign, and certain technology and development costs related to new client implementations.
We expect to incur capital expenditures to support new contracts and anticipated future growth
opportunities. Based on our current client business activity and our targeted growth plans, we
anticipate our total investment in upgrades and additions to facilities and information technology
services and capitalized implementation costs for the upcoming twelve months will be approximately $4 million to $7 million, although
additional capital expenditures may be necessary to support the infrastructure requirements of new
clients. To maintain our current operating cash position, a portion of these expenditures may be
financed through debt, operating or capital leases, additional equity or implementation fees charged to our clients. We may elect to modify or
defer a portion of such anticipated
investments in the event that we do not achieve the revenue necessary to support such
investments.
41
Net cash used in financing activities was approximately $5.4 million and $2.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, primarily representing payments on debt and
capital leases.
Our liquidity has been negatively impacted as a result of the merger with eCOST. Since the
merger in February 2006, eCOST has experienced a net use of cash primarily due to operating losses.
As a result, we have had to support eCOSTs cash needs with the goal of reducing operating losses.
The amount of further cash needed to support eCOST operations will depend upon the financing
available as well as eCOSTs ability to improve its financial results. eCOSTs results, excluding
the impact of any non-cash impairment charges, have improved in recent years, and we expect
continued improvement as a result of efforts to increase sales, improve product mix and further
improve operational efficiencies.
Our liquidity has also been negatively impacted by a decline in service fee revenue due to the
current general economic decline as well as the nonrenewal of a U.S. government agency contract and
certain other contracts. To help minimize the impact of lower service fee revenue, we have
implemented certain measures that reduced variable costs and expenses and redeployed existing
infrastructure to other client activities. No assurance can be given that a further decline in
service fee revenue will not have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition
or results of operations.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, our working capital decreased to $19.3 million from
$21.4 million at December 31, 2008, partially due to the paydown of debt facilities along with capital
expenditures that were not financed through financing arrangements or client implementation fees.
Working capital as of December 31, 2009 included the benefit from certain clients paying implementation fees in 2009 applicable to technology and development costs that will be incurred by us during 2010. To obtain
additional financing in the future, in addition to our current cash position, we plan to evaluate
various financing alternatives including the sale of equity, utilizing capital or operating leases,
borrowing under our credit facilities, expanding our current credit facilities, entering into new
debt agreements or transferring to third-parties a portion of our subordinated loan balance due
from Supplies Distributors. In conjunction with certain of these alternatives, we may be required
to provide certain letters of credit to secure these arrangements. No assurances can be given we
will be successful in obtaining any additional financing or the terms thereof. We currently believe
our cash position, financing available under our credit facilities and funds generated from
operations (including cost reductions related to the nonrenewal of our U.S. government contract)
will satisfy our presently known operating cash needs, our working capital and capital expenditure
requirements, our current debt and lease obligations, and additional loans to our subsidiaries
Supplies Distributors and eCOST, if necessary, for at least the next twelve months.
During the past two years, the credit markets and the financial services industry have been
experiencing a period of unprecedented turmoil and upheaval characterized by the bankruptcy,
failure, collapse or sale of various financial institutions and an unprecedented level of
intervention from the United States and foreign governments. While the ultimate outcome of these
events cannot be predicted, they may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial
condition, results of operations and our ability to renew our credit facilities.
In support of certain debt instruments and leases, as of December 31, 2009, we had $2.1
million of cash restricted for repayment to lenders. In addition, as described above, we have
provided collateralized guarantees to secure the repayment of certain of our subsidiaries credit
facilities. Many of these facilities include both financial and non-financial covenants, and also
include cross default provisions applicable to other credit facilities and agreements. These
covenants include minimum levels of net worth for the individual borrower subsidiaries and the
parent guarantor and restrictions on the ability of the borrower subsidiaries to advance funds to
other borrower subsidiaries. As a result, it is possible for one or more of these borrower
subsidiaries to fail to meet their respective covenants even if another borrower subsidiary
otherwise has available excess funds which, if not restricted, could be used to cure the default.
To the extent we fail to comply with our debt covenants, including the monthly financial covenant
requirements and our required level of shareholders equity, and the lenders accelerate the
repayment of the credit facility obligations, we would be required to repay all amounts outstanding
thereunder. In particular, in the event eCOST is unable to increase its revenue and/or gross profit
from its present levels, or if PFS service fee revenue declines from expected levels and it is
unable to reduce costs to correspond to such reduced revenue levels or if Supplies Distributors
revenue or gross profit declines from expected levels, such events may result in a breach of one or
more of the financial covenants required under their working capital lines of credit. In such
event, absent a waiver, the working capital lender would be entitled to accelerate all amounts
outstanding thereunder and exercise all other rights and remedies, including sale of collateral and
payment under our parent guaranty. A requirement to
42
accelerate the repayment of the credit facility obligations would have a material adverse impact on
our financial condition and results of operations. We can provide no assurance we will have the
financial ability to repay all of such obligations. As of December 31, 2009, we were in compliance
with all debt covenants. Further, any non-renewal of any of our credit facilities would have a
material adverse impact on our business and financial condition. We do not have any other material
financial commitments, although future client contracts may require capital expenditures and lease
commitments to support the services provided to such clients.
In the future, we may attempt to acquire other businesses or seek an equity or strategic
partner to generate capital or expand our services or capabilities in connection with our efforts
to grow our business. Acquisitions involve certain risks and uncertainties and may require
additional financing. Therefore, we can give no assurance with respect to whether we will be
successful in identifying businesses to acquire or an equity or strategic partner, whether we or
they will be able to obtain financing to complete a transaction, or whether we or they will be
successful in operating the acquired business.
To finance their distribution of IPS products, Supplies Distributors and its subsidiaries have
short-term credit facilities with IBM Credit LLC (IBM Credit) and IBM Belgium Financial Services
S.A. (IBM Belgium). We have provided a collateralized guaranty to secure the repayment of these
credit facilities. These asset-based credit facilities provided financing for up to $30.5 million
and up to 16 million Euros (approximately $23.0 million at December 31, 2009) with IBM Credit and
IBM Belgium, respectively. These agreements expire in April 2011.
Supplies Distributors also has a loan and security agreement with Wachovia Bank, N.A.
(Wachovia) to provide financing for up to $25 million of eligible accounts receivables in the
United States and Canada. The Wachovia facility expires on the earlier of March 2011 or the date on
which the parties to the IPS master distributor agreement no longer operate under the terms of such
agreement and/or IPS no longer supplies products pursuant to such agreement.
Supplies Distributors European subsidiary has a factoring agreement with Fortis Commercial
Finance N.V. (Fortis) to provide factoring for up to 7.5 million Euros (approximately $10.8
million at December 31, 2009) of eligible accounts receivables through March 2011.
These credit facilities contain cross default provisions, various restrictions upon the
ability of Supplies Distributors and its subsidiaries to, among other things, merge, consolidate,
sell assets, incur indebtedness, make loans, investments and payments to related parties (including
entities directly or indirectly owned by PFSweb, Inc.), provide guarantees, make investments and
loans, pledge assets, make changes to capital stock ownership structure and pay dividends, as well
as financial covenants, such as cash flow from operations, annualized revenue to working capital,
net profit after tax to revenue, minimum net worth and total liabilities to tangible net worth, as
defined, and are secured by all of the assets of Supplies Distributors, as well as a collateralized
guaranty of PFSweb. Additionally, we are required to maintain a subordinated loan to Supplies
Distributors of no less than $4.3 million, not maintain restricted cash of more than $5.0 million,
are restricted with regard to transactions with related parties, indebtedness and changes to
capital stock ownership structure and a minimum shareholders equity of at least $18.0 million.
Furthermore, we are obligated to repay any over-advance made to Supplies Distributors or its
subsidiaries under these facilities if they are unable to do so. We have also provided a guarantee
of the obligations of Supplies Distributors and its subsidiaries to IBM and IPS, excluding the
trade payables that are financed by IBM credit.
Our PFS subsidiary has entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (Agreement) with Comerica
Bank (Comerica), which provides for up to $10.0 million of eligible accounts receivable financing
through March 2011. We entered this Agreement to supplement our existing cash position, and provide
funding for our current and future operations, including our targeted growth. The Agreement
contains cross default provisions, various restrictions upon our ability to, among other things,
merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur indebtedness, make loans and payments to subsidiaries,
affiliates and related parties (including entities directly or indirectly owned by PFSweb, Inc.),
make capital expenditures, make investments and loans, pledge assets, make changes to capital stock
ownership structure, as well as financial covenants of a minimum tangible net worth of $20.0
million, as defined, a minimum earnings before interest and taxes, plus depreciation, amortization
and non-cash compensation accruals, if any, as defined, and a minimum liquidity ratio, as defined.
The Agreement also limits PFS ability to increase the subordinated loan to Supplies Distributors
to more than $5.5 million and permits PFS to advance incremental amounts subject to certain cash
inflows to PFS, as defined, to certain of its subsidiaries and/or affiliates, including
eCOST. The Agreement is secured by all of the assets of PFS, as well as a guarantee of PFSweb.
43
eCOST currently has an asset-based line of credit facility of up to $7.5 million with
Wachovia, which is collateralized by substantially all of eCOSTs assets and expires in May 2011.
Borrowings under the facility are limited to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and
letter of credit availability is limited to a percentage of accounts receivable and inventory. As
of December 31, 2009, eCOST had $1.0 million of letters of credit outstanding and $1.2 million of
available credit under this facility. The credit facility restricts eCOSTs ability to, among other
things, merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur indebtedness, make loans, investments and payments
to subsidiaries, affiliates and related parties, make investments and loans, pledge assets, make
changes to capital stock ownership structure, as well as a minimum tangible net worth of $0, as
defined. PFSweb has guaranteed all current and future obligations of eCOST under this line of
credit.
We financed certain capital expenditures through a Loan Agreement with the Mississippi
Business Finance Corporation (the MBFC) pursuant to which the MBFC issued MBFC Taxable Variable
Rate Demand Limited Obligation Revenue Bonds, Series 2004 (Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc.
Project) (the Bonds). The MBFC loaned us the proceeds of the Bonds for the purpose of financing
the acquisition and installation of equipment, machinery and related assets to support incremental
business from a Southaven, Mississippi distribution facility. The primary source of repayment of
the Bonds is a letter of credit (the Letter of Credit) issued by Comerica pursuant to a
Reimbursement Agreement between us and Comerica under which we are obligated to pay to Comerica all
amounts drawn under the Letter of Credit. The Letter of Credit has a maturity date of April 2011
at which time, if not renewed or replaced, will result in a draw on the undrawn face amount
thereof. The amount outstanding on the Loan Agreement as of December 31, 2009 was $2.4 million.
Our obligations under the Reimbursement Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of
our PFS subsidiary, including restricted cash of $0.7 million and a parent company guarantee.
eCOST has historically incurred significant operating losses and used cash to fund its
operations. As a result, we have been required to invest cash to fund eCOSTs operations, which we
may not be able to continue to do without approval from our lenders. The amount of further cash
needed to support eCOST operations depends upon the financing available under its credit line as
well as eCOSTs ability to improve its financial results. Through March 31, 2010, we have advanced
$15.8 million to eCOST to fund eCOSTs cash flow requirements and have lender approval to advance
incremental amounts subject to certain cash inflows to PFS, as defined, to certain of our
subsidiaries and/or affiliates, including eCOST. In the event we need to advance further cash to
eCOST, we may be required to seek approval from our lenders to provide such funds. We can provide
no assurance that we will receive such approval from our lenders or any terms or conditions
required by our lenders in order to obtain such approval. In addition, PFSweb has provided a
guaranty of eCOSTs bank line of credit and certain eCOST vendor trade payables.
We receive municipal tax abatements in certain locations. During 2004 we received notice from
a municipality that we did not satisfy certain criteria necessary to maintain the abatements. In
December 2006 we received notice that the municipal authority planned to make an adjustment to our
tax abatement. We have disputed the adjustment as of December 31, 2009, but if the dispute is not resolved favorably,
additional property taxes of approximately $1.7 million could be assessed against us.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is
material to investors.
Inventory Management
We manage our inventories held for sale by maintaining sufficient quantities of product to
achieve high order fill rates while at the same time maximizing inventory turnover rates. Inventory
balances will fluctuate as we add new product lines. To reduce the risk of loss due to supplier
price reductions, our master distributor agreement, as well as certain vendor agreements in our
eCOST business, provide for price protection under which we receive credits if the supplier lowers
prices on previously purchased inventory.
44
Seasonality
The seasonality of our service fee business is dependent upon the seasonality of our clients
business and sales of their products. Accordingly, our management must rely upon the projections of
our clients in assessing quarterly variability. We believe that with our current client mix and
their current business volumes, our run rate service fee business activity will be at its lowest in
the quarter ended March 31. We anticipate our Supplies Distributors product revenue will be
highest during the quarter ended December 31. Our eCOST business is moderately seasonal, reflecting
the general pattern of peak sales for the retail industry during the holiday shopping season.
Typically, a larger portion of our eCOST revenues occur during the fourth fiscal quarter. We
believe our historical revenue pattern makes it difficult to predict the effect of seasonality on
our future revenues and results of operations.
We believe that results of operations for a quarterly period may not be indicative of the
results for any other quarter or for the full year.
Inflation
Management believes inflation has not had a material effect on our operations.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13,
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force to
amend certain guidance in FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC) 605, Revenue
Recognition, 25, Multiple-Element Arrangements. The amended guidance in ASC 605-25 (1) modifies
the separation criteria by eliminating the criterion that requires objective and reliable evidence
of fair value for the undelivered item(s), and (2) eliminates the use of the residual method of
allocation and instead requires that arrangement consideration be allocated, at the inception of
the arrangement, to all deliverables based on their relative selling price.
The FASB also issued ASU 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements
a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, to amend the scope of arrangements under ASC
985, Software, 605, Revenue Recognition to exclude tangible products containing software
components and non-software components that function together to deliver a products essential
functionality.
The amended guidance in ASC 605-25 and ASC 985-605 is effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010, with early application and retrospective application permitted. We are in the process of
evaluating the impact the amendments to ASC 605-25 and ASC 985-605 will have on our consolidated
financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. These accounting principles require us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of our
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
While we do not believe the reported amounts would be materially different, application of these
policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties
and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. If there is a significant
unfavorable change to current conditions, it would likely result in a material adverse impact to
our business, operating results and financial condition. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions
on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies are
disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
We have defined a critical accounting estimate as one that is both important to the portrayal
of our financial condition and results of operations and requires us to make difficult, subjective
or complex judgments or estimates
45
about matters that are uncertain. During the past three fiscal years, we have not made any
material changes in accounting methodology used to establish the critical accounting estimates
discussed below. The following represent certain critical accounting policies that require us to
exercise our business judgment or make significant estimates. In addition, there are other items
within our consolidated financial statements that require estimation but are not deemed critical as
defined above.
Product Revenue Recognition
Sales are recognized when the title and risk of loss are passed to the customer, there is
persuasive evidence of an arrangement for the sale, delivery has occurred and/or services have been
rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Under
these guidelines, we recognize a majority of our sales, including revenue from product sales and
gross outbound shipping and handling charges, upon receipt of the product by the customer. For all
product sales shipped directly from suppliers to customers, we are the primary obligor in the
transaction, and we take title to the products sold upon shipment, bear credit risk, and bear
inventory risk for returned products that are not successfully returned to suppliers; therefore, we
recognize these revenues at gross sales amounts.
Sales are reported net of estimated returns and allowances, credit card fraud and chargebacks,
all of which are estimated based upon historical information such as return and redemption rates,
and fraud and chargeback experience. Management also considers any other current information and
trends in making estimates. If actual sales returns, allowances, discounts and credit card fraud
and chargebacks are greater than estimated by management, additional expense may be incurred.
Cost of Service Fee Revenue
Our service fee revenue primarily relates to our distribution services and order
management/customer care services. Distribution services relate primarily to inventory management,
product receiving, warehousing and fulfillment (i.e., picking, packing and shipping). Order
management/customer care services relate primarily to taking customer orders for our clients
products via various channels such as telephone call-center, electronic or facsimile. These
services also entail addressing customer questions related to orders, as well as
cross-selling/up-selling activities.
Our cost of service fee revenue represents the cost to provide the services described above,
primarily compensation and related expenses and other fixed and variable expenses directly related
to providing the services. These include certain occupancy and information technology costs and
depreciation and amortization expenses. Certain of these costs are allocated from general and
administrative expenses. For these allocations, we estimate the amount of direct expenses based on
a client-specific number of transactions processed. We believe our allocation methodology is
reasonable, however a change in assumptions would result in a different gross profit in our
statement of operations, yet no change to the resulting net income or loss.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The determination of the collectability of amounts due from our customers requires us to use
estimates and make judgments regarding future events and trends, including monitoring our
customers payment history and current credit worthiness to determine that collectability is
reasonably assured, as well as consideration of the overall business climate in which our clients
and customers operate. Inherently, these uncertainties require us to make frequent judgments and
estimates regarding our clients and customers ability to pay amounts due us to determine the
appropriate amount of valuation allowances required for doubtful accounts. Provisions for doubtful
accounts are recorded when it becomes evident that the client or customer will not make the
required payments at either contractual due dates or in the future.
With our master distributor and online discount retail businesses, we also maintain an
allowance for uncollectible vendor receivables, which arise from inventory returns to vendors,
vendor rebate and advertising programs, price protections and other promotions. We determine the
sufficiency of the vendor receivable allowance based upon various factors, including payment
history. Amounts received from vendors may vary from amounts recorded because of potential
non-compliance with certain elements of vendor programs. If our estimated
allowances for uncollectible accounts or vendor receivables subsequently prove insufficient,
additional allowance maybe required.
46
Allowances for doubtful accounts totaled $1.0 million at both December 31, 2009 and 2008. We
believe our allowances for doubtful accounts are adequate to cover anticipated losses under current
conditions; however, uncertainties regarding changes in the financial condition of our clients and
customers, either adverse or positive, could impact the amount and timing of any additional
provisions for doubtful accounts that may be required.
Inventory Reserves
Inventories (merchandise, held for resale, all of which are finished goods) are stated at the
lower of weighted average cost or market. Supplies Distributors and its subsidiaries assume
responsibility for slow-moving inventory under certain master distributor agreements, subject to
certain termination rights, but have the right to return product rendered obsolete by engineering
changes, as defined. eCOST assumes responsibility for slow-moving inventory but has limited rights
to return product based on specific inventory agreements. We review inventories for impairment on
a periodic basis, but at a minimum, annually. Recoverability of the inventory on hand is measured
by comparisons of the carrying value to the fair value of the inventory. This requires us to record
provisions and maintain reserves for excess or obsolete inventory. If write-downs of inventories
are necessary, the cost basis of that inventory is adjusted. To determine these reserve amounts, we
regularly review inventory quantities on hand and compare them to estimates of future product
demand and market conditions. These estimates and forecasts inherently include uncertainties and
require us to make judgments regarding potential outcomes. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, our
allowance for slow moving inventory was $2.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively. We believe our
reserves are adequate to cover anticipated losses under current conditions. Significant or
unanticipated changes to our estimates and forecasts, either adverse or positive, could impact the
amount and timing of any additional provisions for excess or obsolete inventory that may be
required.
Income Taxes
The liability method is used for determining our income taxes, under which current and
deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates.
Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are
determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered.
Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need
for valuation allowances, we have considered and made judgments and estimates regarding estimated
future taxable income. These estimates and judgments include some degree of uncertainty and changes
in these estimates and assumptions could require us to adjust the valuation allowances for our
deferred tax assets. The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends on the generation
of sufficient taxable income in the applicable taxing jurisdictions. Although we believe our
estimates and judgments are reasonable, actual results may differ, which could be material.
As we operate in multiple countries, we are subject to the jurisdiction of multiple domestic
and foreign tax authorities. Determination of taxable income in any jurisdiction requires the
interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and the use of estimates and assumptions
regarding significant future events such as the amount, timing and character of deductions,
permissible revenue recognition methods under the tax law and the sources and character of income
and tax credits. Changes in tax laws, regulations, foreign currency exchange restrictions or our
level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount
of income taxes that we provide during any given year.
Intangible Assets
We make judgments and estimates in conjunction with the carrying value of intangible assets,
including amounts to be capitalized, depreciation and amortization methods and useful lives.
Additionally, we review intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We record
impairment losses in the period in which we determine that the carrying amount is not recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of
an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. This may require us to
make judgments regarding long-term forecasts of our future revenues and costs related to the assets
subject to review. During the
47
fourth quarter of 2008, we determined the carrying values of the intangible assets resulting
from our acquisition of eCOST were impaired, which resulted in a $4.5 million write-off of
intangible assets in 2008. No intangible assets were determined to be impaired during 2009.
Goodwill
The Company acquired eCOST in 2006 because of the strategic benefits expected to result from
combining eCOSTs e-commerce platform with PFSwebs advanced technology and operational
infrastructure thereby providing the combined company with the enhanced ability to expand its
market share in the fast growing web commerce market. Such benefits are the primary factors that
contributed to a purchase price that resulted in the recognition of goodwill.
Goodwill was derived by the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net
identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of eCOST in 2006, and is
included in the eCOST reportable segment. Goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes, is
not being amortized but is subject to an impairment test each year, using a fair-value-based
approach.
We review goodwill for impairment at least annually on December 31. We record impairment
losses in the period in which we determine that the carrying amount is not recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of
an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. We estimate the fair
value of the eCOST reporting unit using a combination of valuation models, including the income
approach method, the guideline company method, and stock price method. These models require us to
make judgments regarding long-term forecasts of our future revenues and costs related to the assets
subject to review, costs of capital and residual values. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we
determined the carrying values of the goodwill resulting from our acquisition of eCOST were
impaired, which resulted in an $11.8 million write-off of goodwill in 2008. As of December 31,
2009, the estimated fair value of the eCOST reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount by
approximately 65%.
48
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
PFSweb, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
Supplementary Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
49
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
PFSweb, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PFSweb, Inc. (a Delaware
corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive
loss, and cash flows for the years then ended. Our audits of the basic financial statements
included the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a) (1).
These financial statements and the financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedules based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of PFSweb, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 31, 2010
50
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
14,812 |
|
|
$ |
16,050 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $973
and $980 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
39,861 |
|
|
|
44,546 |
|
Inventories, net of reserves of $2,016 and $2,124 at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
37,949 |
|
|
|
47,186 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
11,605 |
|
|
|
13,072 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,170 |
|
|
|
3,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
110,493 |
|
|
|
126,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
10,314 |
|
|
|
12,106 |
|
IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLES, net |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
3,602 |
|
|
|
3,602 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
2,555 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
127,769 |
|
|
$ |
144,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
19,179 |
|
|
$ |
22,251 |
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
53,642 |
|
|
|
61,988 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
3,640 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
13,180 |
|
|
|
17,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
91,165 |
|
|
|
105,293 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, less current
portion |
|
|
3,348 |
|
|
|
4,951 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
3,903 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
98,416 |
|
|
|
111,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $1.00 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 35,000,000 shares authorized;
9,952,164 and 9,935,095 shares issued at December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively; and 9,933,803 and 9,916,734
outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
93,152 |
|
|
|
92,728 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(65,963 |
) |
|
|
(61,393 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 18,361 shares |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
29,353 |
|
|
|
33,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
127,769 |
|
|
$ |
144,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
51
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue, net |
|
$ |
267,615 |
|
|
$ |
330,532 |
|
Service fee revenue |
|
|
58,619 |
|
|
|
85,406 |
|
Pass-through revenue |
|
|
26,265 |
|
|
|
35,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
352,499 |
|
|
|
451,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS OF REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
245,272 |
|
|
|
305,090 |
|
Cost of service fee revenue |
|
|
41,898 |
|
|
|
58,009 |
|
Cost of pass-through revenue |
|
|
26,265 |
|
|
|
35,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs of revenues |
|
|
313,435 |
|
|
|
399,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
39,064 |
|
|
|
52,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES, including stock based
compensation expense of $407 and $547
in the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively |
|
|
41,995 |
|
|
|
49,073 |
|
AMORTIZATION OF IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLES |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSET IMPAIRMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
42,100 |
|
|
|
66,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(13,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net |
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(4,241 |
) |
|
|
(14,850 |
) |
INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(4,570 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES
OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted |
|
|
9,929 |
|
|
|
9,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
52
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008 |
|
|
9,909,401 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
92,121 |
|
|
$ |
(45,738 |
) |
|
$ |
2,534 |
|
|
|
18,361 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
48,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,655 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,655 |
) |
Stock-based compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
7,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercised options |
|
|
18,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive lossforeign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(709 |
) |
|
|
(709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(16,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
9,935,095 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
92,728 |
|
|
$ |
(61,393 |
) |
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
|
|
18,361 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
33,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,570 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,570 |
) |
Stock-based compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
17,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive lossforeign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
9,952,164 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
93,152 |
|
|
$ |
(65,963 |
) |
|
$ |
2,239 |
|
|
|
18,361 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
29,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
53
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,570 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,655 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,852 |
|
|
|
6,622 |
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,250 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Provision for excess and obsolete inventory |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
1,482 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
291 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
8,799 |
|
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
Prepaid expenses, other receivables and other assets |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(5,031 |
) |
Accounts payable, deferred revenue, accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(9,486 |
) |
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8,126 |
|
|
|
9,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(4,440 |
) |
|
|
(5,754 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,440 |
) |
|
|
(5,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
Payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(1,680 |
) |
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
Payments on debt, net |
|
|
(3,642 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(5,382 |
) |
|
|
(2,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(1,238 |
) |
|
|
1,778 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
16,050 |
|
|
|
14,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
14,812 |
|
|
$ |
16,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment acquired under capital leases |
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
54
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Overview
PFSweb, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Supplies Distributors, Inc, and eCOST.com, Inc.
are collectively referred to as the Company; Supplies Distributors refers to Supplies
Distributors, Inc. and its subsidiaries; eCOST refers to eCOST.com, Inc.; and PFSweb refers to
PFSweb, Inc. and its subsidiaries excluding Supplies Distributors and eCOST.
PFSweb Overview
PFSweb is an international business process outsourcing provider of end-to-end eCommerce
solutions to major brand name companies seeking to optimize their supply chain and to enhance their
traditional and online business channels and initiatives in the United States, Canada, and Europe.
PFSweb offers such services as professional consulting, technology collaboration, managed web
hosting and internet application development, order management, web-enabled customer contact
centers, customer relationship management, financial services including billing and collection
services and working capital solutions, information management, facilities and operations
management, kitting and assembly services, and international fulfillment and distribution services.
Supplies Distributors Overview
Supplies Distributors, PFSweb and InfoPrint Solutions Company (IPS), a joint venture company
owned by Ricoh and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), have entered into master
distributor agreements under which Supplies Distributors acts as a master distributor of various
products, primarily IPS product.
Supplies Distributors has obtained certain financing (see Notes 3 and 4) that allows it to
fund the working capital requirements for the sale of primarily IPS products. Pursuant to the
transaction management services agreements between PFSweb and Supplies Distributors, PFSweb
provides to Supplies Distributors transaction management and fulfillment services, such as managed
web hosting and maintenance, procurement support, web-enabled customer contact center services,
customer relationship management, financial services including billing and collection services,
information management and international distribution services. Supplies Distributors does not have
its own sales force and relies upon IPSs sales force and product demand generation activities for
its sale of IPS products. Supplies Distributors sells its products in the United States, Canada
and Europe.
All of the agreements between PFSweb and Supplies Distributors were made in the context of a
related party relationship and were negotiated in the overall context of PFSwebs and Supplies
Distributors arrangement with IPS. Although management believes that the terms of these agreements
are generally consistent with fair market values, there can be no assurance that the prices charged
to or by each company under these arrangements are not higher or lower than the prices that may be
charged by, or to, unaffiliated third parties for similar services.
eCOST Overview
eCOST is a multi-category online discount retailer of new, close-out and recertified
brand-name merchandise, selling products primarily to customers in the United States. eCOST offers
products in several primary merchandise categories, including computers, networking, electronics
and entertainment, TVs, monitors and projectors, cameras and camcorders, memory and storage, For
the Home and sports and leisure. eCOST carries products from leading manufacturers such as Sony,
JVC, Canon, Hewlett-Packard, Denon, Cuisinart, Sennheiser, Garmin, Panasonic, Toshiba and Microsoft.
The Companys liquidity has been negatively impacted as a result of the merger with eCOST.
Since the merger, eCOST has experienced a net use of cash primarily due to operating losses. As a
result, the Company has had to support eCOSTs cash needs with the goal of reducing operating
losses. The amount of additional cash needed to support eCOST operations will depend upon working
capital requirements, bank financing availability as well as eCOSTs continued ability to improve
its financial results. Further advances to eCOST may be limited by the Companys current cash and
future cash flow and may be restricted by the Companys credit facility obligations.
55
In the event eCOST is unable to increase its revenue and/or gross profit from its present
levels, it may fail to comply with one or more of the financial covenants required under its
working capital line of credit. In such event, absent a waiver, the working capital lender would
be entitled to accelerate all amounts outstanding thereunder and exercise all other rights and
remedies, including sale of collateral and demand for payment under the Company parent guaranty.
Any acceleration of the repayment of the credit facility would have a material adverse impact on
the Companys financial condition and results of operations and no assurance can be given that the
Company would have the financial ability to repay all of such obligations.
Management currently believes eCOST will meet the Companys expectations related to improved
overall profitability. The Company has reported improvement in eCOSTs financial results beginning
in 2007, excluding the impact of any non-cash impairment charges, and expects continued improvement
as a result of efforts to increase sales, improve product mix and further improve operational
efficiencies, although there can be no assurance that these future improvements will be achieved.
If eCOST does not meet expectations, the Company anticipates that it would be able to terminate or
sublease eCOSTs facilities, liquidate remaining inventory through the eCOST website and reduce
certain personnel related costs as needed so as to minimize any material impact upon the Companys
other segments.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Investment in Affiliates
Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. (PFS), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PFSweb, has made
advances to Supplies Distributors that are evidenced by a Subordinated Demand Note (the
Subordinated Note). Under the terms of certain of the Companys debt facilities, the outstanding
balance of the Subordinated Note cannot be increased to more than $5.5 million or decreased to less
than $4.3 million without prior approval of the Companys lenders (see Notes 3 and 4). As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the outstanding balance of the Subordinated Note was $5.0 million and
$5.5 million, respectively. The Subordinate Note is eliminated in the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
PFS has also made advances to eCOST, which aggregated $10.9 million and $10.6 million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Certain terms of the Companys debt facilities provide
that the total advances to eCOST may not be less than $2.0 million without prior approval of
eCOSTs lender. PFS has received the approval of its lender to advance incremental amounts subject
to certain cash inflows to PFS, as defined, to certain of its subsidiaries and/or affiliates,
including eCOST, if needed. PFSweb has also advanced eCOST $5.0 million and $4.7 million as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make judgments, estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The recognition and allocation of certain revenues
and operating expenses in these consolidated financial statements also require management estimates
and assumptions. The Companys estimates and assumptions are continually evaluated based on
available information and experience. Because the use of estimates is inherent in the financial
reporting process, actual results could differ from estimates.
Revenue and Cost Recognition
Depending on the terms of the customer arrangement, Supplies Distributors recognizes product
revenue and product cost either upon the shipment of product to customers or when the customer
receives the product. Supplies Distributors permits its customers to return product for credit
against other purchases, which include returns for defective products (that Supplies Distributors
then returns to the manufacturer) and incorrect shipments. Supplies
56
Distributors provides a reserve for estimated returns and allowances and offers terms to its customers that it believes are standard for its industry.
Freight costs billed to customers are reflected as components of product revenue. Freight
costs incurred are recorded as a component of cost of goods sold.
Under the master distributor agreements (see Note 6), Supplies Distributors bills IPS for
reimbursements of certain expenses, including: pass through customer marketing programs, including
rebates and coop funds; certain freight costs; direct costs incurred in passing on any price
decreases offered by IPS to Supplies Distributors or its customers to cover price protection and
certain special bids; the cost of products provided to replace defective product returned by
customers; and certain other expenses as defined. Supplies Distributors includes these reimbursable
amounts as they are incurred with a corresponding reduction in either inventory or cost of product
revenue. Supplies Distributors also reflects pass through customer marketing programs as a
reduction of both product revenue and cost of product revenue.
eCOST recognizes product revenue, net of estimated returns, promotional discounts, credit card
fraud and chargebacks, when both title and risk of loss to the products has transferred to the
customer, which eCOST has determined to occur upon receipt of products by the customer. eCOST
generally requires payment by credit card upon placing an order, and to a lesser extent, grants
credit to business customers on normal credit terms. eCOST permits its customers to return
defective product for credit against other purchases.
For product sales shipped directly from eCOSTs vendors to end customers, eCOST records
revenue and related costs at the gross amounts charged to the customer and paid to the vendor based
on an evaluation of certain criteria. eCOSTs evaluation is performed based on a number of factors,
including whether eCOST is the primary obligor in the transaction, has latitude in establishing
prices and selecting suppliers, takes title to the products sold upon shipment, bears credit risk,
and bears inventory risk for returned products that are not successfully returned to third-party
suppliers. eCOST recognizes revenue on extended warranties and other services for which it is not
the primary obligor on a net basis.
The Companys service fee revenue primarily relates to its (1) distribution services, (2)
order management/customer care services and (3) the reimbursement of out-of-pocket and third-party
expenses. The Company typically charges its service fee revenue on a cost-plus basis, a percent of
shipped revenue basis or a per transaction basis, such as a per item basis for fulfillment services
or a per minute basis for web-enabled customer contact center services. Additional fees are billed
for other services.
Distribution services relate primarily to inventory management, product receiving, warehousing
and fulfillment (i.e., picking, packing and shipping) and facilities and operations management.
Service fee revenue for these activities is recognized as earned, which is either (i) on a per
transaction basis or (ii) at the time of product fulfillment, which occurs at the completion of the
distribution services.
Order management/customer care services relate primarily to taking customer orders for the
Companys clients products via various channels such as telephone call-center, electronic or
facsimile. These services also entail addressing customer questions related to orders, as well as
cross-selling/up-selling activities. Service fee revenue for this activity is recognized as the
services are rendered. Fees charged to the client are on a per transaction basis based on either
(i) a pre-determined fee per order or fee per telephone minutes incurred, (ii) a per dedicated
agent fee, or (iii) are included in the product fulfillment service fees that are recognized on
product shipment.
The Companys billings for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, including travel and
certain third-party vendor expenses such as shipping and handling costs and telecommunication
charges are included in pass-through revenue. The related reimbursable costs are reflected as cost
of pass-through revenue.
The Companys cost of service fee revenue, representing the cost to provide the services
described above, is recognized as incurred. Cost of service fee revenue also includes certain costs
associated with technology collaboration and ongoing technology support that include maintenance,
web hosting and other ongoing programming activities. These activities are primarily performed to
support the distribution and order management/customer care services and are recognized as
incurred.
57
The Company recognizes revenue and records trade accounts receivables, pursuant to the methods
described above, when collectability is reasonably assured. Collectability is evaluated in the
aggregate and on an individual customer basis taking into consideration payment due date,
historical payment trends, current financial position, results of independent credit evaluations and payment terms. Related reserves are determined
by either using percentages applied to certain aged receivable categories based on historical
results and are reevaluated and adjusted as additional information is received or a specific
identification method. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts.
The Company primarily performs its services under one to three-year contracts that can
generally be terminated by either party. In conjunction with these long-term contracts, the Company
sometimes receives start-up fees to cover its implementation costs, including certain technology
infrastructure and development costs. The Company defers the fees received, and the related costs,
and amortizes them over the life of the contract. The amortization of deferred revenue is included
as a component of service fee revenue. The amortization of deferred implementation costs is
included as a cost of service fee revenue. To the extent implementation costs for non-technology
infrastructure and development exceed the fees received, the excess costs are expensed as incurred.
The following summarizes the deferred implementation revenues and costs, excluding technology and
development costs that are included in property and equipment (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred implementation revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
3,948 |
|
|
$ |
2,556 |
|
Non-current |
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,628 |
|
|
$ |
3,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred implementation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
1,621 |
|
|
$ |
956 |
|
Non-current |
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,015 |
|
|
$ |
1,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and non-current deferred implementation costs, excluding technology and development
costs, are a component of prepaid expenses and other assets, respectively. Current and non-current
deferred implementation revenues, which may precede the timing of when the related implementation
costs are incurred and thus deferred, are a component of deferred revenue and other liabilities,
respectively.
Concentration of Business and Credit Risk
The Companys service fee revenue is generated under contractual service fee relationships
with multiple client relationships. No clients/customers exceeded 10% of consolidated revenue
during the years 2009 and 2008. A summary of the customer and client concentrations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Product Revenue (as a percentage of
Product Revenue): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer 1 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Fee Revenue (as a percentage of
Service Fee Revenue): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client 1 |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
Client 2 |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
Client 3 |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer/Client 1 |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
Customer/Client 2 |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Client 1 did not renew its contract with PFS effective January 2009, though certain project
work continued to occur through April 2009. PFS currently
operates three distinct geographical contract arrangements with
Client 2, which are aggregated in the service fee revenue percentages reflected
above. During 2010, Client 2 notified PFS that it is not renewing two of its
three contracts with PFS expiring during 2010.
58
PFSweb has provided certain collateralized guarantees of its subsidiaries financings and
credit arrangements. These subsidiaries ability to obtain financing on similar terms would be
significantly impacted without these guarantees.
The Company has multiple arrangements with IBM and IPS and is dependent upon the continuation
of such arrangements. These arrangements, which are critical to the Companys ongoing operations,
include Supplies Distributors master distributor agreements and certain of Supplies Distributors
working capital financing agreements. Substantially all of the Supplies Distributors revenue is generated by
its sale of product purchased from IPS. Supplies Distributors also relies upon IPSs sales force
and product demand generation activities and the discontinuance of such services would have a
material impact upon Supplies Distributors business. In
addition, Supplies Distributors has product sales to IBM and IPS
business units and the Company has an IBM term master lease agreement.
eCOSTs arrangements with its vendors are terminable by either party at will. Loss of any
vendors could have a material adverse effect on eCOSTs financial position, results of operations
and cash flows. Sales of HP and HP-related products represented 44% of eCOSTs net revenues in
2009 (11% of consolidated net revenues) and 43% of eCOSTs net revenues in 2008 (9% of consolidated
net revenues).
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents are defined as short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities,
when acquired, of three months or less.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes the following items (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer remittances |
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
Bond financing (see note 4) |
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted cash |
|
$ |
2,096 |
|
|
$ |
2,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In conjunction with certain of its financing agreements, Supplies Distributors has granted to
its lenders a security interest in certain customer remittances received in specified bank accounts
(see Note 4). At December 31, 2009 and 2008, these bank accounts held $1.2 million and $0.2
million, respectively, which was restricted and can only be used to reduce the outstanding debt.
In conjunction with certain of its financing agreements, eCOST has granted to its lender a
security interest in certain customer remittances received in specified bank accounts (see Note 4).
In both years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 these bank accounts held $0.2 million, which was
restricted and can only be used to reduce the outstanding debt.
Other Receivables
Other receivables include $8.0 million and $9.6 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, primarily for amounts due from IPS and IBM for costs incurred by the Company under
the master distributor agreements (see Note 6). In addition, other receivables included $3.6
million and $3.5 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, applicable to value added
tax receivables.
Inventories
Inventories (all of which are finished goods) are stated at the lower of weighted average cost
or market. The Company establishes inventory reserves based upon estimates of declines in values
due to inventories that are slow moving or obsolete, excess levels of inventory or values assessed
at lower than cost.
Supplies Distributors assumes responsibility for slow-moving inventory under certain master
distributor
59
agreements, subject to certain termination rights, but has the right to return product rendered
obsolete by engineering changes, as defined (see Note 6). In the event PFSweb, Supplies
Distributors and IPS terminate the master distributor agreements, the agreements provide for the
parties to mutually agree on a plan of disposition of Supplies Distributors then existing
inventory.
Supplies Distributors inventories include merchandise in-transit that has not been received
by the Company but that has been shipped and invoiced by Supplies Distributors vendors. The
corresponding payable for inventories in-transit is included in accounts payable in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
eCOST inventories include goods in-transit to customers.
The Company reviews inventory for impairment on a periodic basis, but at a minimum, annually.
Recoverability of the inventory on hand is measured by comparison of the carrying value of the
inventory to the fair value of the inventory. The allowance for slow moving inventory was $2.0
million and $2.1 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Property and Equipment
The components of property and equipment as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Depreciable Life |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
$ |
19,552 |
|
|
$ |
19,126 |
|
|
2-10 years |
Purchased and capitalized software costs |
|
|
19,311 |
|
|
|
17,490 |
|
|
3-5 years |
Computer equipment |
|
|
11,887 |
|
|
|
10,774 |
|
|
3-5 years |
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
7,838 |
|
|
|
7,628 |
|
|
3-5 years |
Other |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,591 |
|
|
|
55,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less-accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(49,277 |
) |
|
|
(43,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
10,314 |
|
|
$ |
12,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company makes judgments and estimates in conjunction with the carrying value of these assets, including
amounts to be capitalized, depreciation and amortization methods and useful lives. Additionally, the Company reviews
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company records
impairment losses in the period in which the Company determines
that the carrying amount is not recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset. This may require the Company to make judgments regarding long-term forecasts of our future
revenues and costs related to the assets subject to review. During 2009 and 2008, no impairment of
property and equipment was identified or recorded.
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Capitalized implementation costs are
depreciated over the respective client contract periods. Leasehold improvements are amortized over
the shorter of the useful life of the related asset or the remaining lease term. Depreciation and
amortization expense related to property and equipment, excluding capital leases, during 2009 and
2008 was $5.0 million and $4.1 million, respectively.
The Companys property held under capital leases amount to approximately $2.1 million and $3.4
million, net of accumulated amortization, of approximately $6.7 million and $8.4 million, at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense related to capital
leases during 2009 and 2008 was $1.7 million in both years.
Intangible Assets
The Company makes judgments and estimates in conjunction with the carrying value of intangible assets,
including amounts to be capitalized, depreciation and amortization methods and useful lives.
Additionally, the Company reviews intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company records
impairment losses in the period in which the Company determines that the carrying amount is not recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of
an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. This may require the Company to
make judgments regarding long-term forecasts of our future revenues and costs related to the assets
subject to review.
In 2008, the Company determined that certain of its identifiable acquired intangible assets
were impaired. The determination was based on the carrying values exceeding the future undiscounted
cash flows and fair value attributable to such intangible assets. As a result, the Company
recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $4.5 million during 2008, which represented the difference
between the estimated fair values of these long-lived assets and their carrying values. Fair
values were determined based upon market conditions, the relief from royalty approach which
utilized cash flow projections, and other factors.
60
There are no residual values for any of the intangible assets subject to amortization acquired
during the eCOST acquisition. The Company is amortizing the intangible assets acquired on a
straight-line basis over their estimated remaining useful lives. Definite lived intangible assets
consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark |
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
Name |
|
|
Relationships |
|
Fair value at acquisition |
|
$ |
4,635 |
|
|
$ |
2,745 |
|
Impairment charge incurred in 2008 |
|
|
(2,756 |
) |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted fair value |
|
$ |
1,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademark |
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Intangibles |
|
|
Total |
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,352 |
) |
|
|
(1,734 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
$ |
961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(1,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value |
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated remaining useful life of the trademark name is four years as of December 31,
2009.
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2009 and $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Subsequent to the 2008 impairment
charge, amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be approximately $0.1 million
annually for each year through the period ending December 31, 2013.
Goodwill
The Company acquired eCOST because of the strategic benefits expected to result from combining
eCOSTs e-commerce platform with PFSwebs advanced technology and operational infrastructure
thereby providing the combined company with the enhanced ability to expand its market share in the
fast growing web commerce market. Such benefits are the primary factors that contributed to a
purchase price that resulted in the recognition of goodwill.
The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired
and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill and is included in the eCOST reportable segment.
Goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes, is not being amortized but is subject to an
impairment test each year, using a fair-value-based approach.
The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test as of December 31. During the
Companys 2008 annual analysis of the carrying value of goodwill, the Company determined the
carrying value of goodwill exceeded its fair value, which resulted in a non-cash write-off of
goodwill of $11.8 million. In 2008, as a result of the decline in stock price, the market
capitalization plus an implied control premium fell significantly below the recorded value of its
consolidated net assets as of the testing date. In performing the goodwill impairment test, the
Company used current market capitalization, control premiums, discounted cash flows and other
factors as the best evidence of fair value. The remaining balance of goodwill related to eCOST,
after this impairment charge, was $3.6 million. No impairment was identified in the 2009 annual
impairment test.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
For the Companys Canadian and European operations, the local currency is the functional
currency. All assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the end of the
period, and income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates for the period.
61
The Company includes currency gains and losses on short-term intercompany advances in the
determination of net income and loss. Currency gains and losses, including transaction gains and
losses and those on short-term intercompany advances, included in net loss were net gains of
approximately $0.1 million for both years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The Company reports
gains and losses on intercompany foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term investment
nature as a separate component of shareholders equity.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Boards, or FASB,
new accounting guidance for the fair value measurement of all non-financial assets and liabilities.
The guidance delayed the effective date for the treatment of certain non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a
recurring basis, at least annually, until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance contained in FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 805, which changed the method of accounting for business combinations. Under
ASC 805, an acquiring entity is required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. ASC 805
requires that transaction costs such as legal, accounting and advisory fees be expensed and
requires a substantial number of new disclosures. This new standard did not have any impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance contained in ASC 810, which establishes
new accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The adoption of the statement did not have any impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the applicable sections of ASC 350-30, which amends
the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. ASC 350-30 applies prospectively to all
intangible assets acquired after January 1, 2009, whether acquired in a business combination or
otherwise. The adoption of the applicable sections of ASC 350-30 will impact the Companys
accounting for new intangible assets acquired in business combinations that occur after January 1,
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB updated, and the Company adopted, the Subsequent Events Topic of the
FASB ASC to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
This topic requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for that date, that is, whether the date represents the date the financial
statements were issued or were available to be issued. This topic was effective in the first
interim period ending after June 15, 2009 and amended on February 24, 2010. The adoption of this
update did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-01, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and
approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of
authoritative nongovernmental US GAAP. The Codification does not change previous US GAAP, but is
intended to simplify user access to all authoritative US GAAP by providing all the authoritative
literature related to a particular topic in one place. All prior accounting standard documents
will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be
considered non-authoritative. ASU 2009-01 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The implementation of this update did not have an impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13,
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force to
amend certain guidance in FASB
62
Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC) 605, Revenue Recognition, 25,
Multiple-Element Arrangements. The amended guidance in ASC 605-25 (1) modifies the separation
criteria by eliminating the criterion that requires objective and reliable evidence of fair value
for the undelivered item(s), and (2) eliminates the use of the residual method of allocation and
instead requires that arrangement consideration be allocated, at the inception of the arrangement,
to all deliverables based on their relative selling price.
The FASB also issued ASU 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements
a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, to amend the scope of arrangements under ASC
985, Software, 605, Revenue Recognition to exclude tangible products containing software
components and non-software components that function together to deliver a products essential
functionality.
The amended guidance in ASC 605-25 and ASC 985-605 is effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15,
2010, with early application and retrospective application permitted. The Company is in the process
of evaluating the impact the amendments to ASC 605-25 and ASC 985-605 will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
Income Taxes
For federal income tax purposes, tax years that remain subject to examination include years
2005 through 2009. However, the utilization of net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards that arose
prior to 2005 remain subject to examination through the years such carryforwards are utilized. For
Europe, tax years that remain subject to examination include years 2006 to 2009. However, the
utilization of NOL carryforwards that arose prior to 2006 remain subject to examination through the
years such carryforwards are utilized. For Canada, tax years that remain subject to examination
include years 2002 to 2009, depending on the subsidiary. For state income tax purposes, the tax
years that remain subject to examination include years 2004 to 2009, depending upon the
jurisdiction in which the Company files tax returns. The Company and its subsidiaries have various
state income tax returns in the process of examination or administrative appeals. The Company does
not expect that these examinations will result in unrecognized tax benefits.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets
to the amount more likely than not to be realized.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to certain tax positions in income tax
expense.
Self Insurance
The Company is self-insured for medical insurance benefits up to certain stop-loss limits.
Such costs are accrued based on known claims and an estimate of incurred, but not reported (IBNR)
claims. IBNR claims are estimated using historical lag information and other data provided by
claims administrators.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of the Companys financial instruments, which include cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt and capital lease obligations,
approximate their fair values based on short terms to maturity or current market prices and
interest rates.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business
enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner
sources. Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and foreign currency translation
adjustments.
63
Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Stock options not included in the
calculation of diluted net loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, were 1.8
million and 1.4 million, respectively, as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Cash Paid For Interest and Taxes During Year
The Company made payments for interest of approximately $1.3 million and $1.7 million and
income taxes of approximately $0.7 million and $1.6 million during the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively (see Notes 3, 4 and 8).
Advertising Costs
Advertising expenses for the Company, which relate to eCOST, including those for catalog,
internet and other methods, were $0.9 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2009 and
2008 and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Reverse Stock Split
On June 2, 2008, the Company effected a 1-for-4.7 reverse split (Reverse Split) of the
Companys common stock. Pursuant to the Reverse Split, the common stock was combined and
reclassified based on a ratio of 4.7 shares of issued and outstanding common stock being combined
and reclassified into one share of common stock. All share and per share amounts for common stock,
warrants and stock options have been restated to reflect the Reverse Split on a retro-active basis.
Reclassifications
Prior year data related to deferred revenue accrued expenses and interest expense, net have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income (loss) or shareholders
equity.
3. Vendor Financing
Outstanding obligations under vendor financing arrangements consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Inventory and working capital financing agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
16,073 |
|
|
$ |
23,885 |
|
Europe |
|
|
15,649 |
|
|
|
16,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
31,722 |
|
|
$ |
40,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory and Working Capital Financing Agreement, United States
Supplies Distributors has a short-term credit facility with IBM Credit LLC to finance its
distribution of IPS products in the United States, providing financing for eligible IPS inventory
and certain receivables up to $30.5 million through its expiration in March 2010. As of December
31, 2009, Supplies Distributors had $4.0 million of available credit under this facility. The
credit facility contains cross default provisions, various restrictions upon the ability of
Supplies Distributors to, among others, merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur indebtedness, make
loans and payments to related parties (including entities directly or indirectly owned by PFSweb,
Inc.), provide guarantees, make investments and loans, pledge assets, make changes to capital stock
ownership structure and pay dividends, as well as financial covenants, such as annualized revenue
to working capital, net profit after tax to revenue, and total liabilities to tangible net worth,
as defined, and are secured by certain of the assets of Supplies Distributors, as well as a
collateralized guaranty of PFSweb. Additionally, PFS is required to maintain a minimum Subordinated
Note receivable balance from Supplies Distributors of $5.0 million and a minimum shareholders
equity of $18.0 million.
64
Borrowings under the credit facility accrue interest, after a defined free financing period,
at prime rate plus 0.5% (3.75% as of both December 31, 2009 and 2008). The facility also includes a
monthly service fee.
On March 25, 2010, Supplies Distributors entered into an amended credit facility with IBM
Credit LLC, which extends the termination date through April 2011, modifies certain financial
covenants and reduces the minimum Subordinated Note balance to $3.5 million. Given the structure
of this facility and as outstanding balances, which represent inventory purchases, are repaid
within twelve months, the Company has classified the outstanding amounts under this facility as
accounts payable in the consolidated balance sheets.
Inventory and Working Capital Financing Agreement, Europe
Supplies Distributors European subsidiaries have a short-term credit facility with IBM
Belgium Financial Services S.A. (IBM Belgium) to finance distribution of IPS products in Europe.
The asset based credit facility with IBM Belgium provides up to 16 million Euros (approximately
$23.0 million at December 31, 2009) in inventory financing and cash advances based on eligible
inventory and accounts receivable through its expiration in March 2010. As of December 31, 2009,
Supplies Distributors European subsidiaries had 4.7 million Euros (approximately $6.8 million at
December 31, 2009) of available credit. The credit facility contains cross default provisions,
various restrictions upon the ability of Supplies Distributors and its European subsidiaries to,
among others, merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur indebtedness, make loans and payments to
related parties (including entities directly or indirectly owned by PFSweb, Inc.), provide
guarantees, make investments and loans, pledge assets, make changes to capital stock ownership
structure and pay dividends, as well as financial covenants, such as annualized revenue to working
capital, net profit after tax to revenue, and total liabilities to tangible net worth, as defined,
and are secured by certain of the assets of Supplies Distributors European subsidiary, as well as
collateralized guaranties of Supplies Distributors and PFSweb. Additionally, PFSweb is required to
maintain a minimum Subordinated Note receivable balance from Supplies Distributors of $5.0 million
and a minimum shareholders equity of $18.0 million. Borrowings under the credit facility accrue
interest at Euribor plus 1.94% for cash advances, and, after a defined free financing period, at
Euribor plus 4.25% for inventory financings. As of December 31, 2009 there were no outstanding
cash advances and the interest rate was 4.7% on the $15.6 million of outstanding inventory
financings. As of December 31, 2008 the interest rate was 4.1%. Supplies Distributors European
subsidiary pays a monthly service fee on the commitment.
On March 25, 2010, Supplies Distributors European subsidiaries entered into an amended credit
facility with IBM Belgium, which extends the termination date through April 2011, modifies certain
financial covenants and reduces the minimum Subordinated Note balance to $3.5 million. Given the
structure of this facility and as outstanding balances, which represent inventory purchase, are
repaid within twelve months, the Company has classified the outstanding amounts under this facility
as accounts payable in the consolidated balance sheets.
4. Debt and Capital Lease Obligations:
Outstanding obligations under debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Loan and security agreements, United States: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplies Distributors |
|
$ |
8,921 |
|
|
$ |
9,649 |
|
PFS |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Credit facility eCOST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factoring agreement, Europe |
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
2,577 |
|
Taxable revenue bonds |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
Master lease agreements |
|
|
3,467 |
|
|
|
4,657 |
|
Other |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
22,527 |
|
|
|
27,202 |
|
Less current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
19,179 |
|
|
|
22,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
3,348 |
|
|
$ |
4,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
Loan and Security Agreement Supplies Distributors
Supplies Distributors has a loan and security agreement with Wachovia Bank, N.A. (Wachovia)
to provide financing for up to $25 million of eligible accounts receivable in the United States and
Canada. As of December 31, 2009, Supplies Distributors had $0.7 million of available credit under
this agreement. The Wachovia facility expires on the earlier of March 2011 or the date on which the
parties to the IPS master distributor agreement (see Note 6) no longer operate under the terms of
such agreement and/or IPS no longer supplies products pursuant to such agreement. Borrowings under
the Wachovia facility accrue interest at prime rate plus 0.25% to 0.75% or Eurodollar rate plus
2.5% to 3.0%, dependent on excess availability, as defined. The interest rate as of December 31,
2009 was 3.75% for $5.9 million of outstanding borrowings and 2.23% for $3.0 million of outstanding
borrowings. As of December 31, 2008, the interest rate was 4.0% for $5.6 million of outstanding
borrowings and 2.5% for $4.0 million of outstanding borrowings. This agreement contains cross
default provisions, various restrictions upon the ability of Supplies Distributors to, among other
things, merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur indebtedness, make loans and payments to related
parties (including entities directly or indirectly owned by PFSweb, Inc.), provide guarantees, make
investments and loans, pledge assets, make changes to capital stock ownership structure and pay
dividends, as well as financial covenants, such as minimum net worth, as defined, and is secured by
all of the assets of Supplies Distributors, as well as a collateralized guaranty of PFSweb.
Additionally, PFSweb is required to maintain a Subordinated Note receivable balance from Supplies
Distributors of no less than $4.3 million and may not maintain restricted cash of more than $5.0
million, and is restricted with regard to transactions with related parties, indebtedness and
changes to capital stock ownership structure. Supplies Distributors has entered into blocked
account agreements with its banks and Wachovia pursuant to which a security interest was granted to
Wachovia for all U.S. and Canadian customer remittances received in specified bank accounts. At
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, these bank accounts held $1.0 million and $0.1 million,
respectively, which was restricted for payment to Wachovia.
Loan and Security Agreement PFSweb
PFS has a Loan and Security Agreement (Comerica Agreement) with Comerica Bank (Comerica).
The Comerica Agreement provides for up to $10.0 million of eligible accounts receivable financing
through March 2010. As of December 31, 2009, PFS had $3.8 million of available credit under this
facility. Borrowings under the Comerica Agreement accrue interest at a defined rate, which will
generally be prime rate plus 2%, with a minimum of 4.5% (5.25% and 4.25% at December, 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively). The Comerica Agreement contains cross default provisions, various
restrictions upon PFS ability to, among other things, merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur
indebtedness, make loans and payments to related parties (including entities directly or indirectly
owned by PFSweb, Inc.), make capital expenditures, make investments and loans, pledge assets, make
changes to capital stock ownership structure, as well as financial covenants of a minimum tangible
net worth of $20 million, as defined, a minimum earnings before interest and taxes, plus
depreciation, amortization and non-cash compensation accruals, if any, as defined, and a minimum
liquidity ratio, as defined. The Comerica Agreement restricts the amount of the subordinated note
receivable from Supplies Distributors to a maximum of $5.5 million. The Comerica Agreement is
secured by all of the assets of PFS, as well as a guarantee of PFSweb, Inc.
On March 25, 2010, PFS entered into an amended agreement with Comerica, which extends the
termination date through March 2011, modifies certain financial covenants and provides the approval
for PFS to advance incremental amounts subject to certain cash inflows to PFS, as defined, to
certain of its subsidiaries and/or affiliates, including eCOST, if needed.
Credit Facility eCOST
eCOST has an asset-based line of credit facility of up to $7.5 million from Wachovia, through
May 2011, which is collateralized by substantially all of eCOSTs assets. Borrowings under the
facility are limited to a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory. Outstanding
borrowings under the facility bear interest at rates ranging from prime rate plus 0.75% to 1.25% or
Eurodollar rate plus 3.0% to 4.0%, depending on eCOSTs financial results. There were no
outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2009 or 2008. As of December 31, 2009, eCOST had $1.0
million of letters of credit outstanding and $1.2 million of available credit under this facility.
In connection with the line of credit, eCOST entered into a cash management arrangement whereby
eCOSTs operating amounts are considered restricted and swept and used to repay outstanding amounts
under the line of credit. As of December 31,
66
2009 and December 31, 2008, the restricted cash amount was $0.2 million in each period. The credit
facility restricts eCOSTs ability to, among other things, merge, consolidate, sell assets, incur
indebtedness, make loans, investments and payments to subsidiaries, affiliates and related parties
(including entities directly or indirectly owned by PFSweb, Inc.), make investments and loans,
pledge assets, make changes to capital stock ownership structure, and requires a minimum tangible
net worth of $0, as defined. PFSweb has guaranteed all current and future obligations of eCOST
under this line of credit.
Factoring Agreement
Supplies Distributors European subsidiary has a factoring agreement with Fortis Commercial
Finance N.V. (Fortis) to provide factoring for up to 7.5 million Euros (approximately $10.8
million at December 31, 2009) of eligible accounts receivables through March 2011. This factoring
agreement is accounted for as a secured borrowing. As of December 31, 2009, Supplies Distributors
European subsidiary had approximately 1.5 million Euros ($2.2 million) of available credit under
this agreement. Borrowings accrue interest at Euribor plus 1.2% (1.6% and 3.5% at December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively). This agreement contains various restrictions upon the ability of Supplies
Distributors European subsidiary to, among other things, merge, consolidate and incur
indebtedness, as well as financial covenants, such as minimum net worth. This agreement is secured
by a guarantee of Supplies Distributors, up to a maximum of 200,000 Euros.
Taxable Revenue Bonds
PFS has a Loan Agreement with the Mississippi Business Finance Corporation (the MBFC) in
connection with the issuance by the MBFC of $5 million MBFC Taxable Variable Rate Demand Limited
Obligation Revenue Bonds, Series 2004 (Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. Project) (the Bonds).
The MBFC loaned the proceeds of the Bonds to PFS for the purpose of financing the acquisition and
installation of equipment, machinery and related assets located in the Companys Southaven,
Mississippi distribution facility. The Bonds bear interest at a variable rate (0.6% as of December
31, 2009), as determined by Comerica Securities, as Remarketing Agent. PFS, at its option, may
convert the Bonds to a fixed rate, to be determined by the Remarketing Agent at the time of
conversion.
The primary source of repayment of the Bonds is a letter of credit (the Letter of Credit)
issued by Comerica pursuant to a Reimbursement Agreement between PFS and Comerica under which PFS
is obligated to pay to Comerica all amounts drawn under the Letter of Credit. The Letter of Credit
has a maturity date of April 2011 at which time, if not renewed or replaced, will result in a draw
on the undrawn face amount thereof. If the Letter of Credit is renewed or replaced, the Bonds
require future principal repayments of $800,000 in January of each year through 2012. PFS
obligations under the Reimbursement Agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of
PFS, including restricted cash of $0.7 million and a Company parent guarantee.
Debt Covenants
To the extent the Company or any of its subsidiaries fail to comply with its covenants
applicable to its debt or vendor financing obligations, including the monthly financial covenant
requirements and required level of shareholders equity or net worth, and one or all of the lenders
accelerate the repayment of the credit facility obligations, the Company would be required to repay
all amounts outstanding thereunder. In particular, in the event eCOST is unable to increase its
revenue and/or gross profit from its present levels, if PFS service fee revenue declines from
expected levels and it is unable to reduce costs to correspond to such reduced revenue levels or if
Supplies Distributors revenue or gross profit declines from expected levels, such events may result
in a breach of one or more of the financial covenants required under its working capital line of
credit. In such event, absent a waiver, the working capital lender would be entitled to accelerate
all amounts outstanding thereunder and exercise all other rights and remedies, including sale of
collateral and demand for payment under the Company parent guaranty. Any acceleration of the
repayment of the credit facilities would have a material adverse impact on the Companys financial
condition and results of operations and no assurance can be given that the Company would have the
financial ability to repay all of such obligations. As of December 31, 2009, the Company was in
compliance with all debt covenants.
67
Master Lease Agreements
The Company has a Term Lease Master Agreement with IBM Credit (Master Lease Agreement) that
provides for leasing or financing transactions of equipment and other assets, which generally have
terms of three years. The amounts outstanding under this Master Lease Agreement were $1.6 million
and $1.7 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which are secured by the related
equipment (see Note 2).
The Company has two other master agreements with financing companies that provide for leasing
or financing transactions of certain equipment. The amounts outstanding under these agreements as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $0.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and are secured by
the related equipment.
The Company has other leasing and financing agreements and will continue to enter into those
arrangements as needed to finance the purchasing or leasing of certain equipment or other assets.
Borrowings under these agreements are generally secured by the related equipment.
Debt and Capital Lease Maturities
The Companys aggregate maturities of debt subsequent to December 31, 2009 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
17,993 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,122 |
|
2012 |
|
|
278 |
|
2013 |
|
|
184 |
|
2014 |
|
|
35 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a schedule of the Companys future minimum lease payments under the capital
leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2009
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
2011 |
|
|
601 |
|
2012 |
|
|
164 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
2,044 |
|
Less amount representing interest at rates ranging from 4.7% to 16.5% |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
|
|
1,915 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(1,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Stock and Stock Options
On June 2, 2008, the Company effected a 1-for-4.7 reverse split (Reverse Split) of the
Companys common stock. Pursuant to the Reverse Split, the common stock was combined and
reclassified based on a ratio of 4.7 shares of issued and outstanding common stock being combined
and reclassified into one share of common stock. No fractional shares were issued in connection
with the Reverse Split. Shareholders who were entitled to fractional shares received cash in lieu
of fractional shares. All share, per share, warrant and option amounts have been restated to
reflect the Reverse Split on a retro-active basis.
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
On June 8, 2000, the Companys Board of Directors declared a dividend distribution of one
preferred stock purchase right (a Right) for each share of the Companys common stock outstanding
on July 6, 2000 and each
68
share of common stock issued thereafter. Each Right entitles the registered shareholders to
purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of preferred stock at an exercise price of
$314.90, subject to adjustment. The Rights are not currently exercisable, but would become
exercisable if certain events occurred relating to a person or group acquiring or attempting to
acquire 20 percent or more of the Companys outstanding shares of common stock. The Rights expire
on July 6, 2010, unless redeemed, exchanged or extended by the Company.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company offers the PFSweb Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Stock Purchase Plan) that is
qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to provide employees of the
Company an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company. The Stock Purchase Plan
permits each U.S. employee who has completed 90 days of service to elect to participate in the
plan. Eligible employees may elect to contribute with after-tax dollars up to a maximum annual
contribution of $25,000. The Stock Purchase Plan provides for acquisition of the Companys common
stock at a 5% discount to the market value on the date of purchase. The Company has reserved 0.9
million shares of its common stock under the Stock Purchase Plan. During the years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008, the Company issued 17,070 and 7,522 shares under the Stock Purchase Plan,
respectively. As of December 31, 2009, there were 433,571 shares available for further issuance
under the Stock Purchase Plan.
Stock Options and Stock Option Plans
The Company recognizes compensation cost for all share-based payments based on the grant date
fair value. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures,
over the requisite service period of each award.
Stock-based compensation charged against income was $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, there was $0.5
million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock options, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.7 years.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had the following share-based compensation plans:
PFSweb Plan Options
The Company has an Employee Stock and Incentive Plan and an Outside Director Stock Option and
Retainer Plan under which an aggregate of 3,117,341 shares of common stock have been authorized for
issuance (the Stock Options Plans) and an outstanding stock option agreement under which 7,446
shares were originally authorized for issuance. The Stock Option Plans provide for the granting of
incentive awards in the form of stock options to directors, executive management, key employees,
and outside consultants of the Company. The rights to purchase shares under the employee stock
option agreements typically vest over a three-year period, one-twelfth each quarter. Stock options
must be exercised within 10 years from the date of grant. Stock options are generally issued such
that the exercise price is equal to the market value of the Companys common stock at the date of
grant.
As of December 31, 2009, there were 1,297,965 shares available for future grants under the
Stock Option Plans.
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Stock Option Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price Per Share |
|
Price |
|
Life |
|
Value |
Outstanding, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,352,407 |
|
|
$ |
1.83$75.20 |
|
|
$ |
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
352,992 |
|
|
$ |
1.01$1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
(39,141 |
) |
|
$ |
1.83$75.20 |
|
|
$ |
7.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,666,258 |
|
|
$ |
1.01$13.91 |
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,287,151 |
|
|
$ |
1.01$13.91 |
|
|
$ |
5.55 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable and expected to vest, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,603,881 |
|
|
$ |
1.01$13.91 |
|
|
$ |
4.88 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
The weighted average fair value per share of options granted during the years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008 was $1.04 and $3.14, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised under the Stock Option Plans was $0.04 million during the year ended December 31, 2008.
PFSweb Non-plan Options
Prior to the Companys initial public offering, certain of the Companys employees were
holders of stock options of the Companys former parent company, Daisytek International Corporation
(Daisytek), issued under Daisyteks stock option plans.
In connection with the completion of the Companys spin-off from Daisytek on July 6, 2000 (the
Spin-off), all outstanding Daisytek stock options were replaced with substitute stock options.
Daisytek options held by PFSweb employees were replaced (at the option holders election made prior
to the Spin-off) with either options to acquire shares of PFSweb common stock or options to acquire
shares of both Daisytek common stock and PFSweb common stock (which may be exercised separately)
(the Unstapled Options). Options held by Daisytek employees were replaced (at the option holders
election made prior to the Spin-off) with either options to acquire shares of Daisytek common stock
or Unstapled Options.
As a result of the stock option replacement process described above, in conjunction with the
Spin-off, PFSweb stock options (the Non-plan Options) were issued to PFSweb and Daisytek
officers, directors and employees. These options were issued as one-time grants and were not issued
under the Stock Option Plans. The terms and provisions of the Non-plan Options are substantially
the same as options issued under the Stock Option Plans.
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Non-plan Options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price Per Share |
|
Price |
|
Life |
|
Value |
Outstanding, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
91,022 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
91,022 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
91,022 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants of options under the Stock
Option Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
77% - 82 |
% |
|
|
81% - 85 |
% |
Weighted average stock price volatility |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.0% - 3.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1% - 3.8 |
% |
Expected life of options (years) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions,
including the expected life of the stock-based award and stock-price volatility. The assumptions
listed above represent managements best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent
uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had
been used, the Companys recorded and pro forma stock-based compensation expense could have been
different. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only
recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If the Companys actual forfeiture rate
70
is materially different from its estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be
materially different. The expected life of options has been computed using the simplified method.
6. Master Distributor Agreements
Supplies Distributors, PFSweb and IPS have entered into master distributor agreements under
which Supplies Distributors acts as a master distributor of various products, primarily IPS
product, and PFSweb provides transaction management and fulfillment services to Supplies
Distributors. The master distributor agreements are subject to periodic renewals, the next of which
is in December 2010. Under the master distributor agreements, IPS sells product to Supplies
Distributors and reimburses Supplies Distributors for certain freight costs, direct costs incurred
in passing on any price decreases offered by IPS to Supplies Distributors or its customers to cover
price protection and certain special bids, the cost of products provided to replace defective
product returned by customers and other certain expenses as defined. Supplies Distributors can
return to IPS product rendered obsolete by IPS engineering changes after customer demand ends. IPS
determines when a product is obsolete. IPS and Supplies Distributors also have agreements under
which IPS reimburses or collects from Supplies Distributors amounts calculated in certain inventory
cost adjustments.
Supplies Distributors passes through to customers marketing programs specified by IPS and
administers, along with a party performing product demand generation for the IPS products, such
programs according to IPS guidelines.
7. Supplies Distributors
Pursuant to a credit agreement, Supplies Distributors is restricted from making any
distributions to PFSweb if, after giving affect thereto, Supplies Distributors would be in
noncompliance with its financial covenants. Under the terms of its amended credit agreements, Supplies Distributors is
restricted from paying annual cash dividends without the prior approval of its lenders (see Notes 3
and 4). Supplies Distributors has received lender approval to pay approximately $3.0 million of
dividends in 2010. Supplies Distributors paid dividends to PFSweb of $2.1 million and $3.0 million
in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
8. Income Taxes
A reconciliation of the difference between the expected income tax expense at the U.S. federal
statutory corporate tax rate of 34%, and the Companys effective tax rate is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Income tax benefit computed at statutory rate |
|
$ |
(1,442 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,049 |
) |
Impact of foreign taxation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Foreign dividends received |
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
Items not deductible for tax purposes |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
4,382 |
|
Change in valuation reserve |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
(807 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated income (loss) before income taxes, by domestic and foreign entities, is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
(6,723 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,178 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(4,241 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
Current and deferred income tax expense (benefit) is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
State |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the deferred tax asset (liability) are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
Inventory reserve |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
|
20,066 |
|
|
|
19,034 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,973 |
|
|
|
22,711 |
|
Less Valuation allowance |
|
|
23,326 |
|
|
|
22,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management believes that PFSweb has not established a sufficient history of earnings, on a
stand-alone basis, to support the more likely than not realization of certain deferred tax assets
in excess of existing taxable temporary differences. A valuation allowance has been provided for
the majority of these net deferred income tax assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. At December
31, 2009, net operating loss carryforwards relate to taxable losses of PFSwebs European subsidiary
totaling approximately $7.2 million, PFSwebs Canadian subsidiary totaling approximately $5.6
million and PFSwebs U.S. subsidiaries totaling approximately $46.4 million that expire at various
dates from 2010 through 2029. The U.S. NOL carryforward includes $4.6 million relating to tax
benefits of stock option exercises and, if utilized, will be recorded against additional
paid-in-capital upon utilization rather than as an adjustment to income tax expense from continuing
operations. The U.S. NOL also includes approximately $21.0 million of NOL acquired through the
acquisition of eCOST in 2006, which is subject to annual limits of $1.2 million under IRS Section
382.
The Company evaluates its tax positions for potential liabilities associated with unrecognized
tax benefits. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, no unrecognized tax benefits, penalties or
interest were identified or recorded. The Company does not expect to record unrecognized tax
benefits in the next twelve months.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases facilities, warehouse, office, transportation and other equipment under
operating leases expiring in various years through December 31, 2014. In most cases, management
expects that, in the normal course of business, leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases.
The Companys facility leases generally contain one or more renewal options.
72
Minimum future annual rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases having original
terms in excess of one year are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
|
|
Payments |
|
Fiscal year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
7,225 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,631 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,752 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,071 |
|
2014 |
|
|
180 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum rental payments under operating leases are recognized on a straight-line basis over
the term of the lease including any periods of free rent. Total rental expense under operating
leases approximated $10.2 million and $10.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Certain landlord required deposits are secured by letters of credit.
The Company receives municipal tax abatements in certain locations. During 2004 the Company
received notice from a municipality that it did not satisfy certain criteria necessary to maintain
the abatements. In December 2006 the Company received notice that the municipal authority planned
to make an adjustment to the Companys tax abatement. The
Company has disputed the adjustment as of December 31, 2009, but
if the dispute is not resolved favorably, additional property taxes of approximately $1.7 million
could be assessed against the Company.
The Company is subject to claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims of
alleged infringement by the Company or its subsidiaries of the patents, trademarks and other
intellectual property rights of third parties. The Company does not believe any of such claims will
materially adversely affect its financial condition or results of operations.
10. Segment and Geographic Information
The Company is organized into three operating segments: PFSweb is an international provider of
integrated eCommerce and business process outsourcing solutions and operates as a service fee
business; Supplies Distributors is a master distributor of primarily IPS products; and eCOST is a
multi-category online discount retailer of new, close-out and recertified brand-name merchandise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFSweb |
|
$ |
92,047 |
|
|
$ |
129,910 |
|
Supplies Distributors |
|
|
183,008 |
|
|
|
230,710 |
|
eCOST |
|
|
84,607 |
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(7,163 |
) |
|
|
(8,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
352,499 |
|
|
$ |
451,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFSweb |
|
$ |
(7,276 |
) |
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
Supplies Distributors |
|
|
5,365 |
|
|
|
5,866 |
|
eCOST |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
(19,087 |
) |
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,036 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFSweb |
|
$ |
6,473 |
|
|
$ |
5,607 |
|
Supplies Distributors |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
eCOST |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,852 |
|
|
$ |
6,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFSweb |
|
$ |
4,321 |
|
|
$ |
5,367 |
|
Supplies Distributors |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
eCOST |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,440 |
|
|
$ |
5,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFSweb |
|
$ |
65,716 |
|
|
$ |
108,436 |
|
Supplies Distributors |
|
|
69,291 |
|
|
|
82,280 |
|
eCOST |
|
|
13,579 |
|
|
|
13,489 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(20,817 |
) |
|
|
(59,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
127,769 |
|
|
$ |
144,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic areas in which the Company operates include the United States, Europe (primarily
Belgium), and Canada. The following is geographic information by area. Revenues are attributed
based on the Companys domicile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
268,544 |
|
|
$ |
351,890 |
|
Europe |
|
|
81,460 |
|
|
|
97,739 |
|
Canada |
|
|
5,389 |
|
|
|
5,829 |
|
Inter-segment eliminations |
|
|
(2,894 |
) |
|
|
(3,615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
352,499 |
|
|
$ |
451,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Intangible assets (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
$ |
961 |
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
$ |
961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
$ |
3,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-lived assets (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
11,774 |
|
|
$ |
12,242 |
|
Europe |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
Canada |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,869 |
|
|
$ |
13,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
11. Employee Savings Plan
The Company has a defined contribution employee savings plan under Section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Substantially all full-time and part-time U.S. employees are eligible to
participate in the plan. The Company, at its discretion, may match employee contributions to the
plan and also make an additional matching contribution in the form of profit sharing in recognition
of the Companys performance. The Company contributed approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million
during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, to match an approved percentage of
employee contributions.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9a. (T) CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by
this report (the Evaluation Date), have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective, at a reasonable assurance level, to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the reports that we file and submit under the Exchange Act (i) is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and (ii) is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over
financial reporting is designed, under the supervision of our principle executive and principle
financial officers, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Our internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and Board of Directors; and (iii)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009. This evaluation was based on the framework in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Also, projections of any evaluation
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to
the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
75
Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only managements report
in this annual report.
Item 9b. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Reference is made to the information to be set forth in the section entitled Board of
Directors and Committees of the Board in the definitive proxy statement in connection with our
Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Proxy Statement), which section is incorporated herein by
reference. Our Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later
than 120 days after the last day of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by Part III, Item 11, will be included in the section entitled Executive
Compensation of our Proxy Statement relating to our annual meeting of shareholders and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder
Matters
Information required by Part III, Item 12, will be included in the Sections entitled Election
of Directors and Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management of our Proxy
Statement relating to our annual meeting of shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
The following table summarizes information with respect to equity compensation plans under
which equity securities of the registrant are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
to be issued upon |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
securities |
|
|
|
exercise of |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
outstanding options |
|
|
options and |
|
|
available for |
|
Plan category (1) |
|
and warrants |
|
|
warrants |
|
|
future issuance |
|
Equity
compensation plans
approved by security
holders |
|
|
1,666,258 |
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
|
|
1,297,965 |
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
|
|
91,022 |
|
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,757,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,297,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information
regarding the registrants equity compensation plans. |
Item 13. Certain Relationship and Related Transactions
Information regarding certain of our relationships and related transactions will be included
in the section entitled Certain Relationship and Related Transactions of our Proxy Statement
relating to our annual meeting of shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
76
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information required by Part III, Item 14, will be included in the section entitled
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors of our Proxy Statement relating to our annual
meeting of shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements
All other schedules are omitted because the required information is not present in
amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required
is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
2. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
3.1 (1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PFSweb, Inc. |
3.1.1 (20)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of PFSweb, Inc. |
3.1.2 (32)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of
PFSweb, Inc. |
3.1.3 (36)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of PFSweb, Inc. |
3.2 (1)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws |
3.2.1 (26)
|
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated By-Laws of PFSweb, Inc. |
4.1 (30)
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2000, between the Company
and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, LLC |
4.1 (31)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2008
between the Company and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as
successor to ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., as rights
agent. |
10.1 (17)
|
|
PFSweb, Inc. 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
10.2 (18)
|
|
Amendment 3 to Loan and Security Agreement. |
10.3 (18)
|
|
Amendment 6 to Agreement for Inventory Financing. |
10.4 (18)
|
|
Amendment 1 to First Amended and Restated Loan and Security
Agreement. |
10.5 (16)
|
|
Amendment 5 to Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement. |
10.6 (16)
|
|
Agreement for IBM Global Financing Platinum Plan Invoice
Discounting Schedule. |
10.7 (16)
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Agreement for Inventory Financing. |
10.8 (1)
|
|
Industrial Lease Agreement between Shelby Drive Corporation and
Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
77
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
10.9 (1)
|
|
Lease Contract between Transports Weerts and Priority
Fulfillment Services Europe B.V. |
10.10 (2)
|
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement between the Company and each
of its executive officers |
10.11 (4)
|
|
Ninth Amendment to Lease Agreement by and between AGBRI ATRIUM.
L.P., and Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
10.12 (5)
|
|
Agreement for Inventory Financing by and among Business Supplies
Distributors Holdings, LLC, Supplies Distributors, Inc.,
Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., PFSweb, Inc., Inventory
Financing Partners, LLC and IBM Credit Corporation |
10.13 (5)
|
|
Amended and Restated Collateralized Guaranty by and between
Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. and IBM Credit Corporation |
10.14 (5)
|
|
Amended and Restated Guaranty to IBM Credit Corporation by
PFSweb, Inc. |
10.15 (5)
|
|
Amended and Restated Notes Payable Subordination Agreement by
and between Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., Supplies
Distributors, Inc. and IBM Credit Corporation |
10.16 (5)
|
|
Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement (with Invoice
Discounting) by and among Supplies Distributors, S.A., Business
Supplies Distributors Europe B.V., PFSweb B.V., and IBM Belgium
Financial Services S.A. |
10.17 (5)
|
|
Amended and Restated Collateralized Guaranty between Priority
Fulfillment Services, Inc. and IBM Belgium Financial Services
S.A. |
10.18 (5)
|
|
Amended and Restated Guaranty to IBM Belgium Financial Services
S.A. by PFSweb, Inc. |
10.19 (5)
|
|
Subordinated Demand Note by and between Supplies Distributors,
Inc. and Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
10.20 (5)
|
|
Notes Payable Subordination Agreement between Congress Financial
Corporation (Southwest) and Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
10.21 (5)
|
|
Guarantee in favor of Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest)
by Business Supplies Distributors Holdings, LLC, Priority
Fulfillment Services, Inc. and PFSweb, Inc. |
10.22 (5)
|
|
General Security Agreement by Priority Fulfillment Services,
Inc. in favor of Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest). |
10.23 (5)
|
|
Inducement Letter by Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. and
PFSweb, Inc. in favor of Congress Financial Corporation
(Southwest). |
10.24 (6)
|
|
Form of Executive Severance Agreement between the Company and
each of its executive officers. |
10.24.1 (33)
|
|
Form of Amendment to Executive Severance Agreement. |
10.24.2 (33)
|
|
Form of Amendment to Change in Control Severance Agreement. |
10.25 (7)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement for Inventory Financing by and among
Business Supplies Distributors Holdings, LLC, Supplies
Distributors, Inc., Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., PFSweb,
Inc., Inventory Financing Partners, LLC and IBM Credit
Corporation |
10.26 (7)
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement (with
Invoice Discounting) by and among Supplies Distributors, S.A.,
Business Supplies Distributors Europe B.V., PFSweb B.V., and IBM
Belgium Financial Services S.A. |
10.27 (7)
|
|
Amended and Restated Notes Payable Subordination Agreement by
and between Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., Supplies
Distributors, Inc. and IBM Credit Corporation |
10.28 (7)
|
|
Amendment to Factoring agreement dated March 29, 2002 between
Supplies Distributors S.A. and Fortis Commercial Finance N.V. |
10.29 (8)
|
|
Unconditional Guaranty of PFSweb, Inc. to Comerica Bank
California |
10.30 (8)
|
|
Security Agreement of PFSweb, Inc. to Comerica Bank California |
10.31 (8)
|
|
Intellectual Property Security Agreement between Priority
Fulfillment Services, Inc. and Comerica Bank California |
78
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
10.32 (8)
|
|
Amendment 2 to Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement
(with Invoice Discounting) by and among Supplies Distributors,
S.A., Business Supplies Distributors B.V., PFSweb B.V., and IBM
Belgium Financial Services S.A. |
10.33 (8)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement for Inventory Financing by and among
Business Supplies Distributors Holdings, LLC, Supplies
Distributors, Inc., Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., PFSweb,
Inc., and IBM Credit LLC |
10.34 (9)
|
|
Amendment to factoring agreement dated April 30, 2003 between
Supplies Distributors S.A. and Fortis Commercial Finance N.V. |
10.35 (9)
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement by and between Congress Financial
Corporation (Southwest), as Lender and Supplies Distributors,
Inc., as Borrower dated March 29, 2002. |
10.36 (9)
|
|
General Security Agreement Business Supplies Distributors
Holdings, LLC in favor of Congress Financial Corporation
(Southwest) |
10.37 (9)
|
|
Stock Pledge Agreement between Supplies Distributors, Inc. and
Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest) |
10.38 (9)
|
|
First Amendment to General Security Agreement by Priority
Fulfillment Services, Inc. in favor of Congress Financial
Corporation (Southwest) |
10.39 (12)
|
|
Industrial Lease Agreement between New York Life Insurance
Company and Daisytek, Inc. |
10.40 (12)
|
|
First Amendment to Industrial Lease Agreement between New York
Life Insurance Company, Daisytek, Inc. and Priority Fulfillment
Services, Inc. |
10.41 (12)
|
|
Second Amendment to Industrial Lease Agreement between ProLogis
North Carolina Limited Partnership and Priority Fulfillment
Services, Inc. |
10.42 (12)
|
|
Modification, Ratification and Extension of Lease between Shelby
Drive Corporation and Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
10.43 (13)
|
|
Amendment to Agreement for Inventory Financing by and among
Business Supplies Distributors Holdings, LLC, Supplies
Distributors, Inc., Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., PFSweb,
Inc., and IBM Credit LLC |
10.44 (13)
|
|
Amendment 4 to Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement
(with Invoice Discounting) by and among Supplies Distributors,
S.A., Business Supplies Distributors B.V., PFSweb B.V., and IBM
Belgium Financial Services S.A. |
10.45 (13)
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Notes Payable Subordination Agreement
by and between Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., Supplies
Distributors, Inc. and IBM Credit Corporation. |
10.46 (13)
|
|
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement by and between
Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest), as Lender and
Supplies Distributors, Inc., as Borrower. |
10.47 (13)
|
|
Form of Modification to Executive Severance Agreement. |
10.48 (14)
|
|
Industrial Lease Agreement by and between Industrial
Developments International, Inc. and Priority Fulfillment
Services, Inc. |
10.49 (14)
|
|
Guaranty by PFSweb, Inc. in favor of Industrial Developments
International, Inc. |
10.50 (14)
|
|
Lease between Fleet National Bank and Priority Fulfillment
Services, Inc. |
10.51 (14)
|
|
Guaranty by PFSweb, Inc. in favor of Fleet National Bank |
10.52 (14)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Lease dated as of March 3, 1999 between Fleet
National Bank and Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
10.53 (15)
|
|
Loan Agreement between Mississippi Business Finance Corporation
and Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. dated as of November 1,
2004 |
10.54 (15)
|
|
Reimbursement Agreement between Priority Fulfillment Services,
Inc. and Comerica Bank |
10.55 (15)
|
|
First Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement by and
between Comerica Bank and Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
10.56 (15)
|
|
Remarketing Agreement between Priority Fulfillment Services,
Inc. and Comerica Securities |
79
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
10.57 (20)
|
|
Amendment to factoring agreement dated December 12, 2005 between
Supplies Distributors S.A. and Fortis Commercial Finance N.V. |
10.58 (21)
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Notes Payable Subordination
Agreement by and between Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc.,
Supplies Distributors, Inc. and IBM Credit Corporation. |
10.59 (21)
|
|
Amendment 7 to Agreement for Inventory Financing. |
10.60 (21)
|
|
Amendment 6 to Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement. |
10.61 (21)
|
|
Agreement for IBM Global Financing Platinum Plan Invoice
Discounting Schedule. |
10.62 (21)
|
|
Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement by and between
eCOST.com, Inc. and Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation
(Western). |
10.63 (21)
|
|
Amendment 4 to Loan and Security Agreement. |
10.64 (21)
|
|
Guaranty by PFSweb, Inc., in favor of Wachovia Capital Finance
Corporation (Western). |
10.65 (21)
|
|
Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated Loan and Security
Agreement by and between Comerica Bank and Priority Fulfillment
Services, Inc. |
10.66 (23)
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Lease Agreement by and between Plano Atrium,
LLC and Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
10.67 (24)
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Notes Payable Subordination Agreement
by and between Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., Supplies
Distributors, Inc. and IBM Credit Corporation. |
10.68 (24)
|
|
Amendment 8 to Agreement for Inventory Financing. |
10.69 (24)
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement by and
between eCOST.com, Inc. and Wachovia Capital Finance Corporation
(Western). |
10.70 (24)
|
|
Amendment 5 to Loan and Security Agreement. |
10.71 (24)
|
|
Amendment 7 to Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement. |
10.72 (24)
|
|
Agreement for IBM Global Financing Platinum Plan Invoice
Discounting Schedule. |
10.73 (25)
|
|
Fifth Amendment to First Amended and Restated Loan and Security
Agreement by and between Comerica Bank and Priority Fulfillment
Services, Inc. |
10.74 (27)
|
|
Second Amendment to Industrial Lease Agreement by and between
Industrial Property Fund VI, LLC and Priority Fulfillment
Services, Inc. |
10.75 (29)
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Notes Payable Subordination Agreement
by and between Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc., Supplies
Distributors, Inc. and IBM Credit Corporation. |
10.76 (29)
|
|
Amendment 9 to Agreement for Inventory Financing. |
10.77 (29)
|
|
Amendment 8 to Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement. |
10.78 (29)
|
|
Agreement for IBM Global Financing Platinum Plan Invoice
Discounting Schedule. |
10.79 (29)
|
|
Sixth Amendment to First Amended and Restated Loan and Security
Agreement by and between Comerica Bank and Priority Fulfillment
Services, Inc. |
10.80 (34)
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated January 6,
2009 between Wachovia Bank and Supplies Distributors, Inc. |
10.81 (34)
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated January 6,
2009 between Wachovia Bank and eCOST.com Inc. |
10.82 (35)
|
|
Seventh Amended and Restated Notes Payable Subordination
Agreement by and between Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc.,
Supplies Distributors, Inc. and IBM Credit Corporation. |
10.83 (35)
|
|
Amendment 10 to Agreement for Inventory Financing. |
10.84 (35)
|
|
Amendment 9 to Amended and Restated Platinum Plan Agreement. |
10.85 (35)
|
|
Agreement for IBM Global Financing Platinum Plan Invoice
Discounting Schedule. |
10.86 (35)
|
|
Seventh Amendment to First Amended and Restated Loan and
Security |
80
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
|
Agreement by and between Comerica Bank and Priority
Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
10.87 (35)
|
|
2009 Management Bonus Plan |
10.88 (36)
|
|
Amended and Restated 2005 Employee Stock and Incentive Plan of
PFSweb, Inc. |
10.89 (36)
|
|
Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option and
Retainer Plan of PFSweb, Inc. |
21 (37)
|
|
Subsidiary Listing |
23.1 (37)
|
|
Consent of GRANT THORNTON, LLP, Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm |
31.1 (37)
|
|
Certifications of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 |
31.2 (37)
|
|
Certifications of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 |
32.1 (37)
|
|
Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Commission File No. 333-87657). |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2001 |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2001 |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-K for the transition period
ended December 31, 2001 |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2002 |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2002 |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002 |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2003 |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2003 |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003 |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on November 10,
2003 |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2004 |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2004 |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2005. |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14,
2005. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2005. |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
November 30, 2005. |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005. |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006. |
|
(22) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June
2, 2006. |
|
(23) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2006. |
|
(24) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006. |
|
(25) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2007. |
|
(26) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on November 13,
2007. |
|
(27) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007. |
|
(28) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2008. |
|
(29) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2008. |
|
(30) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed
on June 14, 2000. |
|
(31) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Report on Form 8K filed on May 30, 2008. |
|
(32) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2008. |
|
(33) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6,
2009. |
81
|
|
|
(34) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on January 9,
2009. |
|
(35) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2009. |
|
(36) |
|
Incorporated by reference from PFSweb, Inc. Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2009. |
|
(37) |
|
Filed herewith. |
82
SCHEDULE I
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
BALANCE SHEETS PARENT COMPANY ONLY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
926 |
|
Receivable from Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc. |
|
|
5,390 |
|
|
|
5,624 |
|
Receivable from eCOST.com, Inc. |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
18,831 |
|
|
|
22,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
29,353 |
|
|
$ |
33,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to PFSweb BV SPRL |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
93,152 |
|
|
|
92,728 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(65,963 |
) |
|
|
(61,393 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
29,353 |
|
|
|
33,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
|
$ |
29,353 |
|
|
$ |
33,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes.
83
SCHEDULE I
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS PARENT COMPANY ONLY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY IN NET LOSS OF CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES |
|
$ |
(4,570 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
$ |
(4,570 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes.
84
SCHEDULE I
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS PARENT COMPANY ONLY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,570 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,655 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net loss of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
15,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Increase in receivable from eCOST.com, Inc. |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in payable due to PFSweb BV SPRL |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
714 |
|
Increase (decrease) in receivable from Priority
Fulfillment Services, Inc., net |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH |
|
|
(744 |
) |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes.
85
SCHEDULE II
PFSWEB, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charges to Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
and |
|
Charges to Other |
|
Balance Acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of |
|
|
of Period |
|
Expenses |
|
Accounts |
|
via Acquisition |
|
Deductions |
|
Period |
Year Ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
1,483 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(677 |
) |
|
$ |
980 |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
$ |
973 |
|
86
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ THOMAS J. MADDEN
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Madden, |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
Mark C. Layton
|
|
Chief Executive Officer (Principal |
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
Thomas J. Madden
|
|
Financial and Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting |
|
|
|
|
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
Dr. Neil Jacobs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
Timothy M. Murray |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
James F. Reilly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
David I. Beatson |
|
|
|
|
87
exv21
Exhibit 21
|
|
|
Name |
|
Jurisdiction |
Priority Fulfillment Services, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Priority Fulfillment Services of Canada, Inc.
|
|
Ontario |
PFSweb BV SPRL (f/k/a Priority Fulfillment Services Europe, B.V.)
|
|
Belgium |
Business Supplies Distributors Holdings, LLC
|
|
Delaware |
Supplies Distributors, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
Supplies Distributors of Canada, Inc.
|
|
Ontario |
Supplies Distributors S.A.
|
|
Belgium |
eCOST.com, Inc.
|
|
Delaware |
eCOST Philippines Services, LLC
|
|
Philippines |
exv23w1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We have issued our report dated March 31, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules in the Annual Report of PFSweb, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of PFSweb, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-164973, effective February 18,
2010, 333-128486, effective September 21, 2005, 333-75764, effective December 21, 2001, 333-75772,
effective December 21, 2001; 333-46096, effective September 19, 2000; 333-42186, effective July 25,
2000 and 333-40020, effective June 23, 2000) and on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-164971, effective
March 17, 2010, 333-135794, effective July 17, 2006 and 333-110853, effective December 1, 2003).
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 31, 2010
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
I, Mark Layton, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of PFSweb, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Mark C. Layton |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
I, Thomas Madden, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of PFSweb, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and |
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Thomas J. Madden |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of PFSweb, Inc.
(the Company), does hereby certify that:
The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and
for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
/s/
Mark C. Layton |
|
|
|
Mark C. Layton |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
/s/
Thomas J. Madden |
|
|
|
Thomas J. Madden |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item
601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
in such filing.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PFSweb,
Inc. and will be retained by PFSweb, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.